Suppr超能文献

胸腰椎损伤分类及损伤严重度评分 4 型(TLICS=4)胸腰椎骨折的治疗:手术与保守治疗的比较。

Management of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score of 4 (TLICS=4) thoracolumbar vertebra fractures: Surgery versus conservative treatment.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Adana City Hospital, Adana-Turkey.

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul-Turkey.

出版信息

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2020 Sep;26(5):805-810. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.30524.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of surgical treatment and conservative treatment with bracing in neurologically intact patients with score 4 of TLICS thoracolumbar vertebra fractures.

METHODS

Patients with traumatic thoracolumbar junction fractures (T11-L2), the score of TLICS 4, and minimum 24-month follow-up were included in this study. Patients were divided into surgery and bracing groups. The groups were compared concerning clinical and demographical features, local kyphotic angles (LKA), vertebra height loss percentage (VHL), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and time to return to work.

RESULTS

There were 74 patients (71 males, 3 females) in the surgery group and 76 patients (58 males, 18 females) in the bracing group. Although the surgery group showed better improvement in VAS scores within six months postoperatively, no significant difference was observed at the 24th-month evaluation (p<0.001 and p=0.270, respectively). ODI, LKA and VHL were significantly lower in the surgery group (p<0.001, p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). In addition, return to work was significantly earlier in the surgery group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The findings obtained in this study suggest that the surgical treatment for TLICS 4 patients with thoracolumbar fractures has better clinical and radiographic outcomes than the bracing. Moreover, returning time to the work of patients is shortened with surgical treatment. The surgical treatment seems to be the first and the appropriate choice in the management of TLICS 4 thoracolumbar vertebral fractures.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较神经完整的 TLICS 胸腰椎骨折评分 4 分的患者手术治疗与支具保守治疗的临床和影像学结果。

方法

纳入创伤性胸腰椎交界处骨折(T11-L2)、TLICS 评分 4 分且随访时间至少 24 个月的患者。将患者分为手术组和支具组。比较两组患者的临床和人口统计学特征、局部后凸角(LKA)、椎体高度丢失百分比(VHL)、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)和恢复工作时间。

结果

手术组 74 例(71 例男性,3 例女性),支具组 76 例(58 例男性,18 例女性)。尽管手术后 6 个月内手术组 VAS 评分改善更好,但 24 个月评估时无显著差异(分别为 p<0.001 和 p=0.270)。手术组 ODI、LKA 和 VHL 明显较低(均为 p<0.001)。此外,手术组恢复工作时间明显更早(p<0.001)。

结论

本研究结果表明,TLICS 4 型胸腰椎骨折患者的手术治疗比支具治疗具有更好的临床和影像学结果。此外,手术治疗可缩短患者重返工作岗位的时间。手术治疗似乎是 TLICS 4 型胸腰椎骨折治疗的首选和适当选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验