• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝外胆管癌肿瘤分化评分的组织学评估及预后:一种新的组织学分级系统的建议。

Histological evaluation of tumor differentiation score and prognosis of extrahepatic bile duct cancer: A proposal for a new histological grading system.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi-ken, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi-ken, Japan.

出版信息

Pathol Int. 2020 Nov;70(11):857-864. doi: 10.1111/pin.13014. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1111/pin.13014
PMID:32909295
Abstract

Extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) cancer is a devastating cancer, and more common in Asian countries than in Western countries. Histological grading continues to be a highly relevant factor in prognosis and management of many kinds of cancer, however no uniform histological grading system exists for EHBD cancer. Histological heterogeneity within tumors is a problem in the evaluation of EHBD cancer. We developed an EHBD histological grading scheme to evaluate tumor differentiation pattern, and statistically analyzed its relationship with prognosis. In the present study, 257 surgically resected EHBD cancers were reviewed and their histological glandular differentiation (HGD) pattern was scored, and then we summed up the most and second most predominant scores. These scores were statistically analyzed for their relationship with patient prognosis. Patients showed a trend of shortening recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in association with higher HGD scores. In multivariate analyses, HGD score was determined to be an influential factor in RFS (P = 0.00041) and OS (P < 0.0001). In addition, combining HGD score and lymph node status correctly stratified patient prognosis in RFS. In conclusion, this new HGD scoring system is highly practical and has powerful prognostic value for EHBD cancer.

摘要

肝外胆管(EHBD)癌是一种毁灭性的癌症,在亚洲国家比在西方国家更为常见。组织学分级在许多癌症的预后和治疗中仍然是一个非常重要的因素,然而,EHBD 癌没有统一的组织学分级系统。肿瘤内的组织学异质性是评估 EHBD 癌的一个问题。我们开发了一种 EHBD 组织学分级方案来评估肿瘤分化模式,并对其与预后的关系进行了统计学分析。在本研究中,回顾了 257 例手术切除的 EHBD 癌,并对其组织学腺体分化(HGD)模式进行了评分,然后总结了最常见和第二常见的评分。对这些评分进行了统计学分析,以研究其与患者预后的关系。患者的无复发生存率(RFS)和总生存率(OS)与 HGD 评分的升高呈缩短趋势。多因素分析显示,HGD 评分是 RFS(P=0.00041)和 OS(P<0.0001)的一个影响因素。此外,HGD 评分与淋巴结状态相结合,可以正确分层患者的 RFS 预后。总之,这种新的 HGD 评分系统对 EHBD 癌具有高度的实用性和强大的预后价值。

相似文献

1
Histological evaluation of tumor differentiation score and prognosis of extrahepatic bile duct cancer: A proposal for a new histological grading system.肝外胆管癌肿瘤分化评分的组织学评估及预后:一种新的组织学分级系统的建议。
Pathol Int. 2020 Nov;70(11):857-864. doi: 10.1111/pin.13014. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
2
The Prognostic Importance of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes for Patients Undergoing Curative Resection Followed by Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer.接受根治性切除并辅助放化疗的肝外胆管癌患者中,转移淋巴结数量的预后重要性
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Oct;19(10):1833-41. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2898-9. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
3
Surgical strategy for T2 and T3 gallbladder cancer: is extrahepatic bile duct resection always necessary?T2 和 T3 期胆囊癌的手术策略:是否需要行肝外胆管切除术?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Dec;398(8):1137-44. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1120-3. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
4
Clinicopathological analysis and prognosis of extrahepatic bile duct cancer with a microscopic positive ductal margin.肝外胆管癌切缘镜下阳性的临床病理分析及预后
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Jun;16(6):575-81. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12193. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
5
High expression of MMP-9 is associated with better prognosis in extrahepatic bile duct cancer patients.MMP-9 高表达与肝外胆管癌患者的预后较好相关。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 May;44(5):638-643. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
6
Patterns of failure after resection of extrahepatic bile duct cancer: implications for adjuvant radiotherapy indication and treatment volumes.肝外胆管癌切除术后失败模式:辅助放疗适应证和治疗体积的影响。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 May 8;13(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1024-z.
7
The Comparison of Inflammation-Based Prognostic Scores in Patients With Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.胰十二指肠切除术后肝外胆管癌患者基于炎症的预后评分比较。
J Surg Res. 2019 Jun;238:102-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.033. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
8
Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after curative resection for extrahepatic bile duct cancer: a long-term single center experience.根治性切除术后辅助放化疗治疗肝外胆管癌:长期单中心经验。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr;35(2):136-40. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318209aa29.
9
Relationship between the surgical margin status, prognosis, and recurrence in extrahepatic bile duct cancer patients.肝外胆管癌患者手术切缘状态、预后和复发之间的关系。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Feb;402(1):87-93. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1491-3. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
10
Impact of adjuvant radiation therapy for microscopic residual tumor after resection of extrahepatic bile duct cancer.肝外胆管癌切除术后镜下残余肿瘤辅助放疗的影响。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct;36(5):461-5. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31825494ab.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic scoring system based on indicators reflecting the tumor glandular differentiation and microenvironment for patients with colorectal cancer.基于反映结直肠癌肿瘤腺分化和微环境指标的预后评分系统。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 20;14(1):14188. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65015-2.
2
Impact of Trinal Histological Glandular Differentiation Grade on the Prognosis of Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: a Multicenter Retrospective Study.三型组织学腺体分化程度对肝内胆管细胞癌患者预后的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec;27(12):2780-2786. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05852-0. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
3
Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in predicting outcome of distal cholangiocarcinoma in Thailand.
肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞在预测泰国远端胆管癌预后中的意义
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 13;12:1004220. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1004220. eCollection 2022.
4
knockdown enhances carcinogenesis features and aggressiveness of Caco-2 colon cancer cells: An cellular mechanism study.敲低增强Caco-2结肠癌细胞的致癌特征和侵袭性:一项细胞机制研究。
J Cancer. 2022 Jan 1;13(2):373-384. doi: 10.7150/jca.65511. eCollection 2022.