Effect of automated identification of antimicrobial stewardship opportunities for suspected urinary tract infections.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine whether automated identification of antibiotic targeting suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) shortened the time to antimicrobial stewardship (AS) intervention.

DESIGN

Retrospective before-and-after study.

SETTING

Tertiary and quaternary care academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Emergency department (ED) or admitted adult patients meeting best practice alert (BPA) criteria during pre- and post-BPA periods.

METHODS

We developed a BPA to alert AS pharmacists of potential ASB triggered by the following criteria: ED or admitted status, antibiotic order with genitourinary indication, and a preceding urinalysis with ≤ 10 WBC/hpf. We evaluated the median time from antibiotic order to AS intervention and overall percent of UTI-related interventions among patients in pre-BPA (01/2020-12/2020) and post-BPA (04/15/2021-04/30/2022) periods.

RESULTS

774 antibiotic orders met inclusion criteria: 355 in the pre- and 419 in the post-BPA group. 43 (35 UTI-related) pre-BPA and 117 (94 UTI-related) post-BPA interventions were documented. The median time to intervention was 28 hours (IQR 18-65) in the pre-BPA group compared to 16 hours (IQR 2-34) in the post-BPA group ( < 0.01). Despite absent pyuria, there were six cases with gram-negative bacteremia presumably from a urinary source.

CONCLUSIONS

Automated identification of antibiotics targeting UTI without pyuria on urinalysis reduced the time to stewardship intervention and increased the rate of UTI-specific interventions. Clinical decision support aided in the efficiency of AS review and syndrome-targeted impact, but cases still required AS clinical review.