Gao Catherine A, Bailey Joseph Isaac, Walter James M, Coleman John M, Malsin Elizabeth S, Argento A Christine, Prickett Michelle H, Wunderink Richard G, Smith Sean B
medRxiv. 2020 Sep 2:2020.08.30.20177543. doi: 10.1101/2020.08.30.20177543.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic raised concern for exposure to healthcare providers through aerosol generating procedures, such as bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Current society guidelines recommended limiting use of BAL to reduce operators' risk for infection, yet data on the infection rate for providers after BAL is sparse. Since March 2020, our institution used a modified protocol to perform over 450 BALs on intubated COVID-19 patients. We therefore sought to describe the subsequent infectious risks to providers associated with BAL.
Fifty-two pulmonary and critical care providers (faculty and fellows) at our tertiary-care, urban medical center were surveyed. Survey participants were asked to provide the number of BALs on COVID-19 patients they performed, the number of weeks they cared for intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19, and the results of any SARS-CoV-2 testing that they received. Participants were asked to assess the difficulty of BAL on intubated COVID-19 patients as compared to routine ICU BAL using a numeric perceived difficulty score ranging from 1 (easier) to 10 (harder).
We received forty-seven responses from fifty-two surveyed (90% response rate), with 2 declining to participate. Many respondents (19/45, 42%) spent >5 weeks on an ICU service with COVID-19 patients. The number of BALs performed by providers ranged from 0 to >60. Sixteen of the 35 providers (46%) who performed BALs underwent at least one nasopharyngeal (NP) swab to test for SARS-CoV-2, but none were positive. Twenty-seven of the 35 providers (77%) who performed BALs underwent SARS-CoV-2 serology testing, and only one (3.7%) was positive. Respondents indicated occasionally not being able to follow aerosol-minimizing steps but overall felt BALs in COVID-19 patients was only slightly more difficult than routine ICU BAL.
At a high-volume center having performed >450 BALs on intubated COVID-19 patients with aerosol-limiting precautions, our survey of bronchoscopists found no positive NP SARS-CoV-2 tests and only one positive antibody test result. While the optimal role for COVID-19 BAL remains to be determined, these data suggest that BAL can be safely performed in intubated COVID-19 patients if experienced providers take precautions to limit aerosol generation and wear personal protective equipment.
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行引发了人们对通过诸如支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)等产生气溶胶的操作导致医护人员暴露的担忧。当前的社会指南建议限制BAL的使用以降低操作人员的感染风险,但关于BAL后医护人员感染率的数据却很稀少。自2020年3月以来,我们机构采用了一种改良方案,对插管的COVID-19患者进行了超过450次BAL。因此,我们试图描述与BAL相关的医护人员后续感染风险。
对我们这家位于城市的三级医疗中心的52名肺科和重症监护医护人员(教员和研究员)进行了调查。调查参与者被要求提供他们对COVID-19患者进行BAL的次数、他们照顾COVID-19重症监护病房(ICU)患者的周数,以及他们接受的任何SARS-CoV-2检测结果。参与者被要求使用从1(更容易)到10(更难)的数字感知难度评分来评估对插管的COVID-19患者进行BAL与常规ICU BAL相比的难度。
我们收到了52名被调查者中的47份回复(回复率90%),2人拒绝参与。许多受访者(19/45,42%)在ICU为COVID-19患者服务超过5周。医护人员进行BAL的次数从0次到超过60次不等。进行BAL的35名医护人员中有16人(46%)至少接受了一次鼻咽(NP)拭子检测以检测SARS-CoV-2,但均为阴性。进行BAL的35名医护人员中有2