Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AK, USA.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Jan;56(1):6-19. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12567. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
Although discourse-level assessments contribute to predicting real-world performance in persons with aphasia (PWA), the use of discourse measures is uncommon in clinical settings due to resource-heavy procedures. Moreover, assessing function word use in discourse requires the arduous procedure of defining grammatical categories for each word in language transcripts.
The purpose of this exploratory study was twofold: (1) to develop core function word lists as a clinician-friendly means of evaluating function word use in discourse; and (2) to examine the ability of the core function word measure to differentiate PWA from cognitively healthy adults and persons with fluent aphasia from non-fluent aphasia.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: The 25 most commonly used function words (core function words) were extracted from narrative language samples from 470 cognitively healthy adults, which were divided into seven age groups (20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s). The percent agreement of core function words for 11 PWA (fluent aphasia = 5; non-fluent aphasia = 6) and 11 age- and education-matched controls were then calculated. Percent agreement for the core function words produced was compared between the controls and the PWA group, and between participants with fluent aphasia and non-fluent aphasia.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: The results indicated that PWA produced fewer core function words from the lists than the control group, and that core function word use was strongly correlated with aphasia severity. Persons with non-fluent aphasia produced fewer core function words than those with fluent aphasia, although this could be a confound of aphasia classification from the use of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB)-Revised.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: Core function word lists consisting of a limited number of items for quantifying function word use in discourse remain in a nascent stage of development. However, the findings are consistent with previous studies analysing the total production of function words in language samples produced by PWA. Therefore, core function words may potentially serve as a clinician-friendly manner of quantifying function words produced in discourse. What this paper adds What is already known on the subject Function word analysis in discourse requires arduous processes of identifying the error production and grammatical category of function words in discourse. Previous studies have demonstrated that core lexicon measures are an efficient, simple means of quantifying discourse in PWA. However, function words have never been considered for generating an independent core lexicon list. What this paper adds to existing knowledge As an exploratory study, we focused primarily on developing a clinician-friendly measure to evaluate function word production in discourse, motivated by the idea of an adaptation strategy within the core lexicon framework. Our findings demonstrated that by using a simple scoring system that the core lexicon measure provides, we differentiated the control group from the PWA group, and persons with fluent aphasia from persons with non-fluent aphasia. Additionally, we found significant correlations between function word production and aphasia severity determined by WAB Aphasia Quotient (AQ). What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The results add empirical evidence for the utility of core function word lists for quantifying function word usage in discourse in PWA. Counting the presence and absence of function words in discourse will allow clinicians to avoid labour-intensive preparatory work, and to obtain useful diagnostic information in a less time-consuming way.
尽管话语层面的评估有助于预测失语症患者(PWA)在现实世界中的表现,但由于程序资源密集,在临床环境中使用话语测量并不常见。此外,评估话语中功能词的使用需要为语言记录中的每个词定义语法类别,这是一项艰巨的任务。
本探索性研究有两个目的:(1)开发核心功能词列表,作为评估话语中功能词使用的一种方便临床医生的方法;(2)研究核心功能词测量在区分 PWA 与认知健康成年人以及流利性失语症与非流利性失语症患者方面的能力。
从 470 名认知健康成年人的叙事语言样本中提取了 25 个最常用的功能词(核心功能词),并将其分为七个年龄组(20 多岁、30 多岁、40 多岁、50 多岁、60 多岁、70 多岁和 80 多岁)。然后计算了 11 名 PWA(流利性失语症=5 名;非流利性失语症=6 名)和 11 名年龄和教育程度匹配的对照者的核心功能词的百分一致率。将对照组和 PWA 组之间以及流利性失语症和非流利性失语症患者之间产生的核心功能词的百分一致率进行了比较。
结果表明,PWA 从列表中产生的核心功能词比对照组少,而且核心功能词的使用与失语症严重程度密切相关。非流利性失语症患者产生的核心功能词比流利性失语症患者少,尽管这可能是由于使用西方失语症成套测验修订版(WAB-R)对失语症进行分类的混淆。
用于在话语中量化功能词使用的核心功能词列表的数量有限,仍处于萌芽阶段。然而,这些发现与分析 PWA 语言样本中功能词总产生的先前研究一致。因此,核心功能词可能有可能作为一种方便临床医生的方式来量化话语中产生的功能词。本文的贡献是什么?
话语中的功能词分析需要艰苦的过程,即识别话语中功能词的错误产生和语法类别。先前的研究已经表明,核心词汇测量是一种高效、简单的方法,可以量化 PWA 中的话语。然而,核心词汇从未被考虑用于生成独立的核心词汇列表。
作为一项探索性研究,我们主要关注开发一种方便临床医生的测量方法来评估话语中的功能词生成,这是基于核心词汇框架中的适应策略的想法。我们的研究结果表明,通过使用简单的评分系统,即核心词汇测量法,我们可以将对照组与 PWA 组以及流利性失语症患者与非流利性失语症患者区分开来。此外,我们还发现功能词生成与 WAB 失语症商数(AQ)确定的失语症严重程度之间存在显著相关性。
这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?
研究结果为在 PWA 中使用核心功能词列表量化话语中功能词使用提供了经验证据。在话语中计算功能词的存在和缺失将使临床医生避免繁琐的准备工作,并以更省时的方式获得有用的诊断信息。