Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Finland.
J Learn Disabil. 2009 Nov-Dec;42(6):511-27. doi: 10.1177/0022219409345013. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
The project Adult Dyslexia and Attention Deficit Disorder in Finland (Project DyAdd) compares adults (n = 119, 18-55 years) with dyslexia, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), dyslexia together with ADHD (comorbid), and healthy controls with neuropsychological, psychophysical, and biological methods. The focus of this article is on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-III). The clinical groups performed well compared to the norms, and they did not differ from each other. However, compared to the controls, all of them were slightly poorer in their Full IQ, and of the factors, processing speed was relatively difficult for all of them. In addition to the group comparisons, a cluster analysis based on subtest scores was conducted over the clinical groups. It did not suggest a solution that would differentiate between the clinical groups. Instead, four clusters emerged: above average, average, poor perceptual organization, and poor working memory. Thus, differentiating between these clinical groups with the WAIS-III was not possible. However, all of them shared a relative difficulty in processing speed, and group-independent clusters with perceptual or memory difficulties emerged.
芬兰成人诵读困难和注意缺陷多动障碍项目(Project DyAdd)比较了患有诵读困难、注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)、诵读困难伴 ADHD(共病)的成年人(n=119,18-55 岁)和健康对照组,使用神经心理学、心理物理学和生物学方法。本文的重点是韦氏成人智力量表第三版(WAIS-III)。与常模相比,临床组的表现良好,彼此之间没有差异。然而,与对照组相比,他们的全智商都略低,其中所有组的加工速度都相对困难。除了组间比较外,还对临床组进行了基于子测验分数的聚类分析。它没有提出一个能够区分临床组的解决方案。相反,出现了四个聚类:高于平均水平、平均水平、较差的知觉组织和较差的工作记忆。因此,用 WAIS-III 区分这些临床组是不可能的。然而,它们都有相对困难的加工速度,并且出现了与知觉或记忆困难相关的组间独立聚类。