Behavioral vs beta-blocker therapy in patients with primary hypertension: effects on blood pressure, left ventricular function and mass, and the pressor surge of social stress anger.

We compared the relative effects of relaxation therapy, conventional hygienic techniques, and a beta-receptor blocker, atenolol, on control of arterial pressure, left ventricular mass, and diastolic function in patients with mild primary hypertension. Furthermore, we related these effects to baseline neural tone and its changes and assessed the efficacy of relaxation or the pressor surge of "social stress" anger. In group I left ventricular mass index was related to both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.46; p less than 0.05). Plasma norepinephrine was related to age (r = 0.33; p less than 0.01). Slope was inversely related to both plasma norepinephrine (r = -0.29; p less than 0.05) and age (r = -0.31; p less than 0.05). Relaxation therapy reduced both supine systolic and diastolic blood pressures, 4.5% and 7.6%, respectively, but did not affect plasma norepinephrine. Hygienic informational therapy reduced plasma norepinephrine by 18%, (p less than 0.05) and did not change blood pressure. Blood pressure responders to nondrug therapy (i.e., diastolic blood pressure reduction of 7% or more) had a 7% reduction of left ventricular mass index (p less than 0.02). On the other hand, atenolol reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 10% and 15%, respectively, (p less than 0.01) and improved left ventricular function by 17% (p less than 0.05) without a significant change in left ventricular mass index. Finally, relaxation therapy but not hygienic therapy reduced systolic blood pressures 4% and 6%, respectively (p less than 0.01), both before and during social stress anger.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)