Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (Iscte), Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social (CIS-IUL), Portugal; Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas (ISCSP), Centro de Administração e Políticas Públicas (CAPP - ISCSP), Portugal.
Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (Iscte), Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Social (CIS-IUL), Portugal.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;117:104783. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104783. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
This study aims to contribute to the risk management of pharmaceuticals in the environment, illustrating risk perceptions of lay people and experts from Southwestern Europe (Portugal, Spain, and France). The psychometric paradigm was applied to assess risk regarding four hazards: pharmaceuticals in the environment (i.e., broadly framed), pharmaceuticals in treated wastewater, pharmaceuticals in drinking water, and pharmaceuticals in crops. Two factors explained most of the variance of risk assessments: dread and unknown. The dread factor combined immediacy and severity of effects, and the old nature of hazards. Pharmaceuticals in crops and drinking water scored higher in this factor, as did experts and French respondents. The unknown factor differentiated between the assessments of lay people and experts. Lay people assessed the hazards as being more known by those who were exposed but less known by science; and exposure was perceived as more voluntary and the risk as more controllable. Even though pharmaceutical residues are present in much higher concentrations in treated wastewater, risk assessments were overall higher for drinking water and crops. Moreover, data also revealed risk management preferences: whereas lay people preferred technological and awareness-type measures, experts preferred measures to improve the disposal of pharmaceutical waste and health-type measures.
本研究旨在为环境中药物的风险管理做出贡献,说明来自西南欧(葡萄牙、西班牙和法国)的普通民众和专家对风险的看法。本研究应用心理计量学范式来评估四种危害的风险:环境中的药物(即广义定义)、处理后的废水中的药物、饮用水中的药物和农作物中的药物。两个因素解释了风险评估的大部分差异:恐惧和未知。恐惧因素结合了影响的即时性和严重性,以及危害的古老本质。农作物和饮用水中的药物在这个因素上的得分更高,专家和法国人也是如此。未知因素区分了普通民众和专家的评估。普通民众认为,那些接触到这些危害的人对其了解更多,但科学界对其了解较少;而且他们认为接触是更自愿的,风险是更可控的。尽管处理后的废水中的药物残留浓度要高得多,但人们对饮用水和农作物的风险评估总体上更高。此外,数据还揭示了风险管理偏好:普通民众更喜欢技术和意识型措施,而专家则更喜欢改善药物废物处理和健康型措施。