Okubo Takahisa, Ikeda Takayuki, Saruta Juri, Tsukimura Naoki, Hirota Makoto, Ogawa Takahiro
Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, Division of Advanced Prosthodontics, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA 90090-1668, USA.
Department of Partial Denture Prosthodontics, Nihon University School of Dentistry, 1-8-13 Kanda Surugadai, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8310, Japan.
Materials (Basel). 2020 Sep 7;13(18):3946. doi: 10.3390/ma13183946.
Titanium-based implant abutments and tissue bars are polished during the finalization. We hypothesized that polishing degrades the bioactivity of titanium, and, if this is the case, photofunctionalization-grade UV treatment can alleviate the adverse effect. Three groups of titanium disks were prepared; machined surface, polished surface and polished surface followed by UV treatment (polished/UV surface). Polishing was performed by the sequential use of greenstone and silicon rubber burs. UV treatment was performed using a UV device for 12 min. Hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity was examined by the contact angle of ddHO. The surface morphology and chemistry of titanium were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), respectively. Human epithelium cells were seeded on titanium disks. The number of cells attached, the spreading behavior of cells and the retention on titanium surfaces were examined. The polished surfaces were smooth with only minor scratches, while the machined surfaces showed traces and metal flashes made by machine-turning. The polished surfaces showed a significantly increased percentage of surface carbon compared to machined surfaces. The carbon percentage on polished/UV surfaces was even lower than that on machined surfaces. A silicon element was detected on polished surfaces but not on polished/UV surfaces. Both machined and polished surfaces were hydrophobic, whereas polished/UV surfaces were hydrophilic. The number of attached cells after 24 h of incubation was 60% lower on polished surfaces than on machined surfaces. The number of attached cells on polished/UV surfaces was even higher than that on machined surfaces. The size and perimeter of cells, which was significantly reduced on polished surfaces, were fully restored on polished/UV surfaces. The number of cells remained adherent after mechanical detachment was reduced to half on polished surfaces compared to machined surfaces. The number of adherent cells on polished/UV surfaces was two times higher than on machined surfaces. In conclusion, polishing titanium causes chemical contamination, while smoothing its surface significantly compromised the attachment and retention of human epithelial cells. The UV treatment of polished titanium surfaces reversed these adverse effects and even outperformed the inherent bioactivity of the original titanium.
钛基种植体基台和组织杆在最终加工过程中进行抛光处理。我们推测抛光会降低钛的生物活性,如果是这样,光功能化级紫外线处理可以减轻这种不利影响。制备了三组钛盘;机械加工表面、抛光表面以及抛光表面后进行紫外线处理(抛光/紫外线表面)。使用青石和硅橡胶车针依次进行抛光。使用紫外线设备进行12分钟的紫外线处理。通过去离子水(ddHO)的接触角来检测疏水性/亲水性。分别通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和X射线光电子能谱(XPS)检查钛的表面形态和化学性质。将人上皮细胞接种在钛盘上。检查附着的细胞数量、细胞的铺展行为以及在钛表面的留存情况。抛光表面光滑,只有轻微划痕,而机械加工表面则显示出机械车削留下的痕迹和金属碎屑。与机械加工表面相比,抛光表面的表面碳百分比显著增加。抛光/紫外线表面的碳百分比甚至低于机械加工表面。在抛光表面检测到硅元素,而在抛光/紫外线表面未检测到。机械加工表面和抛光表面均为疏水性,而抛光/紫外线表面为亲水性。培养24小时后,抛光表面上附着的细胞数量比机械加工表面少60%。抛光/紫外线表面上附着的细胞数量甚至高于机械加工表面。在抛光表面显著减小的细胞大小和周长在抛光/紫外线表面完全恢复。与机械加工表面相比,机械剥离后仍附着在抛光表面的细胞数量减少到一半。抛光/紫外线表面上附着的细胞数量比机械加工表面高两倍。总之,对钛进行抛光会导致化学污染,同时使其表面光滑会显著损害人上皮细胞的附着和留存。对抛光后的钛表面进行紫外线处理可逆转这些不利影响,甚至优于原始钛的固有生物活性。