Suppr超能文献

分娩时行切开术对 III 型女性外阴残割/切割的移民索马里和苏丹妇女分娩结局的影响。

Labour outcomes with defibulation at delivery in immigrant Somali and Sudanese women with type III female genital mutilation/cutting.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia 9665056025.

Department of Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, and Tromso University, Norway.

出版信息

Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Aug 24;150:w20326. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20326.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is a scarcity of studies on labour outcomes with defibulation. This study assessed the outcomes of labour with defibulation at delivery in women with type III female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) compared to labour without defibulation.

METHODS

We identified and reviewed the records of all Somali and Sudanese women who delivered at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between January 2012 and December 2016. Labour outcomes of women with type III FGM/C who delivered vaginally with defibulation at delivery were compared to the outcomes of women without type III FGM/C who delivered vaginally without defibulation. Data extracted from the records included demographics, registration status, and labour outcomes.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1086 Somali and Sudanese women delivered at our institution, with 42% delivering by caesarean section. Among the 631 women with vaginal delivery, 27% had type III FGM/C and delivered with defibulation while 73% did not have type III FGM/C and delivered without defibulation. Demographic and clinical factors were similar between the two groups who delivered vaginally. The outcomes of labour with defibulation at delivery in women with type III FGM/C were not different from women without defibulation, except in regards to instrumental delivery and maternal blood loss. There were also no statistically significant differences between the two groups in neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Defibulation at delivery is an effective minor surgical procedure that should be in the armamentarium of the healthcare providers managing women with type III FGM/C.   &nbsp.

摘要

介绍

关于切开术分娩结局的研究很少。本研究评估了与未切开术分娩相比,III 型女性生殖器切割/切割(FGM/C)女性分娩时切开术的分娩结局。

方法

我们确定并回顾了 2012 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月在沙特阿拉伯吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医院分娩的所有索马里和苏丹女性的记录。比较了具有 III 型 FGM/C 的女性在分娩时经阴道切开术分娩与未行 III 型 FGM/C 的女性在分娩时未经阴道切开术分娩的分娩结局。从记录中提取的数据包括人口统计学、注册状态和分娩结局。

结果

在研究期间,我院共有 1086 名索马里和苏丹女性分娩,其中 42%通过剖宫产分娩。在 631 名经阴道分娩的女性中,27%患有 III 型 FGM/C,行切开术分娩,73%未患有 III 型 FGM/C,行非切开术分娩。两组经阴道分娩的人口统计学和临床因素相似。具有 III 型 FGM/C 的女性在分娩时行切开术的分娩结局与未行切开术的女性无差异,除了器械分娩和产妇失血方面。两组新生儿结局也无统计学差异。

结论

分娩时切开术是一种有效的小手术,应成为管理 III 型 FGM/C 女性的医疗保健提供者的治疗手段之一。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验