Di Cara Nina H, Boyd Andy, Tanner Alastair R, Al Baghal Tarek, Calderwood Lisa, Sloan Luke S, Davis Oliver S P, Haworth Claire M A
MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UNITED KINGDOM, BS8 2BN, UK.
Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Aug 12;5:44. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15755.2. eCollection 2020.
Cohort studies gather huge volumes of information about a range of phenotypes but new sources of information such as social media data are yet to be integrated. Participant's long-term engagement with cohort studies, as well as the potential for their social media data to be linked to other longitudinal data, may give participants a unique perspective on the acceptability of this growing research area. Two focus groups explored participant views towards the acceptability and best practice for the collection of social media data for research purposes. Participants were drawn from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children cohort; individuals from the index cohort of young people (N=9) and from the parent generation (N=5) took part in two separate 90-minute focus groups. The discussions were audio recorded and subjected to qualitative analysis. : Participants were generally supportive of the collection of social media data to facilitate health and social research. They felt that their trust in the cohort study would encourage them to do so. Concern was expressed about the collection of data from friends or connections who had not consented. In terms of best practice for collecting the data, participants generally preferred the use of anonymous data derived from social media to be shared with researchers. : Cohort studies have trusting relationships with their participants; for this relationship to extend to linking their social media data with longitudinal information, procedural safeguards are needed. Participants understand the goals and potential of research integrating social media data into cohort studies, but further research is required on the acquisition of their friend's data. The views gathered from participants provide important guidance for future work seeking to integrate social media in cohort studies.
队列研究收集了大量关于一系列表型的信息,但社交媒体数据等新的信息来源尚未被整合。参与者对队列研究的长期参与,以及他们的社交媒体数据与其他纵向数据相链接的可能性,可能会让参与者对这个不断发展的研究领域的可接受性有独特的见解。两个焦点小组探讨了参与者对为研究目的收集社交媒体数据的可接受性和最佳实践的看法。参与者来自埃文亲子纵向研究队列;来自年轻人索引队列的个体(N = 9)和来自父母一代的个体(N = 5)参加了两个单独的90分钟焦点小组。讨论进行了录音并进行了定性分析。参与者普遍支持收集社交媒体数据以促进健康和社会研究。他们觉得对队列研究的信任会促使他们这样做。对于从未经同意的朋友或联系人那里收集数据表示了担忧。在收集数据的最佳实践方面,参与者普遍倾向于将从社交媒体获取的匿名数据与研究人员共享。队列研究与参与者建立了信任关系;为了将这种关系扩展到将他们的社交媒体数据与纵向信息相链接,需要程序保障措施。参与者理解将社交媒体数据整合到队列研究中的研究目标和潜力,但在获取其朋友的数据方面还需要进一步研究。从参与者那里收集到的观点为未来试图将社交媒体整合到队列研究中的工作提供了重要指导。