Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Child Obes. 2020 Sep;16(S2):S249-S254. doi: 10.1089/chi.2020.0140.
The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the need for and utility of using a taxonomic approach for evidence aggregation and meta-analyses, with focus on prevention and reduction of childhood obesity in very young children. As evidence has been generated through heterogeneous efforts, it is important that the field makes use of all available evidence to learn what works, for who, and in what circumstances. The Childhood Obesity Evidence Base (COEB) project conducted a taxonomic meta-analysis, using Grounded Theory to code elements present in reports of existing studies and initiatives, of diverse design and evaluation approaches, which were then mapped onto the levels of the socio-ecologic model. This article is the fourth in a series that describes the COEB project overall. It discusses both generally and specifically how taxonomies contribute to traditional meta-analytic methods, what questions can and cannot be answered, the method's contribution to translational (implementation) capacity, and ability to inform future efforts. The COEB project illustrates how the taxonomic meta-analytic approach broadens the evidence base, increases translational capacity for effective intervention components, and evaluates the influence of contextual elements to inform future initiatives. How the method is used to establish associations between varying intervention components, contextual elements, and outcomes is discussed. Taxonomies generated through this process can be used for meta-analysis, serving to generate topic-specific questions associated with intervention approaches and outcomes in context, which is adjunctive to traditional meta-analytic methods and can inform public health approaches.
本文旨在论证采用分类方法进行证据汇总和荟萃分析的必要性和实用性,重点关注预防和减少幼儿期肥胖。由于证据是通过各种不同的努力产生的,因此该领域利用所有可用证据来了解什么有效、对谁有效以及在什么情况下有效非常重要。儿童肥胖证据基础(COEB)项目采用扎根理论对现有研究和计划报告中的现有元素进行分类分析,这些研究和计划采用不同的设计和评估方法,然后将其映射到社会生态模型的各个层面。本文是描述 COEB 项目总体情况的系列文章中的第四篇。它既一般性地又具体地讨论了分类法如何为传统的荟萃分析方法做出贡献、可以回答哪些问题和不能回答哪些问题、该方法对转化(实施)能力的贡献以及为未来工作提供信息的能力。COEB 项目说明了分类荟萃分析方法如何拓宽证据基础、增加有效干预措施的转化能力,并评估背景因素对未来计划的影响。还讨论了如何使用该方法来确定不同干预措施、背景因素和结果之间的联系。通过该过程生成的分类法可用于荟萃分析,有助于针对特定主题提出与干预措施和背景下的结果相关的问题,这是对传统荟萃分析方法的补充,并可为公共卫生方法提供信息。