• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸腰椎损伤分类及损伤严重度评分 4 型(TLICS=4)胸腰椎骨折的治疗:手术与保守治疗的比较。

Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Adana City Hospital, Adana-Turkey.

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul-Turkey.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2020 Sep;26(5):805-810. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524.

DOI:10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524
PMID:32946086
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of surgical treatment and conservative treatment with bracing in neurologically intact patients with score 4 of TLICS thoracolumbar vertebra fractures.

METHODS

Patients with traumatic thoracolumbar junction fractures (T11-L2), the score of TLICS 4, and minimum 24-month follow-up were included in this study. Patients were divided into surgery and bracing groups. The groups were compared concerning clinical and demographical features, local kyphotic angles (LKA), vertebra height loss percentage (VHL), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and time to return to work.

RESULTS

There were 74 patients (71 males, 3 females) in the surgery group and 76 patients (58 males, 18 females) in the bracing group. Although the surgery group showed better improvement in VAS scores within six months postoperatively, no significant difference was observed at the 24th-month evaluation (p<0.001 and p=0.270, respectively). ODI, LKA and VHL were significantly lower in the surgery group (p<0.001, p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). In addition, return to work was significantly earlier in the surgery group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The findings obtained in this study suggest that the surgical treatment for TLICS 4 patients with thoracolumbar fractures has better clinical and radiographic outcomes than the bracing. Moreover, returning time to the work of patients is shortened with surgical treatment. The surgical treatment seems to be the first and the appropriate choice in the management of TLICS 4 thoracolumbar vertebral fractures.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较神经完整的 TLICS 胸腰椎骨折评分 4 分的患者手术治疗与支具保守治疗的临床和影像学结果。

方法

纳入创伤性胸腰椎交界处骨折(T11-L2)、TLICS 评分 4 分且随访时间至少 24 个月的患者。将患者分为手术组和支具组。比较两组患者的临床和人口统计学特征、局部后凸角(LKA)、椎体高度丢失百分比(VHL)、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)和恢复工作时间。

结果

手术组 74 例(71 例男性,3 例女性),支具组 76 例(58 例男性,18 例女性)。尽管手术后 6 个月内手术组 VAS 评分改善更好,但 24 个月评估时无显著差异(分别为 p<0.001 和 p=0.270)。手术组 ODI、LKA 和 VHL 明显较低(均为 p<0.001)。此外,手术组恢复工作时间明显更早(p<0.001)。

结论

本研究结果表明,TLICS 4 型胸腰椎骨折患者的手术治疗比支具治疗具有更好的临床和影像学结果。此外,手术治疗可缩短患者重返工作岗位的时间。手术治疗似乎是 TLICS 4 型胸腰椎骨折治疗的首选和适当选择。

相似文献

1
Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment.胸腰椎损伤分类及损伤严重度评分 4 型(TLICS=4)胸腰椎骨折的治疗:手术与保守治疗的比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2020 Sep;26(5):805-810. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524.
2
Outcomes in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures With a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification Score (TLICS) of 4 Treated With Surgery Versus Initial Conservative Management.胸腰椎爆裂骨折采用手术治疗与初始保守治疗的疗效比较:胸腰椎损伤分类评分(TLICS)为4分的病例
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Jul;31(6):E317-E321. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000656.
3
Nonoperative Management in Neurologically Intact Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.神经功能完整的胸腰椎爆裂骨折的非手术治疗:临床及影像学结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Mar;41(6):483-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001253.
4
Evaluation of TLICS for thoracolumbar fractures.胸腰椎骨折的胸腰椎损伤分类与严重程度评分系统评估
Eur Spine J. 2016 Apr;25(4):1123-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3889-y. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Conservative Treatment Compared With Surgical Treatment for Thoracolumbar Fracture With Score 4 Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.保守治疗与手术治疗胸腰椎骨折评分 4 型胸腰椎损伤分类和严重程度(TLICS)的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Jun 1;37(5):230-241. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001503. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
6
Risk Factors for the Failure of Spinal Burst Fractures Treated Conservatively According to the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS): A Retrospective Cohort Trial.根据胸腰椎损伤分类及严重程度评分(TLICS)进行保守治疗的脊柱爆裂骨折失败的危险因素:一项回顾性队列试验
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 18;10(8):e0135735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135735. eCollection 2015.
7
Is the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) Superior to the AO Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System for Guiding the Surgical Management of Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures without Neurological Deficit?对于无神经功能缺损的不稳定胸腰椎爆裂骨折的手术治疗指导,胸腰椎损伤分类及严重程度评分(TLICS)是否优于AO胸腰椎损伤分类系统?
Turk Neurosurg. 2018;28(1):94-98. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.19094-16.2.
8
Conservative Versus Operative Treatment of Stable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures in Neurologically Intact Patients: Is There Any Difference Regarding the Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes?保守治疗与手术治疗对神经功能完整的胸腰椎爆裂性骨折患者的疗效比较:临床和影像学结果有差异吗?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Apr 1;45(7):452-458. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003295.
9
Can conservative treatment be effective for thoracolumbar injuries patients with TLICS scores of 4 or 5? An analysis of initial radiological findings and clinical risk factors for treatment failure.胸腰椎损伤 TLICS 评分为 4 或 5 的患者能否采用保守治疗?对初始影像学发现和治疗失败临床危险因素的分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jun 3;25(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07543-6.
10
A pilot evaluation of the role of bracing in stable thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit.支具在无神经功能缺损的稳定型胸腰椎爆裂骨折中作用的初步评估
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Oct;27(7):370-5. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826eacae.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of mTLICS versus TLICS and TL AOSIS in stratifying three-tier treatment for thoracolumbar injuries: focus on intermediate score range.在对胸腰椎损伤进行三层治疗分层时,mTLICS与TLICS及TL AOSIS的诊断准确性和临床效用:聚焦于中间评分范围
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Sep 1;26(1):824. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-09124-7.
2
The Effectiveness and Practical Application of Different Reduction Techniques in Burst Fractures of the Thoracolumbar Spine.不同复位技术在胸腰椎爆裂骨折中的有效性及实际应用
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 3;14(13):4700. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134700.
3
Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation offers new treatment option for thoracolumbar burst fractures with secondary spinal stenosis.
单侧双通道内镜减压联合经皮椎弓根螺钉固定为伴有继发性椎管狭窄的胸腰椎爆裂骨折提供了新的治疗选择。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 6;15(1):877. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85543-9.
4
Evaluation of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) Score Over a Two-Year Period at a Level One Trauma Center.在一级创伤中心对胸腰椎损伤分类与严重程度(TLICS)评分进行的为期两年的评估。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 19;15(8):e43762. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43762. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Patient-reported outcomes after posterior surgical stabilization for thoracolumbar junction fractures: A pilot study with combined patient-reported outcome measure methodology.胸腰段交界处骨折后路手术稳定后的患者报告结局:一项采用患者报告结局测量综合方法的初步研究。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2023 Apr-Jun;14(2):149-158. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_38_23. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
6
Surgical Versus Non-Surgical Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurological Deficit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.无神经功能缺损的胸腰椎爆裂骨折的手术与非手术治疗:系统评价与Meta分析
Global Spine J. 2024 Mar;14(2):740-749. doi: 10.1177/21925682231181875. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
7
Nonoperative Management in Intact Burst Fracture Patient With Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score of 5: A Case Report.胸腰椎损伤分类及严重程度评分5分的完整爆裂骨折患者的非手术治疗:1例病例报告
Cureus. 2022 Sep 23;14(9):e29492. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29492. eCollection 2022 Sep.
8
Indications for Nonsurgical Treatment of Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.胸腰椎骨折非手术治疗的适应症:世界神经外科联合会脊柱委员会建议
Neurospine. 2021 Dec;18(4):713-724. doi: 10.14245/ns.2142390.195. Epub 2021 Dec 31.