Zagzoog Nirmeen, Alsunbul Waleed, Elgheriani Ali, Takroni Radwan, Reddy Kesava
Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Graduate School of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2020 Nov;81(6):513-520. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688561. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
Tubular approach surgery now includes complex spinal and cranial procedures. Aided by modified instrumentation and frameless stereotaxy, minimal access surgery is being offered for a growing array of neurosurgical conditions.
This article explores the flexibility and adaptability of the tubular retractor system for multiple indications by highlighting the 12-year experience of the primary surgeon using a tubular retractor system reported for the entire neuroaxis including intracranial, foramen magnum, and the craniocaudal extent of the spine for intra- and extradural pathologies. For this article we have not analyzed our experience with degenerative spinal disease. Patient characteristics, pathology, resection results, length of hospital stay, and complications are discussed.
From August 2005 through March 2017, 538 patients underwent neurosurgical procedures with mini-tubular access. Of these, the 127 patients who underwent mini-tubular access operations for nontraditional indications are discussed here. There were 65 women and 61 men with an average age of 53.5 years. The cases by anatomical location are as follows: 27 cranial cases, 11 foramen magnum decompressions, and 89 for spinal indications. The cranial pathologies included primary and metastatic tumors. The spinal pathologies included intra- and extradural spinal tumors, spina bifida occulta, syringomyelia, and other cystic lesions in the spine. In the vast majority of the patients where gross total resection was the goal, it was achieved. The mean length of stay was 2.94 days.
This report demonstrates that mini-tubular access surgery can be adapted to pathologies in the entire neuroaxis with outcomes that are comparable with open techniques. Limited tissue dissection, smaller incisions, and limited bone resection make the mini-tubular access approach a desirable option when feasible. Greater experience with all of these techniques is needed before the definitive status of these procedures in the neurosurgical armamentarium can be demonstrated.
管状入路手术现在包括复杂的脊柱和颅脑手术。在改良器械和无框架立体定向技术的辅助下,越来越多的神经外科疾病开始采用微创外科手术。
本文通过突出主刀医生使用管状牵开器系统12年的经验,探讨了管状牵开器系统在多种适应症中的灵活性和适应性,该经验涵盖了整个神经轴,包括颅内、枕骨大孔以及脊柱的颅尾范围,用于治疗硬膜内和硬膜外病变。在本文中,我们未分析我们在退行性脊柱疾病方面的经验。讨论了患者特征、病理、切除结果、住院时间和并发症。
从2005年8月至2017年3月,538例患者接受了微创管状入路神经外科手术。其中,本文讨论了127例因非传统适应症接受微创管状入路手术的患者。有65名女性和61名男性,平均年龄为53.5岁。按解剖位置分类的病例如下:27例颅脑病例,11例枕骨大孔减压术,89例脊柱适应症。颅脑病变包括原发性和转移性肿瘤。脊柱病变包括硬膜内和硬膜外脊柱肿瘤、隐性脊柱裂、脊髓空洞症以及脊柱的其他囊性病变。在绝大多数以全切为目标的患者中,均实现了全切。平均住院时间为2.94天。
本报告表明,微创管状入路手术可适用于整个神经轴的病变,其结果与开放手术相当。有限的组织分离、较小的切口和有限的骨切除使微创管状入路手术在可行时成为一个理想的选择。在这些手术在神经外科手术器械库中的最终地位得到证明之前,需要对所有这些技术有更多的经验。