PEDEGO Research Unit and MRC Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Department of Children and Adolescents, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 Mar;106(2):178-183. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319069. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
To evaluate the long-term adverse reactions of paracetamol in children who required intensive care shortly after birth. Paracetamol is a widely used analgesic in neonates, but the long-term studies are lacking. Previous epidemiological studies have reported associations between early paracetamol intake and diseases in childhood.
Five-year follow-up cohort of children who required intensive care shortly after birth.
Single tertiary care hospital; neonatal and paediatric intensive care units.
Intravenous paracetamol was administered for pain and discomfort to the neonates during their intensive care, while for the control infants, it was not available.
The primary outcome was the incidence of asthma; secondary outcomes were neonatal diseases and long-term morbidities (atopic dermatitis, inflammatory bowel disease, autism, speech disorders, cerebral palsy). Long-term morbidities were adjusted based on antenatal and neonatal risk factors.
We screened all neonates admitted to the intensive care units soon after birth in Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland, during 1 October 2007 to 31 December 2013. Altogether, 1552 infants needed intensive care. Of them, 735 (47%) were treated with intravenous paracetamol. We obtained their long-term data from the Finnish National Institute for Health and Welfare, including all physician-made diagnoses from all primary healthcare units and hospitals in Finland. We found no difference in the asthma incidence or in other long-term morbidities between paracetamol-treated and non-exposed infants.
Intravenous paracetamol given to neonates did not associate with childhood disorders compared with the non-exposed infants during the 5-year follow-up. The previous hypothesis that early paracetamol use causes childhood morbidities was not confirmed.
评估出生后不久即需要重症监护的儿童中扑热息痛的长期不良反应。扑热息痛是新生儿中广泛使用的镇痛药,但缺乏长期研究。先前的流行病学研究报告了早期扑热息痛摄入与儿童期疾病之间的关联。
出生后不久即需要重症监护的儿童的 5 年随访队列。
单家三级保健医院;新生儿和儿科重症监护病房。
在重症监护期间,为新生儿因疼痛和不适而静脉注射扑热息痛,而对照组婴儿则无法使用。
主要结局是哮喘的发病率;次要结局是新生儿疾病和长期并发症(特应性皮炎、炎症性肠病、自闭症、言语障碍、脑瘫)。根据产前和新生儿危险因素调整长期并发症。
我们筛选了芬兰奥卢大学医院新生儿重症监护病房于 2007 年 10 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日期间出生后不久即需要重症监护的所有新生儿。共有 1552 名婴儿需要重症监护。其中,735 名(47%)接受了静脉注射扑热息痛治疗。我们从芬兰国家卫生和福利研究所获得了他们的长期数据,包括芬兰所有初级保健单位和医院的所有医生做出的诊断。我们发现,与未暴露于扑热息痛的婴儿相比,接受扑热息痛治疗的婴儿在哮喘发病率或其他长期并发症方面没有差异。
与未暴露于扑热息痛的婴儿相比,在 5 年随访期间,新生儿使用静脉注射扑热息痛与儿童期疾病无关。先前关于早期扑热息痛使用导致儿童期疾病的假设并未得到证实。