Williamson C C, Stoltsz W H, Mattheus A, Schiele G J
Veterinary Research Institute, Onderstepoort.
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1988 Jun;55(2):117-9.
The complement fixation test (CFT), indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT), card agglutination test for trypanosomiasis (CATT) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were compared in their application to the serological diagnosis of Trypanosoma equiperdum infection in 43 horses. The CFT remains a reliable test for dourine, especially in countries where other members of the subgenus Trypanozoon do not occur. The IFAT is a good 'back-up' test, but, requiring skilled operators it has the disadvantage of making it labour intensive, and interpretation of results subjective. This makes it more suited to small numbers of samples. The ELISA is suitable for large numbers of samples and could readily be used in routine diagnostic procedures. The CATT could be of value in field situations, although it does not appear to be as sensitive as the CFT. Its possible application under these conditions should be further investigated.
对补体结合试验(CFT)、间接荧光抗体试验(IFAT)、马媾疫锥虫病卡片凝集试验(CATT)和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)在43匹马的马媾疫锥虫感染血清学诊断中的应用进行了比较。补体结合试验对于马媾疫仍然是一种可靠的检测方法,特别是在不存在锥虫亚属其他成员的国家。间接荧光抗体试验是一种很好的“备用”检测方法,但由于需要熟练的操作人员,它具有劳动强度大以及结果解释主观的缺点。这使得它更适合少量样本。酶联免疫吸附测定适用于大量样本,并且可以很容易地用于常规诊断程序。马媾疫锥虫病卡片凝集试验在现场情况下可能有价值,尽管它似乎不如补体结合试验敏感。应进一步研究其在这些条件下的可能应用。