Alcaraz Antonio, Rodríguez-Antolín Alfredo, Carballido-Rodríguez Joaquín, Castro-Díaz David, Esteban-Fuertes Manuel, Cózar-Olmo José M, Ficarra Vincenzo, Medina-López Rafael, Fernández-Gómez Jesús M, Angulo Javier C, Medina-Polo José, Brenes-Bermúdez Francisco J, Molero-García José M, Fernández-Pro-Ledesma Antonio, Manasanch José, The Qualiprost Study Group On Behalf Of
Urology Department, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Urology Department, Research Group in Men's Integral Health, Instituto de Investigación i+12, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 9;9(9):2909. doi: 10.3390/jcm9092909.
To investigate whether tamsulosin (TAM) and the hexanic extract of (HESr) are more effective in combination than as monotherapy in men with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). Subset analysis of data from a 6-month, multicenter observational study. Patients received either tamsulosin (0.4 mg/day) or HESr (320 mg/day) alone or in combination. Primary endpoints were change in symptoms and quality of life. Tolerability was also assessed. Seven hundred and nine patients were available for intention to treat (ITT) analysis, 263 treated with tamsulosin, 262 with HESr, and 184 with TAM + HESr. After 6 months, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) scores improved by a mean (standard deviation) of 7.2 (5.0) points in the TAM + HESr group compared to 5.7 (4.3) points with TAM alone and 5.4 (4.6) points with HESr ( < 0.001). Quality of life showed greatest improvement with combination therapy ( < 0.02). Adverse effects were reported by 1.9% of patients receiving HESr, 13.3% receiving TAM, and 12.0% receiving TAM + HESr ( < 0.001). In men with moderate/severe LUTS/BPH, combination treatment with TAM + HESr produced more effective symptom relief and greater improvement in quality of life than with either treatment alone, with acceptable tolerability.
研究坦索罗辛(TAM)与锯叶棕果实提取物软胶囊(HESr)联合使用治疗中度至重度良性前列腺增生相关下尿路症状(LUTS/BPH)男性患者时,是否比单一用药更有效。对一项为期6个月的多中心观察性研究的数据进行亚组分析。患者分别接受坦索罗辛(0.4毫克/天)或锯叶棕果实提取物软胶囊(320毫克/天)单一治疗或联合治疗。主要终点为症状和生活质量的变化。同时评估耐受性。709例患者可进行意向性治疗(ITT)分析,其中263例接受坦索罗辛治疗,262例接受锯叶棕果实提取物软胶囊治疗,184例接受坦索罗辛+锯叶棕果实提取物软胶囊联合治疗。6个月后,坦索罗辛+锯叶棕果实提取物软胶囊组国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)平均(标准差)改善7.2(5.0)分(坦索罗辛单一治疗组为5.7(4.3)分,锯叶棕果实提取物软胶囊单一治疗组为5.4(4.6)分,P<0.001)。联合治疗组生活质量改善最为显著(P<0.02)。接受锯叶棕果实提取物软胶囊治疗的患者不良反应报告率为1.9%,接受坦索罗辛治疗的为13.3%,接受坦索罗辛+锯叶棕果实提取物软胶囊联合治疗的为12.0%(P<0.001)。对于中度/重度LUTS/BPH男性患者,坦索罗辛+锯叶棕果实提取物软胶囊联合治疗比单一治疗能更有效地缓解症状、改善生活质量,且耐受性良好。