• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声诊断人工耳蜗磁体脱位:手术复位患者的回顾性研究及术前超声检查。

Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Magnet Dislocation of Cochlear Implants: A Retrospective Study in Patients With Surgical Magnet Repositioning and Preinterventional Ultrasound Examination.

机构信息

Medical Faculty, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2020 Oct;41(9):e1098-e1104. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002752.

DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002752
PMID:32925844
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether ultrasound is a reliable diagnostic tool to identify magnet dislocation in patients with cochlear implant.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

A tertiary referral medical center.

PATIENTS

Patients with cochlear implant who presented with the suspicion of magnet dislocation between January 1, 2009 and July 31, 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Preinterventional ultrasound with subsequent surgical magnet repositioning.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Accuracy of ultrasound in detecting magnet dislocation; intraoperative extent of magnet dislocation.

RESULTS

Out of the 28 included patients (n = 28 magnets, 36% ♀; 51.6 years [±19.0 yr]) the diagnosis by the preoperative ultrasound was confirmed intraoperatively in 25 patients (89%). In two cases (7%), tissue swelling impeded the determination of the magnet by the preoperative ultrasound. In one case, ultrasound misdiagnosed the magnet as not dislocated. During revision surgery, all 28 magnets were repositioned successfully revealing a predominant partial dislocation (86%) compared with complete magnet dislocation (14%).

CONCLUSION

In CI-patients undergoing 1.5 Tesla MRI, partial magnet dislocation occurs much more frequently than complete magnet dislocation. The clinical suspicion of a dislocated cochlear implant magnet can be accurately confirmed by preoperative ultrasound. Thus, preoperative diagnostic ultrasound can be advocated as the diagnostic tool of first choice.

摘要

目的

探讨超声检查是否能可靠地诊断人工耳蜗植入患者磁铁脱位。

设计

回顾性分析。

设置

三级转诊医疗中心。

患者

2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 7 月 31 日期间,疑似人工耳蜗植入磁铁脱位的患者。

干预

术前超声检查,随后进行磁铁复位手术。

主要观察指标

超声诊断磁铁脱位的准确性;术中磁铁脱位的程度。

结果

28 例患者(28 个磁铁,36%为女性;51.6 岁[±19.0 岁])中,25 例(89%)患者的术前超声诊断在术中得到了证实。在 2 例(7%)中,组织肿胀妨碍了术前超声对磁铁的判断。在 1 例中,超声误诊磁铁未脱位。在翻修手术中,所有 28 个磁铁均成功复位,显示出以部分脱位(86%)为主,完全磁铁脱位(14%)少见。

结论

在接受 1.5T MRI 检查的人工耳蜗植入患者中,部分磁铁脱位比完全磁铁脱位更为常见。术前超声检查可准确诊断人工耳蜗植入磁铁脱位,因此术前诊断性超声检查可作为首选诊断工具。

相似文献

1
Ultrasound in Diagnosis of Magnet Dislocation of Cochlear Implants: A Retrospective Study in Patients With Surgical Magnet Repositioning and Preinterventional Ultrasound Examination.超声诊断人工耳蜗磁体脱位:手术复位患者的回顾性研究及术前超声检查。
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Oct;41(9):e1098-e1104. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002752.
2
Ultrasound-Controlled Manual Magnet Repositioning in Magnet Dislocation of Cochlear Implants.超声引导下人工手动复位人工耳蜗植入体磁体脱位
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Jun 1;42(5):e536-e542. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003019.
3
Risk of magnetic resonance imaging-induced magnet dislocation for different types of cochlear implants: a single-center retrospective study.不同类型人工耳蜗植入术后行磁共振检查致磁铁脱位的风险:单中心回顾性研究。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Apr 21;52(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40463-023-00633-w.
4
Revision surgery due to magnet dislocation in cochlear implant patients: an emerging complication.因磁体脱位导致的人工耳蜗植入患者的翻修手术:一种新兴并发症。
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Jan;35(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182a5d2c5.
5
Cochlear implant magnet dislocation after MRI: surgical management and outcome.MRI 后耳蜗植入磁铁脱位:手术治疗及结果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 May;277(5):1297-1304. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05826-x. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
6
Dislocation of cochlear implant magnet during 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging despite head bandaging, and its repositioning using an endoscopic approach.尽管头部已包扎,但在1.5特斯拉磁共振成像期间人工耳蜗磁体仍发生脱位,并采用内镜方法对其进行重新定位。
J Laryngol Otol. 2018 Oct;132(10):943-945. doi: 10.1017/S0022215118001421. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
7
Magnet dislocation following magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant users: Diagnostic pathways and managment.人工耳蜗植入者磁共振成像后磁体脱位:诊断途径与管理
Cochlear Implants Int. 2021 Jul;22(4):195-202. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2021.1872906. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
8
Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Cochlear Implant Magnet in Place: Safety and Imaging Quality.植入耳蜗磁体后的磁共振成像:安全性与成像质量。
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jul;36(6):965-71. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000666.
9
Cochlear Implant Magnet Dislocation: Simulations and Measurements of Force and Torque at 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging.人工耳蜗磁铁脱位:1.5T 磁共振成像时的力和扭矩模拟与测量。
Ear Hear. 2021 Sep/Oct;42(5):1276-1283. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001013.
10
Comparison of bandaging techniques to prevent cochlear implant magnet displacement following MRI.比较各种包扎技术以预防 MRI 后耳蜗植入体磁铁移位。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Nov;278(11):4209-4216. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06504-8. Epub 2021 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Brazilian Society of Otology task force - cochlear implant ‒ recommendations based on strength of evidence.巴西耳科学会特别工作组 - 人工耳蜗植入 - 基于证据强度的建议
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jan-Feb;91(1):101512. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101512. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
2
Prospective study on magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant patients.前瞻性研究耳蜗植入患者的磁共振成像。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Mar;281(3):1231-1242. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08224-1. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
3
Diagnosing complications following cochlear implantation using transcutaneous ultrasound.
使用经皮超声诊断人工耳蜗植入术后并发症。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Aug;279(8):3867-3873. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07128-2. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
4
Magnet and receiver-stimulator displacement after cochlear implantation: Clinical characters and management approaches.人工耳蜗植入后磁铁和接收器-刺激器移位:临床特征和处理方法。
Saudi Med J. 2021 Aug;42(8):813-824. doi: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.8.20210294.