• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏手术患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术:文献的荟萃分析与系统评价

Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Cardiac Surgery: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Literature.

作者信息

Latif Azka, Lateef Noman, Ahsan Muhammad Junaid, Kapoor Vikas, Usman Rana Mohammad, Cooper Stephen, Andukuri Venkata, Mirza Mohsin, Ashfaq Muhammad Zubair, Khouzam Rami

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68124, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2020 Sep 10;7(3):36. doi: 10.3390/jcdd7030036.

DOI:10.3390/jcdd7030036
PMID:32927705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7570107/
Abstract

The number of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and a history of prior cardiac surgery has increased. Prior cardiac surgery increases the risk of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. To evaluate the impact of prior cardiac surgery on clinical endpoints in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), we performed a literature search using PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases. The clinical endpoints included in our study were 30-day mortality, 1-2-year mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), bleeding, stroke, procedural time, and duration of hospital stay. Seven studies, which included a total of 8221 patients, were selected. Our study found that TAVR was associated with a lower incidence of stroke and bleeding complications. There was no significant difference in terms of AKI, 30-day all-cause mortality, and 1-2-year all-cause mortality between the two groups. The average procedure time and duration of hospital stay were 170 min less ( ≤ 0.01) and 3.6 days shorter ( < 0.01) in patients with TAVR, respectively. In patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft and severe AS, both TAVR and SAVR are reasonable options. However, TAVR may be associated with a lower incidence of complications like stroke and perioperative bleeding, in addition to a shorter length of stay.

摘要

重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)且有心脏手术史的患者数量有所增加。既往心脏手术会增加接受主动脉瓣置换术患者出现不良结局的风险。为评估既往心脏手术对经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)与外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)患者临床终点的影响,我们使用PubMed、Embase、谷歌学术和Scopus数据库进行了文献检索。我们研究中纳入的临床终点包括30天死亡率、1 - 2年死亡率、急性肾损伤(AKI)、出血、中风、手术时间和住院时间。共选取了7项研究,涉及8221例患者。我们的研究发现,TAVR与中风和出血并发症的发生率较低相关。两组在AKI、30天全因死亡率和1 - 2年全因死亡率方面无显著差异。TAVR患者的平均手术时间和住院时间分别减少了170分钟(≤0.01)和3.6天(<0.01)。对于有冠状动脉搭桥术史和重度AS的患者,TAVR和SAVR都是合理的选择。然而,TAVR除了住院时间较短外,还可能与中风和围手术期出血等并发症的发生率较低相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f287/7570107/f60527c69f19/jcdd-07-00036-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f287/7570107/8157b09cafdb/jcdd-07-00036-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f287/7570107/3d6b98954249/jcdd-07-00036-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f287/7570107/7ec12a3fea6d/jcdd-07-00036-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f287/7570107/74a42bd4aebe/jcdd-07-00036-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f287/7570107/f60527c69f19/jcdd-07-00036-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f287/7570107/8157b09cafdb/jcdd-07-00036-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f287/7570107/3d6b98954249/jcdd-07-00036-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f287/7570107/7ec12a3fea6d/jcdd-07-00036-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f287/7570107/74a42bd4aebe/jcdd-07-00036-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f287/7570107/f60527c69f19/jcdd-07-00036-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Cardiac Surgery: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Literature.心脏手术患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术:文献的荟萃分析与系统评价
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2020 Sep 10;7(3):36. doi: 10.3390/jcdd7030036.
2
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Trends in Utilization and Propensity-Matched Analysis of In-Hospital Outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者的外科主动脉瓣置换术:利用趋势和院内结局的倾向匹配分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr;11(4):e006179. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006179.
3
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement is Associated with Comparable Clinical Outcomes to Open Aortic Valve Surgery but with a Reduced Length of In-Patient Hospital Stay: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与开放性主动脉瓣手术的临床结局相当,但住院时间缩短:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Mar;26(3):285-295. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement- management of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing aortic valve interventions: surgical compared to catheter-based approaches in hybrid procedures.经导管主动脉瓣置换术- 主动脉瓣介入治疗中合并严重冠状动脉疾病患者的管理:杂交手术中经导管与外科手术方法的比较。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 May 14;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1087-2.
5
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with previous coronary artery bypass surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.既往接受冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 15;215:14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.033. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
6
The impact of mitral stenosis on outcomes of aortic valve stenosis patient undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve replacement.二尖瓣狭窄对接受外科主动脉瓣置换术或经导管主动脉瓣置换术的主动脉瓣狭窄患者预后的影响。
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):655-660. doi: 10.1111/joic.12519. Epub 2018 May 17.
7
Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement after Previous Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.既往心脏手术后经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cardiol Res Pract. 2018 Apr 5;2018:4615043. doi: 10.1155/2018/4615043. eCollection 2018.
8
Outcomes of surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement in nonagenarians- a systematic review and meta-analysis.非agenarians中外科手术与经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结局——一项系统评价和荟萃分析。 (注:这里“agenarians”有误,可能是“nonagenarians”即九旬老人之意,按纠正后词汇翻译的完整译文:九旬老人中外科手术与经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结局——一项系统评价和荟萃分析。)
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021 Jan 26;11(1):128-134. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2020.1843235.
9
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.曾接受冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jan;101(1):72-9; discussion 79. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.06.067. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
10
Hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in female in the United States.美国女性经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的医院治疗结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 1;91(4):813-819. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27362. Epub 2017 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Caregiving Burden of Japan's Older Population Living With Valvular Heart Disease.日本老年瓣膜性心脏病患者的照护负担
Sage Open Aging. 2025 Jun 25;11:30495334251347099. doi: 10.1177/30495334251347099. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Non-invasive Real-Time Hemodynamic Monitoring During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Case Series.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的非侵入性实时血流动力学监测:病例系列
Cureus. 2025 May 4;17(5):e83468. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83468. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Aortic Valve Replacement in the Current Era.当代的主动脉瓣置换术

本文引用的文献

1
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Cardiac Surgery in the Randomized PARTNER 2A Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在随机 PARTNER 2A 试验中既往心脏手术患者中的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 12;11(21):2207-2216. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
2
Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-Surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置入术(ViV-TAVI)中的瓣中瓣技术与再次外科主动脉瓣置换术(redo-SAVR):一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):661-671. doi: 10.1111/joic.12520. Epub 2018 May 20.
3
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 21;14(5):1447. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051447.
4
Incidence of aortic valve reintervention in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized studies.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄患者的主动脉瓣再次干预发生率:随机研究的系统评价和更新的荟萃分析
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jan;73(1):12-22. doi: 10.1007/s11748-024-02090-2. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
5
Mediastinal mayhem: the challenges of incidental thoracic arteriovenous malformations-a case report.纵隔之乱:偶然发现的胸段动静脉畸形的挑战——病例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024 Aug 27;8(9):ytae454. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae454. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for pure aortic regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 33,484 patients.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗单纯主动脉瓣反流:33484 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jan 23;24(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03667-0.
7
Transcatheter Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Valve Stenosis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis with Different Populations.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄患者:不同人群的系统评价和荟萃分析概述。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Jun;120(7):e20220701. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220701.
8
Advances in transcatheter aortic valve implantation, part 2: perioperative care.经导管主动脉瓣植入术的进展,第2部分:围手术期护理。
BJA Educ. 2021 Jul;21(7):264-269. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Trends in Utilization and Propensity-Matched Analysis of In-Hospital Outcomes.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术与冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者的外科主动脉瓣置换术:利用趋势和院内结局的倾向匹配分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr;11(4):e006179. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006179.
4
Pros and cons of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的利弊
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep;6(5):444-452. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.09.15.
5
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The New Standard in Patients With Previous Coronary Bypass Grafting?经导管主动脉瓣置换术:既往冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的新标准?
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 24;9(20):2137-2143. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.035.
6
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.曾接受冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jan;101(1):72-9; discussion 79. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.06.067. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
7
Outcomes of Treatment of Nonagenarians With Severe Aortic Stenosis.老年重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的治疗结果
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jul;100(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.045. Epub 2015 May 23.
8
Conventional aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with previous cardiac surgery.曾接受心脏手术患者的传统主动脉瓣置换术或经导管主动脉瓣植入术。
J Cardiol. 2015 Oct;66(4):292-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 May 11.
9
Propensity matched analysis of longterm outcomes following transcatheter based aortic valve implantation versus classic aortic valve replacement in patients with previous cardiac surgery.对曾接受心脏手术的患者进行经导管主动脉瓣植入术与传统主动脉瓣置换术长期预后的倾向匹配分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Jun 10;9:99. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-99.
10
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft operation: a PARTNER trial subgroup analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗既往冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的比较:PARTNER 试验亚组分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;98(1):1-7; discussion 7-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.02.079. Epub 2014 Jun 2.