MGH IOHS Consulting, Raleigh, NC, USA.
12278 Department of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2020 Nov/Dec;135(6):831-841. doi: 10.1177/0033354920953211. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
Errors and misreporting on death certificates are common, along with potential inaccuracies in cause-of-death coding. We characterized and compared fatalities by animal-encounter mentions reported as underlying cause of death (UCD) with animal-encounter mentions reported as multiple cause of death (MCD) to determine factors associated with misreporting UCD.
We analyzed fatality data from 1999-2016 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging ONline Data for Epidemiologic Research by UCD and MCD animal-encounter mentions ( codes W53-59, X20-27 and X29, T63.0-63.6, T63.8-63.9, and T78.2-78.4). We examined differences in reporting by age, sex, race, autopsy (yes, no, unknown), allergic reactions, and toxicities.
The number of animal-encounter mentions by UCD was 3638 (202 average per year) and by MCD was 4280 (238 average per year), a difference of 18% (n = 642; 36 average per year) by MCD analysis. The number of nonvenomous animal-encounter mentions increased 20% (from 2138 UCD to 2567 MCD), and the number of venomous animal-encounter mentions increased 14% (from 1500 UCD to 1713 MCD). Decedents aged ≥65 had the highest additional number of animal-encounter mentions among all age groups, primarily encounters with other reptiles (n = 113), other mammals (n = 71), and dogs (n = 42). Of 642 MCD additional animal-encounter mentions, heart disease (n = 211, 33%) and infections (n = 146, 23%) represented more than half of the UCD. Of 553 dog-encounter fatalities, 165 (30%) were among children aged ≤4.
Animal-encounter fatalities, analyzed by UCD alone, may be underreported. An initiating animal injury, complicated by comorbidities and fatality, may obscure the causal chain, resulting in misreporting UCD. Ongoing training for medical certifiers is recommended, highlighting accurate identification of UCD and contributing causes in the causal chain of death.
死亡证明上的错误和误报很常见,死因编码也可能存在潜在的不准确。我们通过将死因报告为根本死因(UCD)的动物接触提及与死因报告为多种死因(MCD)的动物接触提及进行比较和分析,确定与 UCD 误报相关的因素。
我们分析了 1999 年至 2016 年疾病控制与预防中心广范围在线流行病学研究死因数据,分析 UCD 和 MCD 动物接触提及(代码 W53-59、X20-27 和 X29、T63.0-63.6、T63.8-63.9 和 T78.2-78.4)。我们检查了年龄、性别、种族、尸检(有、无、未知)、过敏反应和毒性等因素对报告的差异。
UCD 报告的动物接触提及数为 3638 例(平均每年 202 例),MCD 报告的动物接触提及数为 4280 例(平均每年 238 例),MCD 分析差异为 18%(n=642;平均每年 36 例)。非毒蛇类动物接触提及数增加 20%(从 UCD 的 2138 例增加到 MCD 的 2567 例),毒蛇类动物接触提及数增加 14%(从 UCD 的 1500 例增加到 MCD 的 1713 例)。≥65 岁的死者是所有年龄组中动物接触提及数增加最多的,主要是与其他爬行动物(n=113)、其他哺乳动物(n=71)和狗(n=42)的接触。在 642 例 MCD 额外的动物接触提及中,心脏病(n=211,33%)和感染(n=146,23%)占 UCD 的一半以上。在 553 例狗类接触致死事件中,165 例(30%)发生在≤4 岁的儿童中。
仅通过 UCD 分析的动物接触致死事件可能被低估了。起始动物伤害,加上合并症和死亡,可能会使因果链变得模糊,导致 UCD 误报。建议对医疗认证人员进行持续培训,重点是准确识别 UCD 和死亡因果链中的促成因素。