Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Cardiology Department, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep 14;13(17):1999-2009. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.05.011.
The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome of baseline massive or torrential tricuspid regurgitation (TR) after transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI).
The use of TTVI to treat symptomatic severe TR has been increasing rapidly, but little is known regarding the impact of massive or torrential TR beyond severe TR.
The study population comprised 333 patients with significant symptomatic TR from the TriValve Registry who underwent TTVI. Mid-term outcomes after TTVI were assessed according to the presence of massive or torrential TR, defined as vena contracta width ≥14 mm. Procedural success was defined as patient survival after successful device implantation and delivery system retrieval, with residual TR ≤2+. The primary endpoint comprised survival rate and freedom from rehospitalization for heart failure, survival rate, and rehospitalization at 1 year.
Baseline massive or torrential TR and severe TR were observed in 154 patients (46.2%) and 179 patients (53.8%), respectively. Patients with massive or torrential TR had a higher prevalence of ascites than those with severe TR (27.3% vs. 20.4%, respectively; p = 0.15) and demonstrated a similar procedural success rate (83.2% vs. 77.3%, respectively; p = 0.21). The incidence of peri-procedural adverse events was low, with no significant between-group differences. Freedom from the composite endpoint was significantly lower in patients with massive or torrential TR than in those with severe TR, which was significantly associated with an increased risk for 1-year death of any cause or rehospitalization for heart failure (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.91; 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 3.34; p = 0.022). Freedom from the composite endpoint was significantly higher in patients with massive or torrential TR when procedural success was achieved (69.9% vs. 54.2%, p = 0.048).
Baseline massive or torrential TR is associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for heart failure 1 year after TTVI. Procedural success is related to better outcomes, even in the presence of baseline massive or torrential TR. (International Multisite Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapies Registry [TriValve]; NCT03416166).
本研究旨在评估经导管三尖瓣介入治疗(TTVI)后基线重度或大量三尖瓣反流(TR)的临床转归。
TTVI 治疗症状性严重 TR 的应用正在迅速增加,但对于重度 TR 以外的大量或 torrential TR 的影响知之甚少。
该研究人群包括来自 TriValve 注册登记处的 333 例有症状的严重 TR 患者,他们接受了 TTVI。根据存在重度或 torrential TR (定义为收缩期瓣口宽度≥14mm)评估 TTVI 后的中期结果。程序成功定义为成功植入器械和回收输送系统后患者存活,残余 TR≤2+。主要终点包括生存率和因心力衰竭而再住院的无事件生存率、生存率和 1 年时再住院率。
基线重度或 torrential TR 和重度 TR 分别在 154 例患者(46.2%)和 179 例患者(53.8%)中观察到。重度或 torrential TR 患者腹水发生率高于重度 TR 患者(分别为 27.3%和 20.4%;p=0.15),且手术成功率相似(分别为 83.2%和 77.3%;p=0.21)。围手术期不良事件发生率较低,组间无显著差异。重度或 torrential TR 患者的复合终点无事件生存率明显低于重度 TR 患者,这与 1 年任何原因死亡或心力衰竭再住院的风险增加显著相关(校正风险比:1.91;95%置信区间:1.10 至 3.34;p=0.022)。当达到程序成功时,重度或 torrential TR 患者的复合终点无事件生存率明显较高(69.9% vs. 54.2%,p=0.048)。
基线重度或 torrential TR 与 TTVI 后 1 年全因死亡率和心力衰竭再住院风险增加相关。即使存在基线重度或 torrential TR,程序成功也与更好的结局相关。(国际多中心经导管三尖瓣瓣膜治疗登记研究 [TriValve];NCT03416166)。