Weirauch Katrina, Phillips Julie
Michigan State University, Sparrow Family Medicine Residency Program.
PRiMER. 2017 Feb 8;1:2. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2017.1.2. eCollection 2017 Sep.
Pediatric obesity is an increasingly prevalent problem. Several studies have examined prevention and treatment strategies. The majority of effective studies involved school or community interventions. With health care becoming more collaborative, we hypothesized that a behavioral health specialist may be effective in executing multifaceted interventions with families of at-risk patients.
This is a prospective randomized study, evaluating impact of intervention with a behavioral specialist on lifestyle risk factors for pediatric obesity in children. At-risk behaviors were identified with a screening tool from the Healthy Kids, Healthy Michigan Clinical Decision Tools, based on the 2007 American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines on pediatric obesity. An intervention group received ongoing care from the behavioral specialist over three months, including motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapy. Participants were compared with a control group receiving usual care.
There was no significant difference between the intervention and control group regarding change in number of risk factors. However, both groups had a reduced number of risk factors at follow-up. The control group had a significant change in number of risk factors after the intervention.
There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. However, it is notable that both groups saw significant decreases in total number of risk factors. The only addition to usual care provided to the control group was use of the screening tool. Our results indicate that the use of a screening tool and brief physician intervention may be an effective means for improving healthy behaviors within families.
儿童肥胖是一个日益普遍的问题。已有多项研究探讨了预防和治疗策略。大多数有效的研究涉及学校或社区干预。随着医疗保健变得更加协作,我们推测行为健康专家可能有效地对高危患者家庭实施多方面干预。
这是一项前瞻性随机研究,评估行为专家干预对儿童肥胖生活方式风险因素的影响。根据2007年美国儿科学会关于儿童肥胖的指南,使用“健康儿童,健康密歇根临床决策工具”中的筛查工具确定高危行为。干预组在三个月内接受行为专家的持续护理,包括动机性访谈和认知行为疗法。将参与者与接受常规护理的对照组进行比较。
干预组和对照组在风险因素数量变化方面没有显著差异。然而,两组在随访时风险因素数量均有所减少。干预后,对照组的风险因素数量有显著变化。
两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,值得注意的是,两组的风险因素总数均显著下降。对照组接受的常规护理唯一增加的是使用筛查工具。我们的结果表明,使用筛查工具和简短的医生干预可能是改善家庭健康行为的有效手段。