Division of Infectious Diseases, CUB-Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, CUB-Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Hôpital Rangueil, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, INSERM U10403, Toulouse, France.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Mar;27(3):398-405. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.005. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
Many transplant physicians screen for and treat asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) during post-kidney-transplant surveillance. We investigated whether antibiotics are effective in reducing the occurrence of symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) in kidney transplant recipients with ASB.
We performed this multicentre, randomized, open-label trial in kidney transplant recipients who had ASB and were ≥2 months post-transplantation. We randomly assigned participants to receive antibiotics or no therapy. The primary outcome was the incidence of symptomatic UTI over the subsequent 12 months.
One hundred and ninety-nine kidney transplant recipients with ASB were randomly assigned to antibiotics (100 participants) or no therapy (99 participants). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of symptomatic UTI between the antibiotic and no-therapy groups (27%, 27/100 versus 31%, 31/99; univariate Cox model: hazard ratio 0.83, 95%CI: 0.50-1.40; log-rank test: p 0.49). Over the 1-year study period, antibiotic use was five times higher in the antibiotic group than in the no-therapy group (30 antibiotic days/participant, interquartile range 20-41, versus 6, interquartile range 0-15, p < 0.001). Overall, 155/199 participants (78%) had at least one further episode of bacteriuria during the follow-up. Compared with the participant's baseline episode of ASB, the second episode of bacteriuria was more frequently caused by bacteria resistant to clinically relevant antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, cotrimoxazole, third-generation cephalosporin) in the antibiotic group than in the no-therapy group (18%, 13/72 versus 4%, 3/83, p 0.003).
Applying a screen-and-treat strategy for ASB does not reduce the occurrence of symptomatic UTI in kidney transplant recipients who are more than 2 months post-transplantation. Furthermore, this strategy increases antibiotic use and promotes the emergence of resistant organisms.
许多移植医生在肾移植后监测期间筛查和治疗无症状菌尿(ASB)。我们研究了在患有 ASB 的肾移植受者中,抗生素是否能有效降低症状性尿路感染(UTI)的发生。
我们在≥2 个月肾移植后患有 ASB 的肾移植受者中进行了这项多中心、随机、开放标签试验。我们将参与者随机分配接受抗生素或无治疗。主要结局是在接下来的 12 个月内症状性 UTI 的发生。
199 例患有 ASB 的肾移植受者被随机分配接受抗生素(100 例)或无治疗(99 例)。抗生素组和无治疗组症状性 UTI 的发生率无显著差异(27%,27/100 与 31%,31/99;单变量 Cox 模型:风险比 0.83,95%CI:0.50-1.40;对数秩检验:p=0.49)。在 1 年的研究期间,抗生素组的抗生素使用量是无治疗组的五倍(30 个抗生素天/参与者,四分位距 20-41,与 6,四分位距 0-15,p<0.001)。总体而言,199 例参与者中有 155 例(78%)在随访期间至少有一次进一步的菌尿发作。与基线 ASB 相比,抗生素组的第二次菌尿发作更常由对临床相关抗生素(环丙沙星、复方磺胺甲噁唑、第三代头孢菌素)耐药的细菌引起,而无治疗组则较少见(18%,13/72 与 4%,3/83,p=0.003)。
在移植后超过 2 个月的肾移植受者中,应用筛查和治疗无症状菌尿的策略并不能降低症状性 UTI 的发生。此外,这种策略增加了抗生素的使用,并促进了耐药菌的出现。