Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK; Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK; Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Psychiatry Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, S. Paolo General Hospital, Milan, Italy; Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Brain Therapeutics, University of Milan, Italy.
Neuroscience. 2021 Jun 1;464:143-155. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.09.013. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
Disruptions in reward processing and anhedonia have long been observed in Anorexia Nervosa (AN). Interoceptive deficits have also been observed in AN, including reduced tactile pleasure. However, the extent to which this tactile anhedonia is specifically liked to an impairment in a specialised, interoceptive C-tactile system originating at the periphery, or a more top-down mechanism in the processing of tactile pleasantness remains debated. Here, we investigated differences between patients with and recovered from AN (RAN) and healthy controls (HC) in the perception of pleasantness of touch delivered in a CT-optimal versus a CT-non-optimal manner, and in their top-down, anticipatory beliefs about the perceived pleasantness of touch. To this end, we measured the anticipated pleasantness of various materials touching the skin and the perceived pleasantness of light, dynamic touch applied to the forearm of 27 women with AN, 24 women who have recovered and 30 HCs using C Tactile (CT) afferents-optimal (slow) and non-optimal (fast) velocities. Our results showed that both clinical groups anticipated tactile experiences and rated delivered tactile stimuli as less pleasant than HCs, but the latter difference was not related to the CT optimality of the stimulation. Instead, differences in the perception of CT-optimal touch were predicted by differences in top-down beliefs, alexithymia and interoceptive sensibility. Thus, tactile anhedonia in AN might persist as a trait even after otherwise successful recovery of AN and it is not linked to a bottom-up interoceptive deficit in the CT system, but rather to a learned, defective top-down anticipation of tactile pleasantness.
在神经性厌食症(AN)中,人们长期以来一直观察到奖励处理和快感缺失的中断。在 AN 中也观察到了内脏感觉缺陷,包括触觉愉悦感降低。然而,这种触觉快感缺失是否特别与外周起源的专门的、内脏感觉的 C 触觉系统的损伤有关,或者与触觉愉悦感的更自上而下的机制有关,仍然存在争议。在这里,我们研究了 AN 患者(RAN)和恢复后的患者(RAN)与健康对照组(HC)之间在以 CT 最佳和非最佳方式感知触觉愉悦度方面的差异,以及他们对触觉愉悦度的自上而下的预期信念。为此,我们测量了皮肤接触各种材料的预期愉悦度,以及前臂接受轻触和动态触觉的感知愉悦度,共有 27 名 AN 患者、24 名恢复的患者和 30 名 HC 使用 C 触觉(CT)传入-最佳(慢)和非最佳(快)速度进行测量。我们的结果表明,两个临床组都预期了触觉体验,并将所提供的触觉刺激评定为比 HC 更不愉悦,但后者的差异与刺激的 CT 最优性无关。相反,CT 最佳触觉感知的差异是由自上而下的信念、躯体感觉和内脏感觉敏感性的差异预测的。因此,即使在 AN 成功恢复后,AN 中的触觉快感缺失也可能作为一种特征持续存在,并且与 CT 系统的内感受缺陷无关,而是与自上而下的触觉愉悦感的学习缺陷有关。