• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科应对 COVID-19 准备情况:法国的一项横断面研究。

COVID-19 Preparedness Among Emergency Departments: A Cross-Sectional Study in France.

机构信息

Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Bichat, Emergency Department, Paris, France.

Study Group for Efficiency and Quality of Emergency Departments and Non-Scheduled Activities Departments, Paris, France.

出版信息

Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Feb;16(1):245-253. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.331. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1017/dmp.2020.331
PMID:32907674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7596573/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate hospital and emergency department (ED) preparedness in France facing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) rapid growth epidemic-phase, and to determine the link between preparedness and responsiveness.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, from March 7 to March 11, 2020, all heads of ED departments in France were contacted to answer an electronic survey, including 23 questions. Quality, Organization, Training, Resources, Management, Interoperability, and Responsiveness were evaluated by calculating scores (10 points). Multivariate analysis of variance was used to compare scores. Spearman's correlation coefficient and multifaceted regression analysis were performed between Responsiveness and dimensions scores.

RESULTS

A total of 287 of 636 French EDs were included (45.1%). Calculated scores showed (median): Quality 5.38; Organization 6.4; Training 4.6; Resources 4.13; Management 2.38; Interoperability 4.0; Responsiveness 6.25; seasonal influenza score was 5. Significant differences between scores as a function of hospital and ED main characteristics were found. Furthermore, we found significant correlations (P < 0.01) between Responsiveness and all preparedness dimensions. Organization (adjusted-R2 0.2897), Management (aR2 0.321), and Interoperability (aR2 0.422) were significantly associated with Responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Preparedness in all its dimensions is low, indicating vulnerability. Preparedness and responsiveness face a certain and ongoing risk are close linked, and that Organizational, Management, and Interoperability dimensions are main determinants.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估法国医院和急诊科(ED)在应对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)快速增长流行阶段的准备情况,并确定准备情况与反应能力之间的联系。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,于 2020 年 3 月 7 日至 3 月 11 日联系了法国所有 ED 部门的负责人回答电子调查,共包括 23 个问题。通过计算得分(10 分)来评估质量、组织、培训、资源、管理、互操作性和反应能力。采用方差分析对得分进行多变量分析。采用 Spearman 相关系数和多方面回归分析对反应能力和各维度得分之间的关系进行分析。

结果

共纳入 636 家法国 ED 中的 287 家(45.1%)。计算出的得分显示(中位数):质量 5.38;组织 6.4;培训 4.6;资源 4.13;管理 2.38;互操作性 4.0;反应能力 6.25;季节性流感得分 5。发现医院和 ED 主要特征的得分存在显著差异。此外,我们发现反应能力与所有准备维度之间存在显著相关性(P<0.01)。组织(调整后的 R2 0.2897)、管理(aR2 0.321)和互操作性(aR2 0.422)与反应能力显著相关。

结论

所有维度的准备工作都很低,表明存在脆弱性。准备工作和反应能力面临一定的和持续的风险,组织、管理和互操作性维度是主要决定因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddbd/7596573/b047ee31dbcc/S1935789320003316_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddbd/7596573/b047ee31dbcc/S1935789320003316_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddbd/7596573/b047ee31dbcc/S1935789320003316_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
COVID-19 Preparedness Among Emergency Departments: A Cross-Sectional Study in France.急诊科应对 COVID-19 准备情况:法国的一项横断面研究。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Feb;16(1):245-253. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.331. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
2
Pandemic influenza and major disease outbreak preparedness in US emergency departments: a survey of medical directors and department chairs.美国急诊科应对大流行性流感和重大疾病爆发的准备情况:对医疗主任和科室主任的调查
Am J Disaster Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;4(4):199-206.
3
Pandemic influenza and major disease outbreak preparedness in US emergency departments: A survey of medical directors and department chairs.美国急诊科应对大流行性流感和重大疾病爆发的准备情况:对医务主任和科室主任的调查
Am J Disaster Med. 2020;14(4):279-286. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.2019.0341.
4
Pandemic planning and response in academic pediatric emergency departments during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic.2009 年 H1N1 流感大流行期间,学术型儿科急诊部门的大流行规划和应对。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):54-62. doi: 10.1111/acem.12061.
5
Pandemic influenza and major disease outbreak preparedness in US emergency departments: A selected survey of emergency health professionals.美国急诊科应对大流行性流感和重大疾病爆发的准备情况:对急诊医疗专业人员的抽样调查
Am J Disaster Med. 2020;14(4):269-277. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.2019.0340.
6
How Do Doctors and Nurses in Emergency Departments in Hong Kong View Their Disaster Preparedness? A Cross-Sectional Territory-Wide Online Survey.香港急诊科医生和护士如何看待他们的灾难准备工作?一项全港范围的横断面在线调查。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018 Jun;12(3):329-336. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2017.71. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
7
Assessment of the Preparedness and Planning of Academic Emergency Departments in India During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multicentric Survey.COVID-19大流行期间印度学术急诊科的准备情况与规划评估:一项多中心调查
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Oct;16(5):1910-1915. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.73. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
8
Adaptation of ED design layout during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey.新冠疫情期间急诊科设计布局的调整:一项全国性横断面调查
Emerg Med J. 2021 Oct;38(10):789-793. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-211012. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
9
A survey of emergency department 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) surge preparedness--Atlanta, Georgia, July-October 2009.2009 年大流行性流感 A(H1N1)疫情应急准备情况调查——佐治亚州亚特兰大,2009 年 7 月至 10 月。
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Jan 1;52 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S177-82. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq035.
10
Survey of Emergency Department Chemical Hazard Preparedness in Michigan, USA: A Seven Year Comparison.美国密歇根州急诊科化学危害防范情况调查:七年对比
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Apr;31(2):224-7. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16000108. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Audit of preparedness of selected military hospital in the face of biological threats: action research study.选定军事医院应对生物威胁准备情况的审计:行动研究
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Dec 18;17(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00786-z.
2
Development and validation of a lockdown preparedness scale: Understanding lockdown preparedness through a social vulnerability perspective.封锁准备量表的开发与验证:从社会脆弱性视角理解封锁准备情况
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022 Nov;82:103367. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103367. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
3
Quality of the Healthcare Services During COVID-19 Pandemic in Selected European Countries.
在选定的欧洲国家,COVID-19 大流行期间的医疗服务质量。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 12;10:870314. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.870314. eCollection 2022.
4
Preparations of Dutch emergency departments for the COVID-19 pandemic: A questionnaire-based study.荷兰急诊科应对 COVID-19 大流行的准备情况:一项基于问卷调查的研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0256982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256982. eCollection 2021.
5
Analysis of the Feasibility of a Vaccination Campaign against Influenza Epidemic and COVID-19 Pandemic in French Emergency Departments: A National Survey.法国急诊科针对流感流行和新冠疫情开展疫苗接种活动的可行性分析:一项全国性调查。
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Apr 19;9(4):400. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9040400.