Mental Health Department - Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Basurto University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of the Basque Country - UPV/EHU, Biscay, Spain.
Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 May;62(5):657-673. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13322. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
The clinical high-risk state for psychosis (CHR-P) paradigm has facilitated the implementation of psychosis prevention into clinical practice; however, advancements in adolescent CHR-P populations are less established.
We performed a PRISMA/MOOSE-compliant systematic review of the Web of Science database, from inception until 7 October 2019, to identify original studies conducted in CHR-P children and adolescents (mean age <18 years). Findings were systematically appraised around core themes: detection, prognosis and intervention. We performed meta-analyses (employing Q statistics and I test) regarding the proportion of CHR-P subgroups, the prevalence of baseline comorbid mental disorders, the risk of psychosis onset and the type of interventions received at baseline. Quality assessment and publication bias were also analysed.
Eighty-seven articles were included (n = 4,667 CHR-P individuals). Quality of studies ranged from 3.5 to 8 (median 5.5) on a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Detection: Individuals were aged 15.6 ± 1.2 years (51.5% males), mostly (83%) presenting with attenuated positive psychotic symptoms. CHR-P psychometric accuracy improved when caregivers served as additional informants. Comorbid mood (46.4%) and anxiety (31.4%) disorders were highly prevalent. Functioning and cognition were impaired. Neurobiological studies were inconclusive.
Risk for psychosis was 10.4% (95%CI: 5.8%-18.1%) at 6 months, 20% (95%CI: 15%-26%) at 12 months, 23% (95%CI: 18%-29%) at 24 months and 23.3% (95%CI: 17.3%-30.7%) at ≥36 months.
There was not enough evidence to recommend one specific treatment (including cognitive behavioural therapy) over the others (including control conditions) to prevent the transition to psychosis in this population. Randomised controlled trials suggested that family interventions, cognitive remediation and fish oil supplementation may improve cognition, symptoms and functioning. At baseline, 30% of CHR-P adolescents were prescribed antipsychotics and 60% received psychotherapy.
It is possible to detect and formulate a group-level prognosis in adolescents at risk for psychosis. Future interventional research is required.
精神病高危状态(CHR-P)范式促进了精神病预防在临床实践中的实施;然而,青少年 CHR-P 人群的进展情况则不太确定。
我们对 Web of Science 数据库进行了 PRISMA/MOOSE 一致性系统评价,从创建到 2019 年 10 月 7 日,以确定在 CHR-P 儿童和青少年(平均年龄<18 岁)中进行的原始研究。结果围绕核心主题进行了系统评估:检测、预后和干预。我们针对 CHR-P 亚组的比例、基线合并精神障碍的患病率、精神病发病风险和基线时接受的干预类型进行了荟萃分析(采用 Q 统计量和 I 检验)。还分析了质量评估和发表偏倚。
共纳入 87 篇文章(n=4667 名 CHR-P 个体)。研究质量根据改良的 Newcastle-Ottawa 量表评分为 3.5 至 8 分(中位数为 5.5 分)。检测:参与者的年龄为 15.6±1.2 岁(51.5%为男性),主要(83%)表现为轻度阳性精神病症状。当照顾者作为额外的信息来源时,CHR-P 的心理测量准确性提高。合并心境(46.4%)和焦虑(31.4%)障碍的患病率很高。功能和认知受损。神经生物学研究尚无定论。
6 个月时精神病风险为 10.4%(95%CI:5.8%-18.1%),12 个月时为 20%(95%CI:15%-26%),24 个月时为 23%(95%CI:18%-29%),≥36 个月时为 23.3%(95%CI:17.3%-30.7%)。
没有足够的证据推荐一种特定的治疗方法(包括认知行为疗法)优于其他方法(包括对照条件)来预防该人群向精神病的转变。随机对照试验表明,家庭干预、认知矫正和鱼油补充剂可能改善认知、症状和功能。在基线时,30%的 CHR-P 青少年被开了抗精神病药,60%的人接受了心理治疗。
可以在有精神病风险的青少年中进行检测和制定群体水平的预后。需要进行未来的干预研究。