• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化日常清洁对传统和波前引导巩膜镜片的光学和物理影响。

Quantifying the Optical and Physical Consequences of Daily Cleaning on Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses.

机构信息

University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2020 Sep;97(9):754-760. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001564.

DOI:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001564
PMID:32941335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7523501/
Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE

An equivalent 12 months of cleaning did not induce significant changes in the optical aberrations or base curves of scleral lenses.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to test whether an equivalent of 12 months of manual cleaning alters the optical and physical properties of conventional and wavefront-guided scleral lenses.

METHODS

Twelve scleral lenses (four repeats of three designs, termed A, B, and C) were manufactured in Boston XO material: design A, -5.00 D defocus; design B, -5.00 D defocus with -0.153-μm vertical coma; and design C, -5.00 D defocus with a full custom wavefront-guided correction (second to fifth Zernike radial orders) of an eye with severe keratoconus. One lens of each design group served as a control and was not cleaned. To simulate a year of cleaning, seven individuals cleaned nine lenses (three from each group) twice a day for 27 days using the palm technique and commercially available cleaners, resulting in 378 cleanings of each lens. Lens aberrations were optically profiled and base curve radii were measured at baseline and after every 42nd cleaning. Differences in higher-order root mean square (HORMS) wavefront error and base curve radii associated with cleaning were compared with clinical benchmarks and using sign tests.

RESULTS

For the experimental lenses, median change in Seidel spherical dioptric power was +0.01 D (maximum, +0.025 D). Median change in HORMS wavefront error was 0.013 μm (maximum, 0.019 μm). All lenses exhibited HORMS changes less than one-eighth equivalent diopters (P = .002). Median percentage change in HORMS wavefront error in the three wavefront-guided lenses was 0.96% (maximum, 1.25%). Median change in base curve radii was 0.00 mm, with all lenses exhibiting changes (P = .002), less than the American National Standards Institute tolerance of 0.05 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Cleaning over an equivalent 12-month period did not induce clinically significant changes in the optical or base curve properties of conventional or wavefront-guided scleral lenses.

摘要

意义

12 个月的等效清洁并未引起巩膜镜片的像差或基底曲线发生显著变化。

目的

本研究旨在测试等效 12 个月的手动清洁是否会改变传统和波前引导巩膜镜片的光学和物理特性。

方法

使用 Boston XO 材料制造了 12 个巩膜镜片(三个设计的四个重复,分别称为 A、B 和 C):设计 A,-5.00 D 远视离焦;设计 B,-5.00 D 远视离焦,带有-0.153μm 垂直彗差;设计 C,-5.00 D 远视离焦,具有严重圆锥角膜的眼睛的全定制波前引导矫正(第二至第五 Zernike 径向阶数)。每个设计组的一个镜片作为对照,不进行清洁。为了模拟一年的清洁,七个人每天使用手掌技术和市售清洁剂清洁九只镜片(每组三只)两次,每只镜片清洁 378 次,共清洁 378 次。在基线和每次第 42 次清洁后,通过光学轮廓仪测量镜片像差,并测量基底曲线半径。使用符号检验比较与清洁相关的高阶均方根(HORMS)波前误差和基底曲线半径的差异,并与临床基准进行比较。

结果

对于实验镜片,Seidel 球镜屈光力的中位数变化为+0.01 D(最大,+0.025 D)。HORMS 波前误差的中位数变化为 0.013 μm(最大,0.019 μm)。所有镜片的 HORMS 变化均小于八分之一等效屈光度(P =.002)。三个波前引导镜片的 HORMS 波前误差中位数变化率为 0.96%(最大,1.25%)。基底曲线半径的中位数变化为 0.00 mm,所有镜片均发生变化(P =.002),小于美国国家标准协会 0.05 mm 的公差。

结论

在等效 12 个月的清洁期间,传统或波前引导巩膜镜片的光学或基底曲线特性未发生临床显著变化。

相似文献

1
Quantifying the Optical and Physical Consequences of Daily Cleaning on Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses.量化日常清洁对传统和波前引导巩膜镜片的光学和物理影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2020 Sep;97(9):754-760. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001564.
2
Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia.角膜扩张症患者适应后波前引导型与最佳传统巩膜镜的比较
Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Apr;96(4):238-247. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001365.
3
Wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in keratoconus.圆锥角膜的波前引导巩膜镜矫正
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Oct;91(10):1221-30. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000275.
4
Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses?聚合物涂层会改变传统和波前引导巩膜镜的像差吗?
Optom Vis Sci. 2020 Jan;97(1):28-35. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001462.
5
The Impact of Misaligned Wavefront-guided Correction in a Scleral Lens for the Highly Aberrated Eye.巩膜镜片对高度像差眼的波前引导校正失准的影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2020 Sep;97(9):732-740. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001577.
6
Wavefront-guided scleral lens prosthetic device for keratoconus.用于圆锥角膜的波前引导巩膜镜片修复装置。
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Apr;90(4):314-23. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318288d19c.
7
Alignment of a wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in the presence of a lens capsulotomy.在晶状体囊切开术存在的情况下进行波前引导的巩膜镜矫正的对准。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2020 Dec;43(6):613-616. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
8
Ocular Impression-Based Scleral Lens With Wavefront-Guided Optics for Visual Improvement in Keratoconus.基于眼像差的巩膜镜联合波前像差引导技术用于圆锥角膜的视觉改善。
Eye Contact Lens. 2022 Nov 1;48(11):485-488. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000922. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
9
Change in Accommodation and Ocular Aberrations in Keratoconus Patients Fitted With Scleral Lenses.圆锥角膜患者佩戴巩膜镜后调节及眼像差的变化
Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Sep;44 Suppl 1:S50-S53. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000317.
10
A Comparison of Three Methods to Increase Scleral Contact Lens On-Eye Stability.三种提高巩膜接触镜眼表稳定性方法的比较
Eye Contact Lens. 2015 Nov;41(6):386-90. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000145.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual Improvement With Wavefront-Guided Scleral Lenses for Irregular Corneal Astigmatism.波前引导巩膜镜治疗不规则角膜散光的视力改善情况
Eye Contact Lens. 2025 Feb 1;51(2):58-64. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000001152. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
2
Avoiding penetrating keratoplasty in severe keratoconus using a wavefront-guided scleral lens.使用波前引导巩膜镜避免在重度圆锥角膜中进行穿透性角膜移植术。
Clin Exp Optom. 2022 Jan;105(1):86-88. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1945407. Epub 2021 Jul 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses?聚合物涂层会改变传统和波前引导巩膜镜的像差吗?
Optom Vis Sci. 2020 Jan;97(1):28-35. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001462.
2
To rub or not to rub? - effective rigid contact lens cleaning.摩擦还是不摩擦?——有效清洁硬性隐形眼镜
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020 Jan;40(1):17-23. doi: 10.1111/opo.12655. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
3
Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia.角膜扩张症患者适应后波前引导型与最佳传统巩膜镜的比较
Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Apr;96(4):238-247. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001365.
4
The influence of centre thickness on miniscleral lens flexure.中心厚度对巩膜小镜片弯曲度的影响。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Feb;42(1):63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
5
Scleral gas permeable lenses have come of age.巩膜透气硬性隐形眼镜已经成熟。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Aug;39(4):247-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2016.06.007.
6
Wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in keratoconus.圆锥角膜的波前引导巩膜镜矫正
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Oct;91(10):1221-30. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000275.
7
Modern scleral contact lenses: A review.现代巩膜接触镜:综述
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014 Aug;37(4):240-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
8
Wavefront-guided scleral lens prosthetic device for keratoconus.用于圆锥角膜的波前引导巩膜镜片修复装置。
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Apr;90(4):314-23. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318288d19c.
9
Effect of two different cleaning methods on the back optic zone radii and surface smoothness of menicon rigid gas-permeable lenses.两种不同清洁方法对美尼康硬性透气性角膜接触镜后光学区半径及表面光滑度的影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Jun;81(6):461-7. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000135101.86416.09.
10
Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations.基于波前像差的客观验光的准确性和精确性。
J Vis. 2004 Apr 23;4(4):329-51. doi: 10.1167/4.4.9.