• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[一种新的预测模型在评估乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的价值]

[Value of a new predictive model in evaluating short-term prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus related acute-on-chronic liver failure].

作者信息

Zhao Jie, Li Li, Li Xiuhui, Guo Liying, Li Qiuwei, Miao Jing, Gou Chunyan, Yang Huasheng, Luo Xiaolan, Jia Jianwei

机构信息

Department of Special Ward, Tianjin Second People's Hospital, Tianjin 300192, China.

Graduate School, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Aug;32(8):988-993. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200102-00075.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200102-00075
PMID:32912415
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish a predictive model and investigate its value in evaluating short-term prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF).

METHODS

Patients with HBV-ACLF admitted to Tianjin Second People's Hospital and Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University from May 2015 to October 2018 were enrolled. The data of gender, age, laboratory markers at admission, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and clinical complications were collected for analysis. According to the prognosis on 12-week, patients were divided into survival group and death group. Univariate analysis and binary Logistic regression analysis were used to test the risk factors for short-term prognosis of the patients with HBV-ACLF, and a prediction model was established. The accuracy of each index and the established model were verified by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

A total of 148 patients with HBV-ACLF were enrolled in the study, 91 cases survived while 57 cases died during the 12-week period. The age, total bilirubin (TBIL), neutrophil percentage (NEUT%), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), MELD score of death group were higher than those of survival group [age (years old): 50.00 (44.50, 55.00) vs. 43.00 (34.00, 53.00), TBIL (μmol/L): 310.30 (240.70, 405.70) vs. 266.40 (184.20, 360.20), NEUT%: (74.52±13.05)% vs. (66.64±12.35)%, lgHBsAg (kU/L): 3.72 (3.29, 3.92) vs. 2.97 (2.49, 3.78), MELD score: 24.27 (19.71, 27.40) vs. 21.88 (18.83, 24.38), all P < 0.05], while albumin (ALB), total cholesterol (CHO), prothrombin activity (PTA) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) were lower than those of survival group [ALB (g/L): 29.80 (27.05, 31.05) vs. 30.80 (28.00, 33.90), CHO (mmol/L): 1.98 (1.50, 2.38) vs. 2.49 (2.05, 3.01), PTA: (30.37±7.09)% vs. (32.94±6.03)%, AFP (μg/L): 21.54 (9.28, 51.54) vs. 66.16 (24.50, 152.80), all P < 0.05]. Logistic regression analysis showed that NEUT%, HBsAg and AFP were independent risk factors for short-term prognosis of patients with HBV-ACLF [odds ratio (OR) was 77.843, 1.439, 0.995, respectively, all P < 0.05]. According to the results of regression analysis, the NHA-ACLF model (NEUT%+HBsAg+AFP) was established. The formula was logit (NHA-ACLF) = -5.441+5.688×NEUT%+0.430×lgHBsAg-0.005×AFP. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the NHA-ACLF model for pred HBV-ACLF patients was 0.790, which was better than NEUT% (AUC = 0.696), lgHBsAg (AUC = 0.670), AFP (AUC = 0.703) and MELD score (AUC = 0.640). When the cut-off value of NHA-ACLF model score was 0.459, the sensitivity was 73.7%, and the specificity was 79.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

NEUT%, HBsAg and AFP are independent predictive indicator for short-term prognosis in patients with HBV-ACLF. Compared with MELD score, the risk assessment model NHA-ACLF has a greater value in predicting the short-term prognosis of patients with HBV-ACLF.

摘要

目的

建立预测模型并探讨其在评估乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭(HBV-ACLF)患者短期预后中的价值。

方法

纳入2015年5月至2018年10月在天津市第二人民医院和首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院收治的HBV-ACLF患者。收集患者的性别、年龄、入院时实验室指标、终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分及临床并发症等资料进行分析。根据12周时的预后情况,将患者分为生存组和死亡组。采用单因素分析和二元Logistic回归分析检验HBV-ACLF患者短期预后的危险因素,并建立预测模型。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线验证各指标及所建立模型的准确性。

结果

共纳入148例HBV-ACLF患者,12周内91例存活,57例死亡。死亡组患者的年龄、总胆红素(TBIL)、中性粒细胞百分比(NEUT%)、乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)、MELD评分高于生存组[年龄(岁):50.00(44.50,55.00)比43.00(34.00,53.00),TBIL(μmol/L):310.30(240.70,405.70)比266.40(184.20,360.20),NEUT%:(74.52±13.05)%比(66.64±12.35)%,lgHBsAg(kU/L):3.72(3.29,3.92)比2.97(2.49,3.78),MELD评分:24.27(19.71,27.40)比21.88(18.83,24.38),均P<0.05],而白蛋白(ALB)、总胆固醇(CHO)、凝血酶原活动度(PTA)和甲胎蛋白(AFP)低于生存组[ALB(g/L):29.80(27.05,31.05)比30.80(28.00,33.90),CHO(mmol/L):1.98(1.50,2.38)比2.49(2.05,3.01),PTA:(30.37±7.09)%比(32.94±6.03)%,AFP(μg/L):21.54(9.28,51.54)比66.16(24.50,152.80),均P<0.05]。Logistic回归分析显示,NEUT%、HBsAg和AFP是HBV-ACLF患者短期预后的独立危险因素[比值比(OR)分别为77.843、1.439、0.995,均P<0.05]。根据回归分析结果,建立了NHA-ACLF模型(NEUT%+HBsAg+AFP)。公式为logit(NHA-ACLF)=-5.441+5.688×NEUT%+0.430×lgHBsAg-0.005×AFP。NHA-ACLF模型预测HBV-ACLF患者的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.790,优于NEUT%(AUC=0.696)、lgHBsAg(AUC=0.670)、AFP(AUC=0.703)和MELD评分(AUC=0.640)。当NHA-ACLF模型评分的截断值为0.459时,敏感度为73.7%,特异度为79.1%。

结论

NEUT%、HBsAg和AFP是HBV-ACLF患者短期预后的独立预测指标。与MELD评分相比,风险评估模型NHA-ACLF在预测HBV-ACLF患者短期预后方面具有更大价值。

相似文献

1
[Value of a new predictive model in evaluating short-term prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus related acute-on-chronic liver failure].[一种新的预测模型在评估乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Aug;32(8):988-993. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200102-00075.
2
[Study on the application value of MELD-Na, CLIF-C OFs, COSSH-ACLFs and NLR scoring systems in patients with hepatitis B virus related acute-on-chronic liver failure].[MELD-Na、CLIF-C OFs、COSSH-ACLFs及NLR评分系统在乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者中的应用价值研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Dec;32(12):1496-1501. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200720-00536.
3
[The therapeutic value of alpha-fetoprotein and cholinesterase in patients with hepatitis B virus related acute onset chronic liver failure].[甲胎蛋白和胆碱酯酶在乙型肝炎病毒相关性慢加急性肝衰竭患者中的治疗价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2016 Mar;28(3):257-61.
4
[Model for end-stage liver disease combined with arterial blood lactate to assess the prognosis of hepatitis B virus-associated acute-on-chronic liver failure: a retrospective analysis of 97 cases].终末期肝病模型联合动脉血乳酸评估乙型肝炎病毒相关性慢加急性肝衰竭预后:97例回顾性分析
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 20;27(4):256-260. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2019.04.004.
5
Short-term prognostic factors for hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure.乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭的短期预后因素
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Aug 16;10(23):8186-8195. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i23.8186.
6
[Clinical significance of CTP combined with ABIC score in predicting the short-term prognosis of patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure].CTP联合ABIC评分对预测乙型肝炎病毒相关性慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后的临床意义
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 20;27(2):118-122. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2019.02.009.
7
Soluble mannose receptor as a predictor of prognosis of hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure.可溶性甘露糖受体作为乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭预后的预测因子。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Oct 7;25(37):5667-5675. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i37.5667.
8
[The value of the baseline MELD scores, MELD-Na scores and iMELD scores in short-term prognosis in hepatitis B virus related acute-on-chronic liver failure patients].[基线终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分、MELD-钠评分及iMELD评分对乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后的价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Aug;26(8):539-43. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.08.003.
9
[Assessment of the predictive value of the model for end-stage liver disease scoring system combined with the indocyanine green clearance test for short-term prognosis of acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure].[终末期肝病评分系统联合吲哚菁绿清除试验模型对慢性乙型肝炎急性肝衰竭短期预后的预测价值评估]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2014 Mar;22(3):190-4. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2014.03.009.
10
[Analysis of prognosis-related factors in patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure].[乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者预后相关因素分析]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2021 Oct 20;29(10):983-986. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20200630-00354.