• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同剂量粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗儿童恶性肿瘤并发高危发热性中性粒细胞减少症的比较。

Comparison of Different Doses of Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor in the Treatment of High-risk Febrile Neutropenia in Children With Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Oncology/Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Cukurova, University, Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.

出版信息

J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2020 Nov;42(8):e738-e744. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001940.

DOI:10.1097/MPH.0000000000001940
PMID:32925403
Abstract

Febrile neutropenia (FEN) is a significant side effect after chemotherapy, and it is known that using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has positive effects on treatment results. In this study, the effects of different G-CSF doses (5 to 10 mcg/kg/day) on treatment results in patients with high-risk FEN were evaluated. A total of 124 high-risk FEN episodes of 62 patients were enrolled in the study between June 2017 and October 2018. The episodes were divided into 2 groups according to G-CSF treatment doses, they received from 5 to 10 mcg/kg/day. The clinical characteristics of the patients, the treatments they received, laboratory findings, microbiologic results, and cost analysis were recorded. No statistically significant difference was found between 2 groups in terms of the mean duration of recovery from neutropenia, duration of fever, total length of hospital stay, duration of FEN episode, duration of G-CSF use, costs, bacteremia frequency, and other treatments. In patients with solid tumors, the cost of filgrastim was significantly higher in the high-dose G-CSF group. Using different doses of G-CSF in high-risk FEN episodes did not show any different effects on clinical and treatment results. The dose of 5 mcg/kg/day would be more appropriate in FEN treatment.

摘要

发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)是化疗后的一种严重副作用,已知使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)对治疗结果有积极影响。在这项研究中,评估了不同剂量的 G-CSF(5 至 10mcg/kg/天)对高危 FN 患者治疗结果的影响。2017 年 6 月至 2018 年 10 月,共有 62 名患者的 124 例高危 FN 发作被纳入该研究。根据 G-CSF 治疗剂量将发作分为 2 组,他们分别接受 5 至 10mcg/kg/天的治疗。记录了患者的临床特征、接受的治疗、实验室检查结果、微生物学结果和成本分析。两组患者从中性粒细胞减少症恢复的平均时间、发热持续时间、总住院时间、FN 发作持续时间、G-CSF 使用时间、成本、菌血症频率和其他治疗方面无统计学差异。在实体瘤患者中,高剂量 G-CSF 组的非格司亭费用明显更高。在高危 FN 发作中使用不同剂量的 G-CSF 对临床和治疗结果没有显示出任何不同的影响。5mcg/kg/天的剂量在 FN 治疗中可能更合适。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Different Doses of Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor in the Treatment of High-risk Febrile Neutropenia in Children With Cancer.不同剂量粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗儿童恶性肿瘤并发高危发热性中性粒细胞减少症的比较。
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2020 Nov;42(8):e738-e744. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001940.
2
Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor decrease febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy in children with cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.预防性粒细胞集落刺激因子和粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子可降低癌症患儿化疗后的发热性中性粒细胞减少症:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Aug 15;22(16):3350-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.106.
3
Randomized comparison of antibiotics with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in children with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少症患儿使用抗生素联合或不联合粒细胞集落刺激因子的随机对照比较:儿童肿瘤学组报告
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005 Sep;45(3):274-80. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20366.
4
Prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) after conventional chemotherapy in children with cancer.癌症患儿接受传统化疗后预防性给予粒细胞集落刺激因子(非格司亭)。
Stem Cells. 1995 May;13(3):289-94. doi: 10.1002/stem.5530130310.
5
Therapeutic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for established febrile neutropenia: effect on costs from a hospital perspective.粒细胞集落刺激因子用于已确诊的发热性中性粒细胞减少症的治疗:从医院角度看对成本的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(4):343-51. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725040-00006.
6
Comparison of filgrastim and lenograstim in pediatric solid tumors.非格司亭与来格司亭在小儿实体瘤中的比较。
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2013 Oct;30(7):655-61. doi: 10.3109/08880018.2013.828144.
7
Lack of benefit of granulocyte macrophage or granulocyte colony stimulating factor in patients with febrile neutropenia.粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子或粒细胞集落刺激因子对发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者无益处。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2002 May;52(5):206-10.
8
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of high-risk febrile neutropenia: a multicenter randomized trial.粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗高危发热性中性粒细胞减少症:一项多中心随机试验
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Jan 3;93(1):31-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.1.31.
9
Efficacy of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in neutropenic children with malignancies.重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子和重组人粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子对恶性肿瘤中性粒细胞减少儿童的疗效
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1995 Nov-Dec;12(6):551-8. doi: 10.3109/08880019509030769.
10
Pharmacoeconomics of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a critical review.粒细胞集落刺激因子的药物经济学:一项批判性综述。
Adv Ther. 2014 Jul;31(7):683-95. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0133-9. Epub 2014 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical utility of procalcitonin in bacterial infections in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.降钙素原在造血干细胞移植患者细菌感染中的临床应用价值
Am J Blood Res. 2020 Dec 15;10(6):339-344. eCollection 2020.