Clinical Research Center of Shaanxi Province for Dental and Maxillofacial Diseases, College of Stomatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710004, PR China.
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi Wu Road No.98, Xi'an, 710004, PR China.
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 11;20(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02230-1.
Layering techniques for direct composite resin restorations might be complicated for inexperienced learners, as a number of materials and instruments are required at each step. The present study aimed to compare and assess the teaching effect of step-by-step and all-in-one teaching methods in layering techniques for direct composite resin restorations among undergraduate dental students.
A total of 68 junior dental students participated in this study, which was a prospective and single-blind trial. The students were randomly divided into a step-by-step group (experimental group, n = 34) and all-in-one group (control group, n = 34). The same teacher taught the two groups, ensuring a comparable teaching effect. The final score of each student was an average of scores by two experts who were blinded to the grouping. The scoring system was consisted by five parts. Each part was assigned scores of 3.0, 1.5, or 0. The total maximum score was 15 and minimum was 0. The total time taken by each group was also calculated.
The values of the quality of tooth restorations evaluated by experts for step-by-step and all-in-one groups were 11.29 ± 2.13 from 15 and 9.00 ± 2.71 from 15 (t = 3.88, P < 0.001), respectively. In addition, the time spent by the experimental group was significantly lesser than that spent by the control group, which was 122.47 ± 2.82 and 137.18 ± 6.75 min, respectively (t = 11.72, p < 0.001).
With regard to the layering techniques for direct composite resin restorations, the outcomes were better in the step-by-step group than in the all-in-one group.
对于缺乏经验的学习者来说,直接复合树脂修复的分层技术可能很复杂,因为每个步骤都需要多种材料和器械。本研究旨在比较和评估分层技术中分步教学法和一体式教学法在本科牙科学生中的教学效果。
共有 68 名初级牙科学生参与了这项前瞻性、单盲试验。学生被随机分为分步组(实验组,n=34)和一体式组(对照组,n=34)。由同一位教师授课,以确保可比的教学效果。每位学生的最终分数是两位专家的平均分,两位专家对分组情况不知情。评分系统由五个部分组成。每个部分的分数为 3.0、1.5 或 0。总分为 15 分,最低分为 0。同时还计算了每个组的总用时。
专家评估的分步组和一体式组的牙齿修复质量评分分别为 15 分中的 11.29±2.13 分和 15 分中的 9.00±2.71 分(t=3.88,P<0.001)。此外,实验组的用时明显少于对照组,分别为 122.47±2.82 分钟和 137.18±6.75 分钟(t=11.72,p<0.001)。
在直接复合树脂修复的分层技术方面,分步组的效果优于一体式组。