Associate Professor, Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.
Associate Dean for Graduate Medical Education and Professor of Family Medicine, Augusta University.
MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Sep 11;16:10959. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10959.
Most interventions to date regarding breaking bad news focus on late-stage disease or disclosing a cancer diagnosis. Little attention has been given to delivery of chronic metabolic disease diagnoses such as prediabetes/type 2 diabetes.
Informed by the American Diabetes Association standards of care and formative research conducted by our research team, we developed this curriculum through the six-step approach to curriculum development. The curriculum consists of a 2- or 3-hour intervention that teaches medical decision-making, interpersonal communication, and clinical documentation in the context of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes followed by role-play and clinical practice.
Across three cohorts, 53 clinicians completed the curriculum. Across the three iterations, learners rated the curricular intervention as worthwhile and delivered at an appropriate level. In a community hospital setting, learners scored significantly higher on a knowledge check than did a control group of six clinicians ( < .001). Learners in the community hospital also indicated high response efficacy and self-efficacy. At the academic medical center, simulated patients indicated high measures on the Diabetes Health Threat Communication Questionnaire.
The moment of diagnosis presents a key opportunity to affect patients' perceptions of the disease. This curriculum guides clinicians in making the most of diagnosis delivery. Pairing of qualitative, patient-centered research alongside the iterative curriculum design process allows the curriculum to be adaptable and scalable to multiple settings and learner types.
迄今为止,大多数关于打破坏消息的干预措施都集中在疾病晚期或披露癌症诊断上。对于像糖尿病前期/2 型糖尿病这样的慢性代谢性疾病的诊断,关注甚少。
根据美国糖尿病协会的护理标准和我们研究团队进行的形成性研究,我们通过课程开发的六步方法开发了这一课程。该课程包括一个 2 到 3 小时的干预课程,教授医学决策、人际沟通和在糖尿病前期和 2 型糖尿病背景下的临床文档,随后是角色扮演和临床实践。
在三个队列中,53 名临床医生完成了课程。在三个迭代中,学习者认为课程干预是有价值的,并且达到了适当的水平。在社区医院环境中,学习者在知识测试中的得分明显高于对照组的六名临床医生(<0.001)。社区医院的学习者还表示,他们的反应效果和自我效能感很高。在学术医疗中心,模拟患者在糖尿病健康威胁沟通问卷上的得分很高。
诊断时刻是影响患者对疾病的看法的关键机会。本课程指导临床医生充分利用诊断的提供。将定性的、以患者为中心的研究与迭代课程设计过程相结合,使课程能够适应和扩展到多个环境和学习者类型。