Oh Bernice, Lee Shawn, Ke Yuhe, Kimpo Miriam, Yeoh Allen, Quah Thuan Chong
Viva-University Children's Cancer Centre, Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Front Pediatr. 2020 Aug 12;8:466. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00466. eCollection 2020.
Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) is a childhood disorder of histiocytes that is generally treated with systemic chemotherapy. Spontaneous resolution has been previously reported in Single System LCH (SS-LCH), which is less aggressive than multisystem disease. However, there are no clear guidelines on which patients can be safely spared from systemic chemotherapy. Here, we propose a risk stratification framework based on disease quiescence as determined by clinical and biochemical features of inflammation, to identify low risk patients who may be potentially spared from chemotherapy through a conservative "wait-and-see" approach. Retrospective analysis in a single institution was conducted in children with SS-LCH, comparing features of inflammation and outcomes of those who received chemotherapy vs. those with quiescent disease, who were managed conservatively. Of 44 children with SS-LCH, only patients without risk-organ involvement were considered for conservative management. A "wait-and-see" approach was adopted for patients with quiescent disease as defined by clinical and biochemical evidence of disease activity. Following 2 weeks of watchful observation, decisions were made to either start treatment or continue conservative management. Based on data collected at diagnosis, patients with quiescent disease had a lower mean platelet count 339 × 10/L (95%C.I: 285-393) vs. 482 × 10/L (95% C.I: 420-544) < 0.01, a lower mean white cell count 9.3 × 10/L (95%C.I: 7.5-11.1) vs. 13.1 × 10/L (95%C.I: 11-15.2) < 0.01 and lower Erythrocyte-Sedimentation-Rate (ESR) 8.2 mm/h (95%C.I: 5.4-11) vs. 53.7 mm/h (95%C.I: 11-96.3) = 0.04, suggesting that these are potential biochemical markers of disease activity. Other features of disease quiescence noted were rapid progression, functional disability, presence of a skull depression rather a lump and the lack of fever. Further studies are required to validate our proposed framework to determine disease activity in SS-LCH. Within the limits of this current analysis, it appears that low-risk patients with clinically and biochemically quiescent SS-LCH, may potentially be spared from chemotherapy with good long-term outcomes.
朗格汉斯细胞组织细胞增多症(LCH)是一种儿童期组织细胞疾病,通常采用全身化疗进行治疗。此前已有单系统LCH(SS-LCH)自发缓解的报道,单系统LCH的侵袭性低于多系统疾病。然而,对于哪些患者可以安全地不进行全身化疗,目前尚无明确的指导方针。在此,我们基于炎症的临床和生化特征所确定的疾病静止状态,提出了一种风险分层框架,以识别可能通过保守的“观察等待”方法避免化疗的低风险患者。我们对一家机构中患有SS-LCH的儿童进行了回顾性分析,比较了接受化疗的患者与病情静止、采用保守治疗的患者的炎症特征和治疗结果。在44例患有SS-LCH的儿童中,只有无风险器官受累的患者才考虑进行保守治疗。对于根据疾病活动的临床和生化证据定义为病情静止的患者,采用“观察等待”方法。经过2周的密切观察后,决定开始治疗或继续保守治疗。根据诊断时收集的数据,病情静止的患者平均血小板计数较低,为339×10⁹/L(95%置信区间:285 - 393),而接受化疗的患者为482×10⁹/L(95%置信区间:420 - 544),P<0.01;平均白细胞计数较低,为9.3×10⁹/L(95%置信区间:7.5 - 11.1),而接受化疗的患者为13.1×10⁹/L(95%置信区间:11 - 15.2),P<0.01;红细胞沉降率(ESR)较低,为8.2mm/h(95%置信区间:5.4 - 11),而接受化疗的患者为53.7mm/h(95%置信区间:11 - 96.3),P = 0.04,这表明这些可能是疾病活动的潜在生化标志物。观察到的疾病静止的其他特征包括快速进展、功能障碍、存在颅骨凹陷而非肿块以及无发热。需要进一步的研究来验证我们提出的用于确定SS-LCH疾病活动的框架。在当前分析的范围内,似乎临床和生化上病情静止的低风险SS-LCH患者可能有机会避免化疗,并获得良好的长期预后。