• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在存在未测量混杂因素的情况下总结生存曲线中的因果差异。

Summarizing causal differences in survival curves in the presence of unmeasured confounding.

作者信息

Martínez-Camblor Pablo, MacKenzie Todd A, Staiger Douglas O, Goodney Phillip P, O'Malley A James

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.

The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.

出版信息

Int J Biostat. 2020 Sep 18;17(2):223-240. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2019-0146.

DOI:10.1515/ijb-2019-0146
PMID:32946418
Abstract

Proportional hazard Cox regression models are frequently used to analyze the impact of different factors on time-to-event outcomes. Most practitioners are familiar with and interpret research results in terms of hazard ratios. Direct differences in survival curves are, however, easier to understand for the general population of users and to visualize graphically. Analyzing the difference among the survival curves for the population at risk allows easy interpretation of the impact of a therapy over the follow-up. When the available information is obtained from observational studies, the observed results are potentially subject to a plethora of measured and unmeasured confounders. Although there are procedures to adjust survival curves for measured covariates, the case of unmeasured confounders has not yet been considered in the literature. In this article we provide a semi-parametric procedure for adjusting survival curves for measured and unmeasured confounders. The method augments our novel instrumental variable estimation method for survival time data in the presence of unmeasured confounding with a procedure for mapping estimates onto the survival probability and the expected survival time scales.

摘要

比例风险Cox回归模型常用于分析不同因素对事件发生时间结局的影响。大多数从业者熟悉风险比并据此解释研究结果。然而,生存曲线的直接差异对于一般用户群体来说更容易理解,并且便于以图形方式直观呈现。分析处于风险中的人群生存曲线之间的差异,能够轻松解读在随访期间一种治疗方法的影响。当从观察性研究中获取可用信息时,观察到的结果可能会受到大量已测量和未测量混杂因素的影响。尽管有针对已测量协变量调整生存曲线的方法,但文献中尚未考虑未测量混杂因素的情况。在本文中,我们提供了一种半参数方法,用于针对已测量和未测量混杂因素调整生存曲线。该方法在存在未测量混杂因素的情况下,将我们用于生存时间数据的新型工具变量估计方法与一种将估计值映射到生存概率和预期生存时间尺度的方法相结合。

相似文献

1
Summarizing causal differences in survival curves in the presence of unmeasured confounding.在存在未测量混杂因素的情况下总结生存曲线中的因果差异。
Int J Biostat. 2020 Sep 18;17(2):223-240. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2019-0146.
2
Bias in estimating the causal hazard ratio when using two-stage instrumental variable methods.使用两阶段工具变量法时因果风险比估计中的偏差。
Stat Med. 2015 Jun 30;34(14):2235-65. doi: 10.1002/sim.6470. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
3
Unifying instrumental variable and inverse probability weighting approaches for inference of causal treatment effect and unmeasured confounding in observational studies.将工具变量和逆概率加权方法统一用于观察性研究中因果治疗效果和未测量混杂的推断。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):671-686. doi: 10.1177/0962280220971835. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
4
The impact of unmeasured within- and between-cluster confounding on the bias of effect estimatorsof a continuous exposure.未测量的组内和组间混杂因素对连续暴露效应估计值偏倚的影响。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Aug;29(8):2119-2139. doi: 10.1177/0962280219883323. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
5
Adjustment for time-dependent unmeasured confounders in marginal structural Cox models using validation sample data.使用验证样本数据调整边际结构 Cox 模型中时依性未测量混杂因素。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Feb;28(2):357-371. doi: 10.1177/0962280217726800. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
6
Instrumental variable estimation of the causal hazard ratio.工具变量估计因果风险比。
Biometrics. 2023 Jun;79(2):539-550. doi: 10.1111/biom.13792. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
7
Bespoke Instruments: A new tool for addressing unmeasured confounders.定制仪器:解决未测量混杂因素的新工具。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Mar 24;191(5):939-947. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab288.
8
Estimating population-averaged hazard ratios in the presence of unmeasured confounding.在存在未测量混杂因素的情况下估计人群平均危害比。
Int J Biostat. 2022 Mar 23;19(1):39-52. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2021-0096. eCollection 2023 May 1.
9
A general approach to evaluating the bias of 2-stage instrumental variable estimators.两阶段工具变量估计量偏差的一般评估方法。
Stat Med. 2018 May 30;37(12):1997-2015. doi: 10.1002/sim.7636. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
10
How unmeasured confounding in a competing risks setting can affect treatment effect estimates in observational studies.在竞争风险环境中,未测量的混杂因素如何影响观察性研究中的治疗效果估计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jul 31;19(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0808-7.

引用本文的文献

1
PSD3 as a context-dependent modulator of immune landscape and tumor aggressiveness in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.PSD3作为食管鳞状细胞癌免疫格局和肿瘤侵袭性的一种上下文依赖性调节因子。
Front Immunol. 2025 Aug 15;16:1641254. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1641254. eCollection 2025.
2
Learning the Treatment Impact on Time-to-Event Outcomes: The Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Simulated Cohort.学习对事件时间结局治疗影响:经颈动脉血运重建模拟队列。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;19(19):12476. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912476.