Philips Cyriac Abby, Rajesh Sasidharan, George Tom, Ahamed Rizwan, Mohanan Meera, Augustine Philip
The Liver Unit and Monarch Liver Lab, Cochin Gastroenterology Group, Ernakulam Medical Center, Kochi, 682 028, India.
Interventional Radiology, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cochin Gastroenterology Group, Ernakulam Medical Center, Kochi, 682 028, India.
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug;39(4):377-387. doi: 10.1007/s12664-020-01042-x. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
Portosystemic shunts (PSS) are associated with recurrent or persistent hepatic encephalopathy (HE), severe portal hypertensive (PHT) complications, and poor survival in cirrhosis patients. Shunt embolization improves HE in patients with recurrent or persistent HE. The role of early shunt embolization (ESE) in comparison with no and late SE (LSE) in cirrhosis patients with PSS and associated clinical outcomes are not studied.
ESE was defined as occlusion of PSS in patients with the first episode of spontaneous HE, while LSE was that when performed in patients with recurrent/persistent PSS-related HE. We retrospectively analyzed (November 2016 to March 2019) clinical outcomes, liver disease severity, and survival between patients undergoing ESE (n = 22) vs. LSE (n = 23) and compared ESE with matched historical controls (n = 22) not undergoing shunt embolization, followed-up for 18 months.
Males predominated, and the lienorenal type of shunt was the most frequent. Significantly larger and multiple shunts were noted in the LSE group. Arterial ammonia, total bilirubin, and Child-Pugh scores were significantly higher at baseline in the LSE group. Post-procedure length of stay in the intensive unit (mean 0.6 vs. 2.1 days; p = 0.04), infections (31.8% vs. 66.7% beyond 100 days; p = 0.02), recurrence of HE in first 9 months (4.5% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.03), and liver- and PHT-related clinical events beyond 10 months were significantly higher in LSE compared with those in the ESE group respectively. HE beyond 10 months was comparable between both the groups. 18.2% died in ESE while 60.87% died in the LSE group (p = 0.002). Compared with patients on only standard medical care, the occurrence of ascites, variceal bleeding, recurrence of HE, and portal vein thrombosis were significantly lower in those undergoing ESE, even though differences in survival were not significant.
Our study demonstrates the benefits of ESE of large PSS in patients with cirrhosis, probably by improving survival through a reduction in liver and PHT events that warrant validation through prospective randomized controlled multicenter trials.
门体分流术(PSS)与肝硬化患者反复或持续的肝性脑病(HE)、严重门静脉高压(PHT)并发症及不良生存结局相关。分流栓塞术可改善反复或持续HE患者的HE症状。早期分流栓塞术(ESE)与未行栓塞及晚期分流栓塞术(LSE)相比,在肝硬化合并PSS患者中的作用及相关临床结局尚未得到研究。
ESE定义为自发性HE首次发作患者的PSS闭塞,而LSE定义为反复/持续PSS相关HE患者接受的分流栓塞术。我们回顾性分析了(2016年11月至2019年3月)接受ESE(n = 22)与LSE(n = 23)患者的临床结局、肝病严重程度及生存率,并将ESE与未接受分流栓塞术的匹配历史对照(n = 22)进行比较,随访18个月。
男性居多,脾肾分流类型最为常见。LSE组的分流明显更大且更多。LSE组基线时的动脉血氨、总胆红素及Child-Pugh评分显著更高。术后重症监护病房住院时间(平均0.6天对2.1天;p = 0.04)、感染(100天以上31.8%对66.7%;p = 0.02)、前9个月HE复发率(4.5%对28.6%;p = 0.03)以及10个月后与肝脏和PHT相关的临床事件,LSE组均显著高于ESE组。两组10个月后的HE情况相当。ESE组18.2%死亡,LSE组60.87%死亡(p = 0.002)。与仅接受标准医疗护理的患者相比,接受ESE的患者腹水、静脉曲张出血、HE复发及门静脉血栓形成的发生率显著更低,尽管生存差异不显著。
我们的研究证明了ESE治疗肝硬化合并大型PSS患者的益处,可能是通过减少肝脏和PHT事件来提高生存率,这有待通过前瞻性随机对照多中心试验进行验证。