Li Zhi-Qiang, Yan Hai-Cui, Gu Jing-Jing, Yang Yong-Liang, Zhang Ming-Kui, Fang Xin-Jian
The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, The Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China.
Center of Clinical Oncology, The Second People's Hospital, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China.
Pharmacol Res. 2020 Oct;160:105194. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105194. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
The main aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhibitors of programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) and its ligand, programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors relative to platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane libraries from 2015 to 2020 were searched, along with review of studies at American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). Pooled hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and odds ratios (OR) for adverse events (AE) were calculated using STATA and Revman software.
PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone or combined with chemotherapy significantly improved OS (HR = 0.82, 95% CI:0.74-0.91, P = 0.01 or HR = 0.74, 95% CI:0.67-0.82, P = 0.001). PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone did not benefit PFS (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.89-1.10, P = 0.892), while combination therapy led to prolonged PFS (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.56-0.67, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that in NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone significantly improved both PFS and OS. In patients subjected to the combined treatment regimen, we observed significant differences in PFS among groups stratified by PD-L1 expression (p < 0.001), immune drug type (p = 0.029), gender (p = 0.014) and liver metastasis (p = 0.035) and OS among groups stratified by immune drug type (p < 0.001), gender (P = 0.001) and smoking status (P = 0.041). Safety analysis showed that combination therapy increased chemotherapy-induced adverse events (AE), while PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone were associated with a lower incidence of any grade of treatment-related AEs (TRAE). A higher incidence of Grade 3-5 TRAEs and hypothyroidism was observed with PD-1 inhibitors than PD-L1 inhibitors.
First-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with immune monotherapy or immunochemotherapy confers a greater survival benefit than chemotherapy alone. Combination of chemotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors leads to an increase in adverse events, and PD-1 inhibitors offer enhanced survival benefits and fewer adverse events than PD-L1 inhibitors. Remarkably, female patients undergoing combination therapy had longer overall survival than male patients.
本研究的主要目的是系统评估程序性细胞死亡受体1(PD-1)及其配体程序性细胞死亡配体-1(PD-L1)抑制剂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效和安全性。
检索2015年至2020年PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆中评估PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂相对于铂类化疗治疗晚期NSCLC疗效的随机对照试验,同时回顾美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)和欧洲医学肿瘤学会(ESMO)的研究。使用STATA和Revman软件计算无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的合并风险比(HR)以及不良事件(AE)的比值比(OR)。
单独使用或联合化疗的PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂显著改善了总生存期(HR = 0.82,95%CI:0.74 - 0.91,P = 0.01或HR = 0.74,95%CI:0.67 - 0.82,P = 0.001)。单独使用PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂对无进展生存期无益处(HR = 0.99,95%CI:0.89 - 1.10,P = 0.892),而联合治疗可延长无进展生存期(HR = 0.61,95%CI:0.56 - 0.67,P < 0.001)。亚组分析显示,在PD-L1≥50%的NSCLC中,单独使用PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂治疗显著改善了无进展生存期和总生存期。在接受联合治疗方案的患者中,我们观察到按PD-L1表达分层的组间无进展生存期存在显著差异(p < 0.001),按免疫药物类型分层的组间(p = 0.029)、性别分层的组间(p = 0.014)和肝转移分层的组间(p = 0.035)以及按免疫药物类型分层的组间总生存期存在显著差异(p < 0.001)、性别分层的组间(P = 0.001)和吸烟状态分层的组间(P = 0.041)。安全性分析显示,联合治疗增加了化疗引起的不良事件(AE),而单独使用PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂与任何级别的治疗相关不良事件(TRAE)发生率较低相关。与PD-L1抑制剂相比,PD-1抑制剂观察到3 - 5级TRAE和甲状腺功能减退的发生率更高。
晚期NSCLC的一线免疫单药治疗或免疫化疗比单纯化疗具有更大的生存获益。化疗与PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂联合导致不良事件增加,且PD-1抑制剂比PD-L1抑制剂提供更高的生存获益和更少的不良事件。值得注意的是,接受联合治疗的女性患者总生存期比男性患者更长。