Department of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Department of Physiotherapy, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):1427-1435. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004499.
Evaluation of physical functioning is central to patient recovery from critical illness-it may enable the ability to determine recovery trajectories, evaluate rehabilitation efficacy, and predict individuals at highest risk of ongoing disability. The Physical Function in ICU Test-scored is one of four recommended physical functioning tools for use within the ICU; however, its utility outside the ICU is poorly understood. The De Morton Mobility Index is a common geriatric mobility tool, which has had limited evaluation in the ICU population. For the field to be able to track physical functioning recovery, we need a measurement tool that can be used in the ICU and post-ICU setting to accurately measure physical recovery. Therefore, this study sought to: 1) examine the clinimetric properties of two measures (Physical Function in ICU Test-scored and De Morton Mobility Index) and 2) transform these measures into a single measure for use across the acute care continuum.
Clinimetric analysis.
Multicenter study across four hospitals in three countries (Australia, Singapore, and Brazil).
One hundred fifty-one ICU patients.
None.
Physical function tests (Physical Function in ICU Test-scored and De Morton Mobility Index) were assessed at ICU awakening, ICU, and hospital discharge. A significant floor effect was observed for the De Morton Mobility Index at awakening (23%) and minimal ceiling effects across all time points (5-12%). Minimal floor effects were observed for the Physical Function in ICU Test-scored across all time points (1-7%) and a significant ceiling effect for Physical Function in ICU Test-scored at hospital discharge (27%). Both measures had strong concurrent validity, responsiveness, and were predictive of home discharge. A new measure was developed using Rasch analytical principles, which involves 10 items (scored out of 19) with minimal floor/ceiling effects.
Limitations exist for Physical Function in ICU Test-scored and De Morton Mobility Index when used in isolation. A new single measure was developed for use across the acute care continuum.
身体机能的评估是患者从危重病中康复的核心,它可以帮助确定康复轨迹、评估康复效果,并预测存在持续性残疾风险的个体。《重症监护病房体力测试评分》是 ICU 内推荐使用的四种身体机能评估工具之一;然而,其在 ICU 外的应用效果尚不清楚。《德莫顿活动指数》是一种常见的老年人体力活动评估工具,但其在 ICU 人群中的评估有限。为了使该领域能够跟踪身体机能的恢复情况,我们需要一种既能在 ICU 内又能在 ICU 外使用的测量工具,以准确测量身体的恢复情况。因此,本研究旨在:1)检验两种测量方法(《重症监护病房体力测试评分》和《德莫顿活动指数》)的临床有效性;2)将这些方法转化为一种可在整个急性护理连续体中使用的单一测量方法。
临床有效性分析。
跨越三个国家(澳大利亚、新加坡和巴西)的四家医院的多中心研究。
151 名 ICU 患者。
无。
在 ICU 苏醒时、ICU 期间和出院时评估身体功能测试(《重症监护病房体力测试评分》和《德莫顿活动指数》)。《德莫顿活动指数》在苏醒时出现明显的地板效应(23%),而所有时间点的天花板效应最小(5-12%)。《重症监护病房体力测试评分》在所有时间点的地板效应最小(1-7%),而在出院时出现显著的天花板效应(27%)。两种方法均具有较强的同时效度、反应性,且能预测出院回家。采用 Rasch 分析原理开发了一种新的测量方法,包含 10 项(19 分制),具有最小的地板/天花板效应。
单独使用《重症监护病房体力测试评分》和《德莫顿活动指数》存在局限性。为了在整个急性护理连续体中使用,开发了一种新的单一测量方法。