Suppr超能文献

DyAdd项目:阅读障碍的非语言理论预测智力。

Project DyAdd: Non-linguistic Theories of Dyslexia Predict Intelligence.

作者信息

Laasonen Marja, Lahti-Nuuttila Pekka, Leppämäki Sami, Tani Pekka, Wikgren Jan, Harno Hanna, Oksanen-Hennah Henna, Pothos Emmanuel, Cleeremans Axel, Dye Matthew W G, Cousineau Denis, Hokkanen Laura

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Phoniatrics - Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Aug 14;14:316. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00316. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Two themes have puzzled the research on developmental and learning disorders for decades. First, some of the risk and protective factors behind developmental challenges are suggested to be shared and some are suggested to be specific for a given condition. Second, language-based learning difficulties like dyslexia are suggested to result from or correlate with non-linguistic aspects of information processing as well. In the current study, we investigated how adults with developmental dyslexia or ADHD as well as healthy controls cluster across various dimensions designed to tap the prominent non-linguistic theories of dyslexia. Participants were 18-55-year-old adults with dyslexia ( = 36), ADHD ( = 22), and controls ( = 35). Non-linguistic theories investigated with experimental designs included temporal processing impairment, abnormal cerebellar functioning, procedural learning difficulties, as well as visual processing and attention deficits. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to investigate the emerging groups and patterns of results across these experimental designs. LPA suggested three groups: (1) a large group with average performance in the experimental designs, (2) participants predominantly from the clinical groups but with enhanced conditioning learning, and (3) participants predominantly from the dyslexia group with temporal processing as well as visual processing and attention deficits. Despite the presence of these distinct patterns, participants did not cluster very well based on their original status, nor did the LPA groups differ in their dyslexia or ADHD-related neuropsychological profiles. Remarkably, the LPA groups did differ in their intelligence. These results highlight the continuous and overlapping nature of the observed difficulties and support the multiple deficit model of developmental disorders, which suggests shared risk factors for developmental challenges. It also appears that some of the risk factors suggested by the prominent non-linguistic theories of dyslexia relate to the general level of functioning in tests of intelligence.

摘要

几十年来,有两个主题一直困扰着发育障碍和学习障碍的研究。首先,有人认为发育挑战背后的一些风险因素和保护因素是共有的,而另一些则是特定于某一特定情况的。其次,像诵读困难这样基于语言的学习困难也被认为是由信息处理的非语言方面导致的,或者与之相关。在本研究中,我们调查了患有发育性诵读困难或注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的成年人以及健康对照组在旨在挖掘诵读困难突出非语言理论的各个维度上是如何聚类的。参与者为18至55岁的成年人,其中诵读困难患者36人,ADHD患者22人,对照组35人。通过实验设计研究的非语言理论包括时间处理障碍、小脑功能异常、程序学习困难以及视觉处理和注意力缺陷。潜在剖面分析(LPA)用于研究这些实验设计中出现的分组和结果模式。LPA显示出三组:(1)在实验设计中表现中等的一大组;(2)主要来自临床组但条件学习能力增强的参与者;(3)主要来自诵读困难组且存在时间处理以及视觉处理和注意力缺陷的参与者。尽管存在这些不同的模式,但参与者并未根据其原始状态很好地聚类,LPA分组在诵读困难或ADHD相关的神经心理学特征方面也没有差异。值得注意的是,LPA分组在智力方面存在差异。这些结果突出了所观察到的困难的连续性和重叠性,并支持发育障碍的多重缺陷模型,该模型表明发育挑战存在共同的风险因素。此外,诵读困难突出非语言理论所提出的一些风险因素似乎与智力测试中的总体功能水平有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e46/7456923/37f773b1822b/fnhum-14-00316-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验