Suppr超能文献

评估失语症患者的手势和言语产生模型。

Evaluating Models of Gesture and Speech Production for People With Aphasia.

机构信息

Cognitive Sciences, Linguistics Department, University of Potsdam.

Clinical Neuropsychology Research Group (EKN), Institute of Phonetics and Speech Processing, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2020 Sep;44(9):e12890. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12890.

Abstract

People with aphasia use gestures not only to communicate relevant content but also to compensate for their verbal limitations. The Sketch Model (De Ruiter, 2000) assumes a flexible relationship between gesture and speech with the possibility of a compensatory use of the two modalities. In the successor of the Sketch Model, the AR-Sketch Model (De Ruiter, 2017), the relationship between iconic gestures and speech is no longer assumed to be flexible and compensatory, but instead iconic gestures are assumed to express information that is redundant to speech. In this study, we evaluated the contradictory predictions of the Sketch Model and the AR-Sketch Model using data collected from people with aphasia as well as a group of people without language impairment. We only found compensatory use of gesture in the people with aphasia, whereas the people without language impairments made very little compensatory use of gestures. Hence, the people with aphasia gestured according to the prediction of the Sketch Model, whereas the people without language impairment did not. We conclude that aphasia fundamentally changes the relationship of gesture and speech.

摘要

患有失语症的人不仅使用手势来传达相关内容,还使用手势来弥补言语表达的局限性。草图模型(De Ruiter,2000)假设手势和言语之间具有灵活的关系,两种模态可以相互补偿。在草图模型的后继者,即 AR-草图模型(De Ruiter,2017)中,不再假设形象手势和言语之间的关系是灵活和互补的,而是假设形象手势表达的信息与言语冗余。在这项研究中,我们使用从患有失语症的人和没有语言障碍的人中收集的数据评估了草图模型和 AR-草图模型的矛盾预测。我们只发现患有失语症的人对手势有补偿性使用,而没有语言障碍的人很少对手势有补偿性使用。因此,患有失语症的人按照草图模型的预测使用手势,而没有语言障碍的人则没有。我们得出的结论是,失语症从根本上改变了手势和言语的关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验