Suppr超能文献

使用磁共振动态对比增强灌注来定义缺血性卒中血管内治疗后的再灌注。

Defining reperfusion post endovascular therapy in ischemic stroke using MR-dynamic contrast enhanced perfusion.

作者信息

d'Esterre Christopher D, Sah Rani Gupta, Assis Zarina, Talai Aron S, Demchuk Andrew M, Hill Michael D, Goyal Mayank, Lee Ting-Yim, Forkert Nils D, Barber Philip A

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Calgary Stroke Program, Calgary, Canada.

Seaman Family Centre, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2020 Dec 1;93(1116):20190890. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190890. Epub 2020 Sep 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements after endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke are important to distinguish early secondary injury related to persisting ischemia from that related to reperfusion when considering clinical response and infarct growth.

METHODS

We compare reperfusion quantified by the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Score (mTICI) with perfusion measured by MRI dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion within 5 h of EVT anterior circulation stroke. MR perfusion (rCBF, rCBV, rTmax, rT0) and mTICI scores were included in a predictive model for change in NIHSS at 24 h and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion growth (acute to 24 h MRI) using a machine learning RRELIEFF feature selection coupled with a support vector regression.

RESULTS

For all perfusion parameters, mean values within the acute infarct for the TICI-2b group (considered clinically good reperfusion) were not significantly different from those in the mTICI <2b (clinically poor reperfusion). However, there was a statistically significant difference in perfusion values within the acute infarct region of interest between the mTICI-3 group both mTICI-2b and <2b (). The features that made up the best predictive model for change in NIHSS and absolute DWI lesion volume change was rT0 within acute infarct ROI and admission CTA collaterals respectively. No other variables, including mTICI scores, were selected for these best models. The correlation coefficients (Root mean squared error) for the cross-validation were 0.47 (13.7) and 0.51 (5.7) for change in NIHSS and absolute DWI lesion volume change.

CONCLUSION

MR perfusion following EVT provides accurate physiological approach to understanding the relationship of CBF, clinical outcome, and DWI growth.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

MR perfusion CBF acquired is a robust, objective reperfusion measurement providing following recanalization of the target occlusion which is critical to distinguish potential therapeutic harm from the failed technical success of EVT as well as improve the responsiveness of clinical trial outcomes to disease modification.

摘要

目的

在考虑临床反应和梗死灶扩大时,急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗(EVT)后的脑血流量(CBF)测量对于区分与持续缺血相关的早期继发性损伤和与再灌注相关的损伤很重要。

方法

我们将通过改良脑梗死溶栓评分(mTICI)量化的再灌注与在EVT治疗前循环卒中5小时内通过MRI动态对比增强灌注测量的灌注进行比较。MR灌注(rCBF、rCBV、rTmax、rT0)和mTICI评分被纳入一个预测模型,该模型使用机器学习RRELIEFF特征选择结合支持向量回归来预测24小时时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)的变化以及扩散加权成像(DWI)病变扩大(急性至24小时MRI)。

结果

对于所有灌注参数,TICI-2b组(被认为临床再灌注良好)急性梗死灶内的平均值与mTICI<2b组(临床再灌注不良)相比无显著差异。然而,mTICI-3组与mTICI-2b组和<2b组相比,急性梗死灶感兴趣区内的灌注值存在统计学显著差异。构成NIHSS变化和绝对DWI病变体积变化最佳预测模型的特征分别是急性梗死灶ROI内的rT0和入院时CTA侧支循环。这些最佳模型未选择包括mTICI评分在内的其他变量。交叉验证的相关系数(均方根误差)对于NIHSS变化和绝对DWI病变体积变化分别为0.47(13.7)和0.51(5.7)。

结论

EVT后的MR灌注提供了一种准确的生理学方法来理解CBF、临床结局和DWI扩大之间的关系。

知识进展

所获取的MR灌注CBF是一种可靠、客观的再灌注测量方法,在目标闭塞再通后提供该测量,这对于区分EVT技术成功失败带来的潜在治疗危害以及提高临床试验结果对疾病改善的反应性至关重要。

相似文献

1
Defining reperfusion post endovascular therapy in ischemic stroke using MR-dynamic contrast enhanced perfusion.
Br J Radiol. 2020 Dec 1;93(1116):20190890. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190890. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
3
Early and Delayed Infarct Growth in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Prospective, Serial MRI Study.
Stroke. 2023 Jan;54(1):217-225. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.039090. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
4
Effect of collateral blood flow on patients undergoing endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke.
Stroke. 2014 Apr;45(4):1035-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004085. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
5
Infarct growth despite full reperfusion in endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Feb;8(2):117-21. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011497. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
6
Time to Reset the Definition of Successful Revascularization in Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;46(1-2):40-45. doi: 10.1159/000491553. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
7
Hyperperfusion after Endovascular Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 May;28(5):1212-1218. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
8
Computed Tomography Perfusion After Thrombectomy: An Immediate Surrogate Marker of Outcome After Recanalization in Acute Stroke.
Stroke. 2020 Jun;51(6):1736-1742. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029212. Epub 2020 May 14.
9
Perfusion-based selection for endovascular reperfusion therapy in anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Jul;35(7):1303-8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3889. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
10
Very Late Leptomeningeal Collaterals-Potential New Way to Subdivide Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) 2B.
Clin Neuroradiol. 2020 Mar;30(1):77-83. doi: 10.1007/s00062-018-0747-4. Epub 2018 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Infarcts Due to Large Vessel Occlusions Continue to Grow Despite Near-Complete Reperfusion After Endovascular Treatment.
J Stroke. 2024 May;26(2):260-268. doi: 10.5853/jos.2023.02621. Epub 2024 May 30.
2
Modeling diffusion-weighted imaging lesion expansion between 2 and 24 h after endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.
Neuroradiology. 2024 Apr;66(4):621-629. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03294-2. Epub 2024 Jan 26.

本文引用的文献

3
MR Perfusion to Determine the Status of Collaterals in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Look Beyond Time Maps.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Feb;39(2):219-225. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5454. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
4
Diffusion-Weighted MRI Stroke Volume Following Recanalization Treatment is Threshold-Dependent.
Clin Neuroradiol. 2019 Mar;29(1):135-141. doi: 10.1007/s00062-017-0634-4. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
5
Inter-Rater Reliability for Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction with TICI 2c Category.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 May;26(5):992-994. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
6
Impact of Modified TICI 3 versus Modified TICI 2b Reperfusion Score to Predict Good Outcome following Endovascular Therapy.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Jan;38(1):90-96. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4968. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
7
Time to redefine success? TICI 3 versus TICI 2b recanalization in middle cerebral artery occlusion treated with thrombectomy.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Feb;9(2):117-121. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012218. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
8
Time-Dependent Computed Tomographic Perfusion Thresholds for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Stroke. 2015 Dec;46(12):3390-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009250. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
10
Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2285-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415061. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验