Suppr超能文献

可逆性脑血管收缩综合征:2周内进行随访影像学检查的重要性

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: the importance of follow-up imaging within 2 weeks.

作者信息

Fukaguchi Kiyomitsu, Goto Tadahiro, Fukui Hiroyuki, Sekine Ichiro, Yamagami Hiroshi

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Kamakura Japan.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Economics Graduate School of the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.

出版信息

Acute Med Surg. 2020 Sep 1;7(1):e559. doi: 10.1002/ams2.559. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

AIM

In patients with thunderclap headaches, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) should be considered as a differential diagnosis. However, RCVS diagnosis in the emergency department (ED) remains challenging. This report describes the clinical features and factors related to RCVS diagnosis and suggests diagnostic strategies for its management.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of eight patients diagnosed with RCVS from January 2010 to March 2019 (aged 18-69 years, 5 women).

RESULTS

The median duration from the ED visit to RCVS diagnosis was 6 days (range, 1-11 days). Of the eight patients, seven were middle-aged, six had apparent triggers, six had subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), five had high systolic blood pressure, and none had any specific abnormality observed upon physical examination. At the initial visit, RCVS was diagnosed in only one patient who had a history of RCVS. Of the other patients, SAH was diagnosed in two, and primary headache was diagnosed in four patients with negative computed tomography (CT) findings. Based on follow-up angiography (e.g., magnetic resonance angiography), seven of eight patients with convexal SAH were diagnosed with RCVS (as the cause of SAH).

CONCLUSION

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome with negative CT findings at the ED visit was likely to be misdiagnosed as a primary headache. In patients with thunderclap headache and negative CT findings, physicians should consider RCVS as a differential diagnosis, inform patients of the risk of RCVS, and undertake follow-up imaging within 2 weeks.

摘要

目的

对于霹雳样头痛患者,应考虑将可逆性脑血管收缩综合征(RCVS)作为鉴别诊断。然而,在急诊科(ED)诊断RCVS仍然具有挑战性。本报告描述了与RCVS诊断相关的临床特征和因素,并提出了其管理的诊断策略。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2010年1月至2019年3月期间诊断为RCVS的8例患者的病历(年龄18 - 69岁,5例女性)。

结果

从急诊就诊到RCVS诊断的中位时间为6天(范围1 - 11天)。8例患者中,7例为中年,6例有明显诱因,6例有蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH),5例收缩压高,体格检查均未发现任何特异性异常。初次就诊时,只有1例有RCVS病史的患者被诊断为RCVS。其他患者中,2例被诊断为SAH,4例CT检查结果阴性的患者被诊断为原发性头痛。基于后续血管造影(如磁共振血管造影),8例脑凸面SAH患者中有7例被诊断为RCVS(作为SAH的病因)。

结论

急诊就诊时CT检查结果阴性的可逆性脑血管收缩综合征很可能被误诊为原发性头痛。对于霹雳样头痛且CT检查结果阴性的患者,医生应考虑将RCVS作为鉴别诊断,告知患者RCVS的风险,并在2周内进行后续影像学检查。

相似文献

5
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome at the emergency department.急诊科的可逆性脑血管收缩综合征
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2015 Dec 28;2(4):203-209. doi: 10.15441/ceem.15.099. eCollection 2015 Dec.
10
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome identification of prognostic factors.可逆性脑血管收缩综合征预后因素的识别
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;115(11):2351-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

2
Managing Patients With Nontraumatic, Severe, Rapid-Onset Headache.非创伤性、严重、急性头痛患者的管理
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;71(3):400-408. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.04.044.
7
Thunderclap headache.霹雳样头痛
BMJ. 2013 Jan 8;346:e8557. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e8557.
8
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome.可逆性脑血管收缩综合征。
Lancet Neurol. 2012 Oct;11(10):906-17. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70135-7.
9
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes: analysis of 139 cases.可逆性脑血管收缩综合征:139例分析
Arch Neurol. 2011 Aug;68(8):1005-12. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.68. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验