Suppr超能文献

超声造影对良恶性软组织肿块鉴别诊断的价值:Meta 分析。

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Differential Diagnosis of Malignant and Benign Soft Tissue Masses: A Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Department of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Dec;46(12):3179-3187. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Sep 6.

Abstract

This meta-analysis was aimed at investigating the value of using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant soft tissue masses (STMs). Relevant studies published before March 24, 2020 were identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane and Web of Science. According to the inclusion criteria, five studies were selected comprising 746 patients. In the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant STMs, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of CEUS were 76% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71%-81%; heterogeneity [I] = 74.5%) and 67% (95% CI: 62%-71%; I = 36.5%), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio was 7.37 (95% CI: 3.78%-14.35; I = 66.6%). The overall area under the curve was 0.77 (standard error: 0.0392). Subgroup analysis revealed that different index tests of CEUS resulted in different diagnostic performance. Importantly, CEUS is an effective method for the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant STMs.

摘要

本荟萃分析旨在探讨对比增强超声(CEUS)在鉴别诊断良恶性软组织肿块(STM)中的价值。通过全面检索 PubMed、Ovid、Cochrane 和 Web of Science,检索到截至 2020 年 3 月 24 日之前发表的相关研究。根据纳入标准,共选择了 5 项研究,包含 746 例患者。在鉴别诊断良恶性 STM 中,CEUS 的汇总敏感度和特异度分别为 76%(95%可信区间:71%-81%;异质性 [I] = 74.5%)和 67%(95%可信区间:62%-71%;I = 36.5%)。诊断比值比为 7.37(95%可信区间:3.78%-14.35;I = 66.6%)。整体曲线下面积为 0.77(标准误:0.0392)。亚组分析显示,CEUS 的不同指标检测结果导致诊断性能存在差异。重要的是,CEUS 是鉴别诊断良恶性 STM 的有效方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验