Suppr超能文献

接受皮下免疫球蛋白(SCIG)治疗的原发性免疫缺陷患者的儿科亚组:SHIFT和IBIS汇总数据的事后分析

Pediatric subset of primary immunodeficiency patients treated with SCIG: post hoc analysis of SHIFT and IBIS pooled data.

作者信息

Moschese Viviana, Canessa Clementina, Trizzino Antonino, Martire Baldassarre, Boggia Giorgio Maria, Graziani Simona

机构信息

Pediatric Immunopathology and Allergology Unit, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.

Pediatric Immunology Meyer Children's Hospital University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 24, 50139 Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020 Sep 9;16:80. doi: 10.1186/s13223-020-00478-2. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary immunodeficiencies (PID) constitute a heterogeneous group of more than 350 monogenetic diseases. PID patients with antibody impairment require lifelong administration of immunoglobulin G replacement therapy, administered either intravenously (IVIG) or subcutaneously (SCIG). Although the effectiveness of weekly and biweekly (every other week) SCIG administration has been shown in several trials, data on the viability of these two regimens in pediatric PID patients are sparse.

METHODS

Data on the pediatric subsets of PID patients enrolled in SHIFT (weekly) and IBIS (biweekly) studies were pooled and analyzed to indirectly compare two different 20%-concentrated SCIG (Hizentra) regimens. The primary endpoints were to evaluate trough IgG levels and cumulative monthly doses; the secondary endpoint was to analyze incidence of infections.

RESULTS

Fifteen and 13 children from the SHIFT and IBIS studies were included, respectively. Cumulative 20%-concentrated SCIG monthly dose was slight lower for the biweekly regimen (Δ = - 2.04, 90% CI - 8.3 to 4.23). However, the trough IgG levels were similar between the two groups (Δ = 0.28, 90% CI - 0.51 to 1.07) and constantly above the threshold of 5 g/L. After adjusting for potential confounders, the annualized rate of infections was similar between SHIFT and IBIS patients (incidence rate ratio = 1.09, 90% CI 0.72-1.67); only 1 serious bacterial infection was experienced by a patient in the IBIS group.

CONCLUSION

In pediatric PID patients, weekly and biweekly Hizentra administrations appeared equally effective treatment options.

摘要

背景

原发性免疫缺陷病(PID)是一组由350多种单基因疾病组成的异质性疾病。抗体功能受损的PID患者需要终身接受免疫球蛋白G替代疗法,可通过静脉注射(IVIG)或皮下注射(SCIG)给药。尽管多项试验已证明每周和每两周(每隔一周)皮下注射免疫球蛋白的有效性,但关于这两种给药方案在儿童PID患者中的可行性数据却很少。

方法

汇总并分析参与SHIFT(每周一次)和IBIS(每两周一次)研究的PID患者儿童亚组的数据,以间接比较两种不同的20%浓度皮下注射免疫球蛋白(Hizentra)给药方案。主要终点是评估谷值IgG水平和每月累积剂量;次要终点是分析感染发生率。

结果

分别纳入了SHIFT和IBIS研究中的15名和13名儿童。每两周给药方案的20%浓度皮下注射免疫球蛋白每月累积剂量略低(差值=-2.04,90%置信区间为-8.3至4.23)。然而,两组之间的谷值IgG水平相似(差值=0.28,90%置信区间为-0.51至1.07),且持续高于5g/L的阈值。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,SHIFT和IBIS患者的年化感染率相似(发病率比=1.09,90%置信区间为0.72-1.67);IBIS组仅有1名患者发生了1次严重细菌感染。

结论

在儿童PID患者中,每周和每两周一次注射Hizentra似乎是同样有效的治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa5/7491303/22079d5c5953/13223_2020_478_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验