• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单侧与双侧腹部皮瓣乳房重建不良结局发生率的比较研究:一项荟萃分析。

A comparative study for the rate of adverse outcomes in unilateral and bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Cao Zheming, Cao Jiri, Pang Xiaoyang, Du Wei, Wu Panfeng

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University.

Xiangya Nursing School of Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 11;99(37):e22096. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022096.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000022096
PMID:32925752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7489626/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adverse outcomes after unilateral vs bilateral breast reconstruction involve an unknown level of risk that warrants thorough investigation.

METHODS

To address this research need, PubMed, Ovid, Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched through systematically from January 1, 1990, to January 1, 2019 to retrieve the relevant studies on the risk of postoperative complications after unilateral vs bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction. According to the pre-designed inclusion criteria, available data were extracted from the relevant studies, and then analyzed comparatively in order to identify the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) applying either a random or a fixed effects model.

RESULTS

Eventually, 20 studies involving 8122 female subjects met the inclusion criteria. It was found that unilateral reconstruction involved a significantly higher risk of flap loss (RR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.21-2.00; P < .05) and fat necrosis (RR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.23-2.09; P < .05) compared to bilateral reconstruction, while bilateral reconstruction involved a greater risk of abdominal hernia/bulge (RR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.25-2.24; P < .05). The risk was found to be higher following bilateral free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (fTRAM) flaps in comparison with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps (RR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.33-5.15; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The risk of postoperative flap complications in unilateral breast reconstruction is significantly higher than that in bilateral reconstruction. Contrarily, the abdominal complications were significantly higher in the bilateral group vs the unilateral group. Meanwhile, the risk of abdominal hernia/bulge complication after bilateral breast reconstruction was significantly higher with fTRAM vs DIEP. Therefore, DIEP flaps are recommended in priority for bilateral breast reconstruction, unless specifically contraindicated.

摘要

背景

单侧与双侧乳房重建后的不良结局存在未知程度的风险,值得进行深入研究。

方法

为满足这一研究需求,于1990年1月1日至2019年1月1日对PubMed、Ovid、Medline、EMBASE和Scopus数据库进行系统检索,以获取有关单侧与双侧腹直肌肌皮瓣乳房重建术后并发症风险的相关研究。根据预先设计的纳入标准,从相关研究中提取可用数据,然后进行比较分析,以便使用随机或固定效应模型确定相对风险(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

最终,20项涉及8122名女性受试者的研究符合纳入标准。结果发现,与双侧重建相比,单侧重建的皮瓣丢失风险(RR:1.56,95%CI:1.21 - 2.00;P < 0.05)和脂肪坏死风险(RR:1.60,95%CI:1.23 - 2.09;P < 0.05)显著更高,而双侧重建的腹壁疝/膨出风险更大(RR:1.67,95%CI:1.25 - 2.24;P < 0.05)。与腹壁下动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣相比,双侧游离腹直肌肌皮(fTRAM)皮瓣术后风险更高(RR:2.62,95%CI:1.33 - 5.15;P < 0.05)。

结论

单侧乳房重建术后皮瓣并发症的风险显著高于双侧重建。相反,双侧组的腹部并发症明显高于单侧组。同时,双侧乳房重建后采用fTRAM皮瓣的腹壁疝/膨出并发症风险显著高于DIEP皮瓣。因此,除非有特殊禁忌,双侧乳房重建优先推荐使用DIEP皮瓣。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/31e4bb892ee8/medi-99-e22096-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/3732c0685867/medi-99-e22096-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/063d8291c11b/medi-99-e22096-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/7140b11df6ef/medi-99-e22096-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/980f3ce0314a/medi-99-e22096-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/580ade844c74/medi-99-e22096-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/2e48c92dec1e/medi-99-e22096-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/3333cac202f8/medi-99-e22096-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/6f5ad4dea546/medi-99-e22096-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/3ff6d3dc5b69/medi-99-e22096-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/106dca0b4945/medi-99-e22096-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/e4b3652f74db/medi-99-e22096-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/f64ba0665f66/medi-99-e22096-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/5e3688e9c4cc/medi-99-e22096-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/4c7dac6e834a/medi-99-e22096-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/df6de1c6a9a3/medi-99-e22096-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/2383a19f838b/medi-99-e22096-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/31e4bb892ee8/medi-99-e22096-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/3732c0685867/medi-99-e22096-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/063d8291c11b/medi-99-e22096-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/7140b11df6ef/medi-99-e22096-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/980f3ce0314a/medi-99-e22096-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/580ade844c74/medi-99-e22096-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/2e48c92dec1e/medi-99-e22096-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/3333cac202f8/medi-99-e22096-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/6f5ad4dea546/medi-99-e22096-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/3ff6d3dc5b69/medi-99-e22096-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/106dca0b4945/medi-99-e22096-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/e4b3652f74db/medi-99-e22096-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/f64ba0665f66/medi-99-e22096-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/5e3688e9c4cc/medi-99-e22096-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/4c7dac6e834a/medi-99-e22096-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/df6de1c6a9a3/medi-99-e22096-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/2383a19f838b/medi-99-e22096-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0e1/7489626/31e4bb892ee8/medi-99-e22096-g018.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparative study for the rate of adverse outcomes in unilateral and bilateral abdominal flap breast reconstruction: A meta-analysis.单侧与双侧腹部皮瓣乳房重建不良结局发生率的比较研究:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 11;99(37):e22096. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022096.
2
Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.肥胖对采用保留肌肉的腹直肌肌皮瓣、腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣和腹壁下浅动脉皮瓣进行乳房重建术后并发症的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76(5):576-84. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000400.
3
Abdominal wall following free TRAM or DIEP flap reconstruction: a meta-analysis and critical review.游离腹直肌肌皮瓣或腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣重建术后的腹壁:一项荟萃分析与批判性综述
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Sep;124(3):752-764. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818b7533.
4
Immediate Bilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Abdominally Based Flaps: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database.即刻双侧乳房重建术采用腹部皮瓣:全国住院患者样本数据库分析。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019 Oct;35(8):594-601. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688719. Epub 2019 May 10.
5
The increased risk of adverse outcomes in bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction compared to unilateral reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.双侧腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房再造术相较于单侧重建术的不良结局风险增加:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Feb;67(2):143-56. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.10.024. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
6
Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.常见乳腺癌根治术后乳房重建技术 2 年并发症发生率比较。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Oct 1;153(10):901-908. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1687.
7
Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps.游离与带蒂 TRAM 和 DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建术的皮瓣灌注和供区并发症的荟萃分析。
Breast. 2018 Apr;38:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
8
Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?采用腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣(DIEP皮瓣)或保留肌肉的游离横腹直肌肌皮瓣(MS-2游离TRAM皮瓣)进行乳房重建:有差异吗?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Feb;115(2):436-44; discussion 445-6. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000149404.57087.8e.
9
Complications in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Unilateral Versus Bilateral Reconstructions.乳腺癌乳房切除术后腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建的并发症:一项比较单侧与双侧重建的前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;24(6):1465-1474. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5807-5. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
10
Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.网片在游离 TRAM 皮瓣和保留肌肉的游离 TRAM 皮瓣供区修复中的应用,其腹部并发症发生率与 DIEP 皮瓣重建相当。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Aug;126(2):367-374. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de1b7e.

引用本文的文献

1
Unilateral Versus Bilateral Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.单侧与双侧腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建:系统评价与Meta分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Dec 5;12(12):e6359. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006359. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Outcomes of posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release for repair of abdominally based breast reconstruction donor site hernias.腹横肌释放的后入路腹部分离术治疗以腹部为基础的乳房再造供区疝的结果。
Hernia. 2024 Apr;28(2):507-516. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02942-5. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Operative Time and Flap Failure in Unilateral and Bilateral Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.单侧及双侧游离皮瓣乳房重建的手术时间与皮瓣失败情况
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Jul;34(6):428-435. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1627445. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
2
Donor site morbidity in DIEP free flap breast reconstructions: A comparison of unilateral, bilateral, and bipedicled surgical procedure types.腹壁下动脉穿支游离皮瓣乳房重建术中供区并发症:单侧、双侧和双蒂手术方式的比较
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Nov;70(11):1505-1513. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.044. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
3
Complications in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Unilateral Versus Bilateral Reconstructions.
Do bilateral procedures further increase the complications for autologous breast reconstruction in obese patients?
双侧手术会进一步增加肥胖患者自体乳房重建的并发症吗?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Dec;202(3):435-442. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07082-z. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
4
Long-Term Outcome Analysis and Technical Refinements after Autologous Breast Reconstruction with PAP Flap: What We Have Learnt.使用胸大肌前皮瓣进行自体乳房重建后的长期结果分析及技术改进:我们所学到的经验
Breast Care (Basel). 2022 Oct;17(5):450-459. doi: 10.1159/000524309. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
乳腺癌乳房切除术后腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建的并发症:一项比较单侧与双侧重建的前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;24(6):1465-1474. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5807-5. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
4
Complications in unilateral versus bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions: A multicentre study.单侧与双侧腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建的并发症:一项多中心研究。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Sep;69(9):1291-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 May 3.
5
Preoperative computed tomography angiography for planning DIEP flap breast reconstruction reduces operative time and overall complications.用于规划腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建的术前计算机断层血管造影可减少手术时间和总体并发症。
Gland Surg. 2016 Apr;5(2):93-8. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.05.17.
6
Weight Measurement and Volumetric Displacement of Breast Implants and Tissue Expanders: Why Port and Shell Volumes Matter in Breast Reconstruction, Augmentation, and Revision.乳房植入物和组织扩张器的重量测量与体积置换:为何端口和外壳体积在乳房重建、隆胸及修复中至关重要。
Clin Plast Surg. 2015 Oct;42(4):481-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2015.06.010. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
7
Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited.再谈临床试验中的荟萃分析。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt A):139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
8
Optimizing Efficiency in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.优化腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建的效率
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Aug;75(2):186-92. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000559.
9
The DIEP flap breast reconstruction: Starting from scratch in a university hospital.腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建术:一所大学医院的从零开始之路。
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2015 Jun;60(3):171-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
10
ASPS clinical practice guideline summary on breast reconstruction with expanders and implants.美国整形外科学会关于使用扩张器和植入物进行乳房重建的临床实践指南摘要
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Oct;134(4):648e-655e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000541.