Suppr超能文献

鼻中隔黏膜瓣掀起术对术后嗅觉和鼻-鼻窦生活质量的影响:一项前瞻性双盲随机对照试验。

The Effect of Nasoseptal Flap Elevation on Post-Operative Olfaction and Sinonasal Quality of Life: A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2021 May;35(3):353-360. doi: 10.1177/1945892420957505. Epub 2020 Sep 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of nasoseptal flaps (NSF) for defect reconstruction in endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) to cranial base pathology has markedly reduced rates of cerebrospinal fluid leak. However, the effect of NSF use on post-operative olfaction remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of NSF use during EEA on binarial and uninarial olfaction, and sinonasal quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

This was a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing EEA for sellar pathology were recruited from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from December 2014 to May 2017. Subjects were randomized pre-operatively to a side of NSF harvest. Olfaction and QOL were assessed pre-operatively and 6 to 12 months post-operatively using the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test, "Sniffin' Sticks," and Sinonasal Outcomes Test 22. The side of dominant uninarial olfaction was determined using "Sniffin' Sticks."

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled. Sixteen underwent EEA without NSF (control group) and 15 with NSF. A dominant side of olfaction was identified in 14 patients with NSF; 8 patients were randomized to NSF harvest on the dominant side and the remaining 6 on the non-dominant side. NSF elevation resulted in a 4% decrease in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test scores, but was not statistically significant compared to controls. Similarly, NSF elevation on the side of dominant olfaction resulted in a 6% decrease, but was not statistically significant when compared to the non-dominant elevation group. Change in rhinologic QOL as determined by the Sinonasal Outcomes Test 22 was not significantly different between any of the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of NSF during EEA for sellar pathology does not have a significant effect on olfaction or rhinologic QOL. The presence of a dominant side of olfaction is not a primary consideration when deciding the side of NSF harvest.

摘要

背景

在经鼻内镜颅底手术(EEA)中使用鼻中隔鼻瓣(NSF)重建缺陷可显著降低脑脊液漏的发生率。然而,NSF 的使用对术后嗅觉的影响尚不清楚。

目的

评估 NSF 在 EEA 中使用对二项式和单项式嗅觉以及鼻-鼻窦生活质量(QOL)的影响。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验。2014 年 12 月至 2017 年 5 月,匹兹堡大学医学中心招募了因鞍区病变而接受 EEA 的患者。患者在术前被随机分配到 NSF 采集的一侧。使用宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试、“Sniffin' Sticks”和鼻-鼻窦结局测试 22 在术前和术后 6 至 12 个月评估嗅觉和 QOL。使用“Sniffin' Sticks”确定单项式嗅觉的优势侧。

结果

共纳入 31 例患者。16 例患者未行 NSF 行 EEA(对照组),15 例行 NSF 行 EEA。14 例行 NSF 的患者确定了嗅觉优势侧;8 例患者被随机分配到 NSF 优势侧采集,其余 6 例患者分配到非优势侧采集。NSF 抬高导致宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试评分降低 4%,但与对照组相比无统计学意义。同样,与非优势侧抬高组相比,在优势侧嗅觉抬高导致嗅觉降低 6%,但无统计学意义。通过鼻-鼻窦结局测试 22 确定的鼻科学 QOL 变化在任何组之间均无显著差异。

结论

在因鞍区病变而行 EEA 中使用 NSF 对嗅觉或鼻科学 QOL 没有显著影响。存在嗅觉优势侧并不是决定 NSF 采集侧的主要考虑因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验