Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Physical Education, Graduate School of Education, Yongin University, Yongin-si, Gyeongki-do, Republic of Korea.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jun;29(6):1936-1943. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06266-0. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
To compare clinical and radiological outcomes and failure rates between anatomical and high femoral tunnels in remnant-preserving single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction.
63 patients who underwent remnant-preserving single-bundle PCL reconstruction between 2011 and 2018 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the femoral tunnel position: group A (33 patients with anatomical femoral tunnel) and group H (30 patients with high femoral tunnels). The femoral tunnel was positioned at the center (group A) or upper margin (group H) of the remnant anterolateral bundle. The position of the femoral tunnel was evaluated using the grid method on three-dimensional computed tomography. Clinical and radiological outcomes and failure rates were compared between the groups at the 2-year follow-up.
The position of the femoral tunnel was significantly high in group H than in group A (87.4% ± 4.2% versus 76.1% ± 3.7%, p < 0.001). Clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups in terms of the clinical scores (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective, Lysholm, and Tegner activity scores), range of motion, and posterior drawer test. Radiological outcomes also showed no intergroup differences in the side-to-side differences of posterior tibial translation and osteoarthritis progression. Side-to-side difference on the Telos stress radiograph was 5.2 ± 2.9 mm in group A and 5.2 ± 2.7 mm in group H (n.s.). There were four failures in group A (12.1%) and one in group H (3.3%). The differences between the groups were not statistically significant.
The clinical and radiological outcomes and failure rates of the high femoral tunnels were comparable with those of the anatomical femoral tunnels at the 2-year follow-up after remnant-preserving single-bundle PCL reconstruction. The findings of this study suggest that high femoral tunnels can be considered an alternative in remnant-preserving single-bundle PCL reconstruction.
III.
比较保留残端的单束后交叉韧带(PCL)重建中解剖学股骨隧道和高位股骨隧道的临床和影像学结果及失败率。
回顾性分析 2011 年至 2018 年间行保留残端的单束 PCL 重建且随访时间至少 2 年的 63 例患者。根据股骨隧道位置将患者分为两组:A 组(33 例患者采用解剖学股骨隧道)和 H 组(30 例患者采用高位股骨隧道)。股骨隧道位于前外侧束残端的中心(A 组)或上缘(H 组)。采用三维 CT 上的网格法评估股骨隧道的位置。在 2 年随访时比较两组的临床和影像学结果及失败率。
H 组股骨隧道的位置明显高于 A 组(87.4%±4.2%比 76.1%±3.7%,p<0.001)。两组患者的临床评分(国际膝关节文献委员会主观评分、Lysholm 评分和 Tegner 活动评分)、关节活动度和后抽屉试验无显著差异。影像学结果也显示,两组间胫骨后移的侧别差异和骨关节炎进展无差异。A 组 Telos 应力量表的侧别差异为 5.2±2.9mm,H 组为 5.2±2.7mm(n.s.)。A 组有 4 例(12.1%)失败,H 组有 1 例(3.3%)失败。两组间差异无统计学意义。
保留残端的单束 PCL 重建术后 2 年,高位股骨隧道的临床和影像学结果及失败率与解剖学股骨隧道相当。本研究结果表明,高位股骨隧道可作为保留残端的单束 PCL 重建的一种替代方法。
III 级。