Song Sang Gook, Hur Young Hoe, Cho Ju-Yeon, Shin Min Ho, Yoon Eun Ju, Kim Jin Woong
Department of Radiology, Gwangju Veterans Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea.
Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Oct;31(10):1636-1644.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
To retrospectively investigate incidence, clinical outcome, and risk factors of iatrogenic pleural effusion in patients with hepatic tumors undergoing radiofrequency (RF) ablation using artificial ascites (AA).
Patients (N = 163) who underwent RF ablation using AA were classified into pleural effusion and non-pleural effusion groups according to the presence of pleural effusion on immediate follow-up CT and chest radiograph after RF ablation. The pleural effusion group included asymptomatic and symptomatic subgroups. The incidence and subsequent clinical outcomes of patients developing pleural effusion after RF ablation were evaluated.
Overall, 96 patients (58.9%) developed pleural effusion, which resolved in 4.4 d ± 3.1. Hospital length of stay in the pleural effusion group was longer than the non-pleural effusion group (6.5 d ± 2.6 vs 5.7 d ± 2.8, P < .01). The pleural effusion group had longer AA infusion time (P = .01), larger infused AA volume (P < .01), and longer ablation time (P < .01) than the non-pleural effusion group. Eighteen patients (18.8%) developed symptomatic pleural effusion and had a larger infused AA volume than asymptomatic patients with pleural effusion (P < .01). Pleural effusion duration and hospital length stay were also longer in the symptomatic pleural effusion subgroup than in the asymptomatic subgroup (P < .01). Infused AA volume was the only independent prognostic factor of pleural effusion duration in multivariate analysis (P = .038).
Pleural effusion frequently occurs after RF ablation using AA. Although generally considered negligible, pleural effusion could be a clinical problem and prolong hospitalization. Therefore, operators should be careful not to infuse too much AA when performing RF ablation.
回顾性研究接受人工腹水(AA)辅助射频(RF)消融治疗的肝肿瘤患者医源性胸腔积液的发生率、临床结局及危险因素。
对163例接受AA辅助RF消融治疗的患者,根据射频消融术后即刻胸部CT和胸部X线片上有无胸腔积液,分为胸腔积液组和无胸腔积液组。胸腔积液组包括无症状和有症状亚组。评估射频消融术后发生胸腔积液患者的发生率及后续临床结局。
总体而言,96例患者(58.9%)发生胸腔积液,积液在4.4天±3.1天内消退。胸腔积液组的住院时间长于无胸腔积液组(6.5天±2.6天 vs 5.7天±2.8天,P < 0.01)。胸腔积液组的AA输注时间更长(P = 0.01),输注的AA量更大(P < 0.01),消融时间也比无胸腔积液组长(P < 0.01)。18例患者(18.8%)发生有症状的胸腔积液,其输注的AA量大于无症状胸腔积液患者(P < 0.01)。有症状胸腔积液亚组的胸腔积液持续时间和住院时间也比无症状亚组长(P < 0.01)。在多因素分析中,输注的AA量是胸腔积液持续时间的唯一独立预后因素(P = 0.038)。
使用AA进行RF消融术后胸腔积液频繁发生。尽管通常认为可忽略不计,但胸腔积液可能是一个临床问题并延长住院时间。因此,操作人员在进行RF消融时应注意不要输注过多的AA。