Bertacini Daiane Munhoz Mira, Beleza Ana Carolina Sartorato, Driusso Patricia
Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 Sep;63(5):577-585. doi: 10.5468/ogs.19236. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
Parity is associated with an increased risk of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of parity on this musculature.
This cross-sectional study was completed at the Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, Brazil. In total, 143 women participated in the study and were classified into three groups according to parity: nulliparae, primiparae, and secundiparae women. All parous participants had last given birth between 1 and 6 years prior. Pelvic floor muscle function was assessed through unidigital vaginal palpation using the PERFECT scheme, with the contraction grade classified according to the Modified Oxford Scale and through manometry.
There was no difference in scores on the Modified Oxford Scale (the means and standard deviations were 2.5±0.8 in nulliparae women, 2.3±0.9 in primiparae women, and 2.2±0.9 in secundiparae women; P=0.482) and manometry findings (the means and standard deviations were 42.3±22.7 in nulliparae women, 35.0±21.8 in primiparae women, and 33.2±20.0 in secundiparae women; P=0.144) among the assessed groups.
Parity had no effect, regardless of mode of birth, on the function of pelvic floor muscles and the presence of urinary symptoms, such as long-term urinary incontinence after birth.
经产与盆底肌肉功能障碍风险增加相关。本研究旨在评估经产对该肌肉组织的长期影响。
这项横断面研究在巴西圣卡洛斯联邦大学物理治疗系完成。共有143名女性参与研究,根据经产情况分为三组:未生育女性、初产妇和经产妇。所有经产妇最后一次分娩时间在1至6年前。采用PERFECT方案通过单指阴道触诊评估盆底肌肉功能,收缩等级根据改良牛津量表分类,并通过压力测定法进行评估。
改良牛津量表评分(未生育女性的均值和标准差为2.5±0.8,初产妇为2.3±0.9,经产妇为2.2±0.9;P=0.482)和压力测定结果(未生育女性的均值和标准差为42.3±22.7,初产妇为35.0±21.8,经产妇为33.2±20.0;P=0.144)在评估组之间无差异。
无论分娩方式如何,经产对盆底肌肉功能及产后长期尿失禁等泌尿系统症状均无影响。