• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分娩时行切开术对 III 型女性外阴残割/切割的移民索马里和苏丹妇女分娩结局的影响。

Labour outcomes with defibulation at delivery in immigrant Somali and Sudanese women with type III female genital mutilation/cutting.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia 9665056025.

Department of Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, and Tromso University, Norway.

出版信息

Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Aug 24;150:w20326. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20326.

DOI:10.4414/smw.2020.20326
PMID:32905609
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is a scarcity of studies on labour outcomes with defibulation. This study assessed the outcomes of labour with defibulation at delivery in women with type III female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) compared to labour without defibulation.

METHODS

We identified and reviewed the records of all Somali and Sudanese women who delivered at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between January 2012 and December 2016. Labour outcomes of women with type III FGM/C who delivered vaginally with defibulation at delivery were compared to the outcomes of women without type III FGM/C who delivered vaginally without defibulation. Data extracted from the records included demographics, registration status, and labour outcomes.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1086 Somali and Sudanese women delivered at our institution, with 42% delivering by caesarean section. Among the 631 women with vaginal delivery, 27% had type III FGM/C and delivered with defibulation while 73% did not have type III FGM/C and delivered without defibulation. Demographic and clinical factors were similar between the two groups who delivered vaginally. The outcomes of labour with defibulation at delivery in women with type III FGM/C were not different from women without defibulation, except in regards to instrumental delivery and maternal blood loss. There were also no statistically significant differences between the two groups in neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Defibulation at delivery is an effective minor surgical procedure that should be in the armamentarium of the healthcare providers managing women with type III FGM/C.   &nbsp.

摘要

介绍

关于切开术分娩结局的研究很少。本研究评估了与未切开术分娩相比,III 型女性生殖器切割/切割(FGM/C)女性分娩时切开术的分娩结局。

方法

我们确定并回顾了 2012 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月在沙特阿拉伯吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医院分娩的所有索马里和苏丹女性的记录。比较了具有 III 型 FGM/C 的女性在分娩时经阴道切开术分娩与未行 III 型 FGM/C 的女性在分娩时未经阴道切开术分娩的分娩结局。从记录中提取的数据包括人口统计学、注册状态和分娩结局。

结果

在研究期间,我院共有 1086 名索马里和苏丹女性分娩,其中 42%通过剖宫产分娩。在 631 名经阴道分娩的女性中,27%患有 III 型 FGM/C,行切开术分娩,73%未患有 III 型 FGM/C,行非切开术分娩。两组经阴道分娩的人口统计学和临床因素相似。具有 III 型 FGM/C 的女性在分娩时行切开术的分娩结局与未行切开术的女性无差异,除了器械分娩和产妇失血方面。两组新生儿结局也无统计学差异。

结论

分娩时切开术是一种有效的小手术,应成为管理 III 型 FGM/C 女性的医疗保健提供者的治疗手段之一。

相似文献

1
Labour outcomes with defibulation at delivery in immigrant Somali and Sudanese women with type III female genital mutilation/cutting.分娩时行切开术对 III 型女性外阴残割/切割的移民索马里和苏丹妇女分娩结局的影响。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Aug 24;150:w20326. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20326.
2
The use of intrapartum defibulation in women with female genital mutilation.对患有女性生殖器切割的妇女在分娩时进行解除纤维性粘连的操作。
BJOG. 2001 Sep;108(9):949-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00227.x.
3
Defibulation during vaginal delivery for women with type III female genital mutilation.对行 III 度女性生殖器官切割的女性在阴道分娩时行切开术。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;120(1):98-103. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182590343.
4
Obstetric care of women with female genital mutilation attending a specialized clinic in a tertiary center.在三级医疗中心的一家专科诊所接受治疗的女性生殖器切割女性的产科护理。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Feb;132(2):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.055. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
5
The effectiveness of surgical interventions for women with FGM/C: a systematic review.女性外阴残割/切割手术干预的效果:系统评价。
BJOG. 2018 Feb;125(3):278-287. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14839. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
6
Survey on female genital mutilation/cutting in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯吉达市女性生殖器切割/切割调查。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 1;9(5):e024684. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024684.
7
Effects of female genital mutilation on birth outcomes in Switzerland.女性生殖器切割对瑞士出生结局的影响。
BJOG. 2009 Aug;116(9):1204-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02215.x. Epub 2009 May 14.
8
Reasons for and Experiences With Surgical Interventions for Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C): A Systematic Review.女性生殖器切割手术干预的原因及经历:一项系统综述
J Sex Med. 2017 Aug;14(8):977-990. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
9
Obstetric outcomes for women with female genital mutilation at an Australian hospital, 2006-2012: a descriptive study.2006 - 2012年澳大利亚一家医院女性生殖器切割女性的产科结局:一项描述性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 28;16(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1123-5.
10
Retraction technique for urinary catheterization of women with female genital mutilation.女性生殖器切割女性导尿的撤回技术。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Jul;169(2):296-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.02.020. Epub 2013 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Female Genital Mutilation in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review.沙特阿拉伯的女性生殖器切割:一项系统综述
Cureus. 2021 Nov 6;13(11):e19300. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19300. eCollection 2021 Nov.