Suppr超能文献

构建型土壤质量评估:为土地开垦、废物管理和土壤功能恢复的有前途策略提供验证。

Soil quality assessment of constructed Technosols: Towards the validation of a promising strategy for land reclamation, waste management and the recovery of soil functions.

机构信息

Department of Soil Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture / University of São Paulo (ESALQ/USP), Av. Pádua Dias 11, Piracicaba, São Paulo, 13418-900, Brazil.

Department of Soil Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture / University of São Paulo (ESALQ/USP), Av. Pádua Dias 11, Piracicaba, São Paulo, 13418-900, Brazil.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2020 Dec 15;276:111344. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111344. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

Abstract

Mine reclamation has long relied on reusing topsoil to mitigate mining impacts but recently constructed soils (i.e., Technosols) have emerged as novel technologies for restoring post mining landscapes. However, their success depends on their ability to sustain soil functions. To assess the efficiency of a limestone mine reclamation, we measured the soil quality (SQ) of a three- (SC3) and seven-year-old (SC7) Technosol under sugarcane, and one 20-year-old (P20) Technosol under pasture, constructed with limestone spoil in southeastern Brazil. Soil chemical, physical, and biological attributes were evaluated and compared with those of an adjacent natural soil (NS; Rhodic Lixisol). We also tested the Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) for assessing the SQ of the studied soils. SMAF was suitable to detect SQ changes over the years of reclamation. After three and seven years under sugarcane cultivation, the Technosols showed similar SQ indexes (= 0.70 and 0.67) to that of the native soil (SQ = 0.69), whereas after 20 years under pasture the SQ (= 0.88) of P20 was superior to that of NS. Overall, the Technosols recovered most of the ecosystem services expected for healthy soils, especially in P20, where carbon stocks were 2.7 times higher than in NS (82.1 vs 30.35 Mg C ha). We highlight the importance of using soil quality assessment tools, such as SMAF, in mine reclamation. In summary, Technosols from limestone wastes could restore basic soil functions under tropical environmental conditions within only 20 years.

摘要

矿山复垦长期以来一直依赖于再利用表土来减轻采矿的影响,但最近构建的土壤(即“人工合成土壤”)已成为恢复矿山后景观的新技术。然而,它们的成功取决于其维持土壤功能的能力。为了评估一个石灰石矿复垦的效率,我们测量了巴西东南部一个种植甘蔗的三年(SC3)和七年(SC7)龄人工合成土壤以及一个种植牧草二十年(P20)龄人工合成土壤的土壤质量(SQ),这些土壤都是用石灰石废料建造的。我们评估并比较了土壤的化学、物理和生物属性,并将其与相邻自然土壤(NS;红壤)的属性进行了比较。我们还测试了土壤管理评估框架(SMAF)来评估所研究土壤的 SQ。SMAF 适用于检测多年复垦过程中的 SQ 变化。在种植甘蔗三年和七年之后,人工合成土壤的 SQ 指数(=0.70 和 0.67)与原生土壤(SQ=0.69)相似,而在种植牧草 20 年后,P20 的 SQ(=0.88)优于 NS。总的来说,人工合成土壤恢复了大多数健康土壤所期望的生态系统服务,尤其是在 P20 土壤中,其碳储量比 NS 高 2.7 倍(82.1 比 30.35 Mg C ha)。我们强调了在矿山复垦中使用土壤质量评估工具(如 SMAF)的重要性。总之,在热带环境条件下,仅用 20 年时间,石灰石废料就能恢复基本的土壤功能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验