• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症高危个体共病精神障碍的荟萃分析患病率:跨诊断评估的情况。

Meta-analytic prevalence of comorbid mental disorders in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis: the case for transdiagnostic assessment.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

On Track, First Episode Psychosis Program, Department of Mental Health, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;28(6):2291-2300. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02029-8. Epub 2023 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1038/s41380-023-02029-8
PMID:37296309
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10611568/
Abstract

Comorbid mental disorders in subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) may impact preventive care. We conducted a PRISMA/MOOSE-compliant systematic meta-analysis, searching PubMed/PsycInfo up to June 21st, 2021 for observational studies/randomized controlled trials reporting on comorbid DSM/ICD-mental disorders in CHR-P subjects ( protocol ). The primary and secondary outcomes were baseline and follow-up prevalence of comorbid mental disorders. We also explored the association of comorbid mental disorders compared with CHR-P versus psychotic/non-psychotic control groups, their impact on baseline functioning and transition to psychosis. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses, meta-regression, and assessed heterogeneity/publication bias/quality (Newcastle Ottawa Scale, NOS). We included 312 studies (largest meta-analyzed sample = 7834, any anxiety disorder, mean age = 19.98 (3.40), females = 43.88%, overall NOS > 6 in 77.6% of studies). The prevalence was 0.78 (95% CI = 0.73-0.82, k = 29) for any comorbid non-psychotic mental disorder, 0.60 (95% CI = 0.36-0.84, k = 3) for anxiety/mood disorders, 0.44 (95% CI = 0.39-0.49, k = 48) for any mood disorders, 0.38 (95% CI = 0.33-0.42, k = 50) for any depressive disorder/episode, 0.34 (95% CI = 0.30-0.38, k = 69) for any anxiety disorder, 0.30 (95% CI 0.25-0.35, k = 35) for major depressive disorders, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.08-0.51, k = 3) for any trauma-related disorder, 0.23 (95% CI = 0.17-0.28, k = 24) for any personality disorder, and <0.23 in other mental disorders (I > 50% in 71.01% estimates). The prevalence of any comorbid mental disorder decreased over time (0.51, 95% CI = 0.25-0.77 over 96 months), except any substance use which increased (0.19, 95% CI = 0.00-0.39, k = 2, >96 months). Compared with controls, the CHR-P status was associated with a higher prevalence of anxiety, schizotypal personality, panic, and alcohol use disorders (OR from 2.90 to 1.54 versus without psychosis), a higher prevalence of anxiety/mood disorders (OR = 9.30 to 2.02) and lower prevalence of any substance use disorder (OR = 0.41, versus psychosis). Higher baseline prevalence of alcohol use disorder/schizotypal personality disorder was negatively associated with baseline functioning (beta from -0.40 to -0.15), while dysthymic disorder/generalized anxiety disorder with higher functioning (beta 0.59 to 1.49). Higher baseline prevalence of any mood disorder/generalized anxiety disorder/agoraphobia (beta from -2.39 to -0.27) was negatively associated with transition to psychosis. In conclusion, over three-quarters of CHR-P subjects have comorbid mental disorders, which modulate baseline functionig and transition to psychosis. Transdiagnostic mental health assessment should be warranted in subjects at CHR-P.

摘要

患有精神病高危(CHR-P)的患者可能存在合并精神障碍,这可能会影响预防保健。我们进行了一项符合 PRISMA/MOOSE 标准的系统荟萃分析,截至 2021 年 6 月 21 日,通过 PubMed/PsycInfo 搜索了报告 CHR-P 患者中合并 DSM/ICD 精神障碍的观察性研究/随机对照试验(方案)。主要和次要结局是合并精神障碍的基线和随访患病率。我们还探讨了与 CHR-P 相比,与精神病/非精神病对照组相比,合并精神障碍的相关性,及其对基线功能和向精神病转化的影响。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析、荟萃回归,并评估了异质性/发表偏倚/质量(纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表,NOS)。我们纳入了 312 项研究(最大的荟萃分析样本量为 7834 例,任何焦虑障碍,平均年龄为 19.98(3.40),女性为 43.88%,总体 NOS 超过 77.6%的研究为 6)。任何非精神病性合并精神障碍的患病率为 0.78(95%CI=0.73-0.82,k=29),焦虑/心境障碍为 0.60(95%CI=0.36-0.84,k=3),任何心境障碍为 0.44(95%CI=0.39-0.49,k=48),任何抑郁障碍/发作为 0.38(95%CI=0.33-0.42,k=50),任何焦虑障碍为 0.34(95%CI=0.30-0.38,k=69),重性抑郁障碍为 0.30(95%CI=0.25-0.35,k=35),任何创伤相关障碍为 0.29(95%CI=0.08-0.51,k=3),任何人格障碍为 0.23(95%CI=0.17-0.28,k=24),其他精神障碍<0.23(71.01%的估计值中 I>50%)。任何合并精神障碍的患病率随时间呈下降趋势(0.51,95%CI=0.25-0.77,超过 96 个月),除任何物质使用障碍增加(0.19,95%CI=0.00-0.39,k=2,超过 96 个月)外。与对照组相比,CHR-P 状态与焦虑、分裂型人格、惊恐和酒精使用障碍的患病率较高(OR 从 2.90 到 1.54,与无精神病相比)、焦虑/心境障碍的患病率较高(OR=9.30 到 2.02)和任何物质使用障碍的患病率较低(OR=0.41,与精神病相比)。较高的基线酒精使用障碍/分裂型人格障碍患病率与基线功能呈负相关(β值从-0.40 到-0.15),而心境恶劣障碍/广泛性焦虑障碍与较高的功能呈正相关(β值 0.59 到 1.49)。较高的基线任何心境障碍/广泛性焦虑障碍/惊恐障碍患病率与向精神病转化呈负相关(β值从-2.39 到-0.27)。总之,超过四分之三的 CHR-P 患者患有合并精神障碍,这些障碍会影响基线功能和向精神病转化。CHR-P 患者应进行跨诊断心理健康评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d9/10611568/449ca5f5ad5e/41380_2023_2029_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d9/10611568/f8477c1183eb/41380_2023_2029_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d9/10611568/449ca5f5ad5e/41380_2023_2029_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d9/10611568/f8477c1183eb/41380_2023_2029_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4d9/10611568/449ca5f5ad5e/41380_2023_2029_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Meta-analytic prevalence of comorbid mental disorders in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis: the case for transdiagnostic assessment.精神分裂症高危个体共病精神障碍的荟萃分析患病率:跨诊断评估的情况。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;28(6):2291-2300. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02029-8. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
2
Clinical outcomes in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis who do not transition to psychosis: a meta-analysis.未发展为精神病的临床精神病高危个体的临床结局:meta 分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2022 Jan 19;31:e9. doi: 10.1017/S2045796021000639.
3
Annual Research Review: Prevention of psychosis in adolescents - systematic review and meta-analysis of advances in detection, prognosis and intervention.年度研究综述:青少年精神病预防 - 检测、预后和干预进展的系统综述和荟萃分析。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021 May;62(5):657-673. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13322. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
4
Comorbid depressive and anxiety disorders in 509 individuals with an at-risk mental state: impact on psychopathology and transition to psychosis.509名处于精神状态高危的个体中并存的抑郁和焦虑障碍:对精神病理学及向精神病转变的影响
Schizophr Bull. 2014 Jan;40(1):120-31. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs136. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
5
Probability of Transition to Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk: An Updated Meta-analysis.临床高风险个体向精神病转化的概率:一项更新的荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 1;78(9):970-978. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0830.
6
Transition to psychosis in randomized clinical trials of individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis compared to observational cohorts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.临床高风险精神病患者随机临床试验与观察队列相比向精神病转变:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 28;64(1):e51. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.2222.
7
Prevalence of tobacco smoking in people at clinical high-risk for psychosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.临床精神病高危人群中吸烟的流行情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Schizophr Res. 2023 Apr;254:109-115. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
8
Prevention of Psychosis: Advances in Detection, Prognosis, and Intervention.预防精神病学:检测、预后和干预的新进展。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 1;77(7):755-765. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4779.
9
Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.给编辑的信:《ICD-11 与 DSM-5 心境障碍分类的趋同与分歧》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899.
10
First-rank symptoms and premorbid adjustment in young individuals at increased risk of developing psychosis.处于精神病发病风险增加的年轻人的一级症状和病前适应情况。
Psychopathology. 2015;48(2):120-6. doi: 10.1159/000369859.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of childhood trauma and parental socialization on at-risk mental state in non-clinical adolescents.童年创伤和父母社会化对非临床青少年高危心理状态的影响。
World J Psychiatry. 2025 Sep 19;15(9):108465. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i9.108465.
2
Psychiatric Antecedents in Adolescents at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Insights from the "Parma At-Risk Mental States" Follow-up Program.临床高危青少年精神病的精神科前驱因素:来自“帕尔马高危精神状态”随访项目的见解
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2025 Aug 30. doi: 10.1007/s10802-025-01368-0.
3
Prediction of antipsychotic medication inception in antipsychotic-naive youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic accuracy and clinical utility of psychometric instruments for individuals at clinical high-risk of psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.精神病理学临床高危人群心理测量工具的预后准确性和临床实用性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;27(9):3670-3678. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01611-w. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
2
Global population attributable fraction of potentially modifiable risk factors for mental disorders: a meta-umbrella systematic review.全球精神障碍潜在可调节风险因素的人群归因分数:一项荟萃性 umbrella 系统评价。
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Aug;27(8):3510-3519. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01586-8. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
3
在临床高危的初治青年中预测抗精神病药物的起始使用情况,这些青年有患精神病的风险。
Psychol Med. 2025 Aug 22;55:e241. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725101372.
4
Dopamine and Mood in Psychotic Disorders: An 18F-DOPA PET Study.精神障碍中的多巴胺与情绪:一项18F - DOPA正电子发射断层扫描研究
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.1811.
5
Co-occurring eating disorder and psychosis: a lived experience case exploration with examples and suggestions for personalized integrated treatment approach.共病饮食失调与精神病:一个基于亲身经历的案例探索,附实例及个性化综合治疗方法建议
J Eat Disord. 2025 Aug 1;13(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01270-6.
6
Childhood trauma and recent stressors in predicting subclinical psychotic symptoms among Chinese university students in southwest China: a machine learning analysis within a gender-specific framework.童年创伤与近期应激源对中国西南地区大学生亚临床精神病性症状的预测:基于特定性别框架的机器学习分析
BMJ Ment Health. 2025 Jul 31;28(1):e301761. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-301761.
7
AI-based prediction of depression symptomatology in first-episode psychosis patients: insights from the EUFEST and RAISE-ETP clinical trials.基于人工智能对首发精神病患者抑郁症状的预测:来自EUFEST和RAISE - ETP临床试验的见解
Psychol Med. 2025 Jul 30;55:e221. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725100950.
8
New Developments in Psychiatric Classification: A Transdiagnostic Approach.精神疾病分类的新进展:一种跨诊断方法。
Cureus. 2025 May 21;17(5):e84580. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84580. eCollection 2025 May.
9
Screening the Community for Individuals at Clinical High Risk (CHR) for Psychosis.在社区中筛查临床高危(CHR)精神病个体。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;19(6):e70056. doi: 10.1111/eip.70056.
10
Implementing Learning Health System Principles to Advance the Evaluation and Treatment of Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis.实施学习型健康系统原则以推进精神病临床高危人群的评估与治疗。
medRxiv. 2025 May 11:2025.05.09.25327345. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.09.25327345.
Reliability and Validity of the Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Interview and Scale-Full Prospective in Its Turkish Translation.
双相前驱症状访谈及量表全前瞻性土耳其语翻译版的信度与效度
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2022 Apr;32(3):178-186. doi: 10.1089/cap.2021.0071. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
4
Public health primary prevention implemented by clinical high-risk services for psychosis.精神疾病临床高风险服务实施的公共卫生一级预防。
Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 28;12(1):43. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-01805-4.
5
Clinical outcomes in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis who do not transition to psychosis: a meta-analysis.未发展为精神病的临床精神病高危个体的临床结局:meta 分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2022 Jan 19;31:e9. doi: 10.1017/S2045796021000639.
6
Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.普通人群和临床样本中处于精神病临床高危状态个体的患病率:系统评价与荟萃分析
Brain Sci. 2021 Nov 20;11(11):1544. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111544.
7
Risk and protective factors for mental disorders beyond genetics: an evidence-based atlas.超越基因的精神障碍风险与保护因素:循证图谱
World Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;20(3):417-436. doi: 10.1002/wps.20894.
8
Impact of Comorbid Affective Disorders on Longitudinal Clinical Outcomes in Individuals at Ultra-high Risk for Psychosis.共病情感障碍对超高危精神病个体纵向临床结局的影响。
Schizophr Bull. 2022 Jan 21;48(1):100-110. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbab088.
9
Transition to psychosis in randomized clinical trials of individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis compared to observational cohorts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.临床高风险精神病患者随机临床试验与观察队列相比向精神病转变:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 28;64(1):e51. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.2222.
10
Probability of Transition to Psychosis in Individuals at Clinical High Risk: An Updated Meta-analysis.临床高风险个体向精神病转化的概率:一项更新的荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 1;78(9):970-978. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0830.