Stevens Geert Philip
Department of Public Law, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Feb 13;27(2):202-213. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2019.1688131. eCollection 2020.
Recently the role of neuroscience in assessing criminal responsibility has become an issue of academic and practical debate. The question that arises is the role that neurological or brain disorders can play in assessing criminal responsibility. Within the context of South African criminal law, the question arises as to whether these disorders will meet the threshold requirements for the defence of pathological criminal incapacity. Various medico-legal issues arise when assessing the role of neurological disorders in relation to criminal responsibility. In this contribution, the reflections are provided pertaining to the role of neuroscientific evidence in explaining criminal responsibility within the context of selected areas of application. Evidentiary aspects pertaining to the presentation of neuroscientific evidence are further canvassed as well as the role of neuroscientific evidence advanced in support of mitigation of punishment.
最近,神经科学在评估刑事责任方面的作用已成为学术和实践辩论的一个问题。由此产生的问题是神经或脑部疾病在评估刑事责任中可能发挥的作用。在南非刑法的背景下,出现了这些疾病是否符合病理性刑事责任能力辩护的门槛要求的问题。在评估神经疾病与刑事责任相关的作用时,会出现各种法医学问题。在本论文中,针对神经科学证据在特定应用领域背景下解释刑事责任的作用给出了思考。还进一步探讨了与神经科学证据呈现相关的证据方面,以及为支持减轻处罚而提出的神经科学证据的作用。