Cross Francis Dionne Indera, Hong Ji, Liu Jinqing, Eker Ayfer, Lloyd Kemol, Bharaj Pavneet Kaur, Jeon MiHyun
Culture, Curriculum and Teacher Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Department of Educational Psychology, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 6;11:1865. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01865. eCollection 2020.
Examining the nature of teachers' emotions and how they are managed and regulated in the act of teaching is crucial to assess the quality of teachers' instruction. Despite the essential role emotions play in teachers' lives and instruction, research on teachers' emotions has not paid much attention on teachers' emotions in the context of daily teaching. This paper explored elementary teachers' emotions while preparing for teaching and during teaching mathematics, reasons that underlie these emotions, and the relationship between their emotions and the quality of their mathematics instruction. Participants were seven elementary teachers working in the U.S. who participated in Holistic Individualized Coaching (HIC) professional development that consisted of five cycles of coaching over an year. For each coaching cycle, pre-coaching conversation and post-coaching conversation data were collected regarding emotions teachers felt in anticipation of teaching and during teaching retrospectively. In order to compare teachers' emotions with instructional quality, coaching sessions were video recorded and analyzed to determine the quality of instruction. Findings of this study showed that teachers reported six categories of emotions (positive, negative, neutral, blended-positive, blended-negative, and mixed), described emotions often in non-typical ways (e.g., "not nervous", "anxious but in a positive way"), and experienced mixed emotions (co-occcurence of positive and negative emotions) as the most dominant emotion. Teachers also had more positive emotions anticipating teaching than actually teaching the lesson. The reason teachers felt mixed emotions reflected the complex and context-specific nature of teaching, a phenonemenon not currently described in the teacher emotion literature. There were no clear relationships between emotional experiences and instructional quality. This study allowed participants to freely describe their authentic, complex, overlapping, and ambiguous emotions in the context of active teaching, which contributes opening up the possibilities of diversifying teacher emotion research and shows the significance and usefulness of understanding teachers' emotions related to active instruction.
考察教师情感的本质以及它们在教学行为中是如何被管理和调节的,对于评估教师教学质量至关重要。尽管情感在教师的生活和教学中起着至关重要的作用,但关于教师情感的研究在日常教学背景下对教师情感关注甚少。本文探讨了小学教师在备课和教授数学过程中的情感、这些情感背后的原因,以及他们的情感与数学教学质量之间的关系。参与者是在美国工作的七位小学教师,他们参加了整体个性化辅导(HIC)专业发展项目,该项目包括为期一年的五个辅导周期。对于每个辅导周期,收集了关于教师在预期教学和回顾教学过程中所感受到的情感的辅导前对话和辅导后对话数据。为了将教师的情感与教学质量进行比较,对辅导课程进行了录像和分析以确定教学质量。本研究的结果表明,教师报告了六种情感类别(积极、消极、中性、混合积极、混合消极和混合),经常以非典型方式描述情感(例如,“不紧张”,“焦虑但以积极的方式”),并且体验到混合情感(积极和消极情感同时出现)是最主要的情感。教师在预期教学时也比实际授课时有更多积极情绪。教师感受到混合情感的原因反映了教学的复杂和特定情境性质,这是目前教师情感文献中未描述的一种现象。情感体验与教学质量之间没有明确的关系。这项研究让参与者在积极教学的背景下自由描述他们真实、复杂、重叠和模糊的情感,这有助于开拓教师情感研究多样化的可能性,并显示了理解与积极教学相关的教师情感的重要性和实用性。